Implementation of intracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomy is safe and associated with a shorter hospital stay.


Journal

Updates in surgery
ISSN: 2038-3312
Titre abrégé: Updates Surg
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 101539818

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2021
Historique:
received: 26 04 2020
accepted: 21 06 2020
pubmed: 2 7 2020
medline: 4 8 2021
entrez: 2 7 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Reconstruction after laparoscopic right colectomy (LRC) can be achieved by performing an intracorporeal (IA) or an extracorporeal anastomosis (EA). This study aims to assess the safety of implementing IA in LRC, and to compare its perioperative outcomes with EA during an institution's learning curve. Patients undergoing elective LRC with IA or EA in a teaching university hospital between January 2015 and December 2018 were included. Demographic, clinical, perioperative and histopathological data were collated and outcomes investigated. One hundred and twenty-two patients were included; forty-three (35.2%) had an IA. The main indication for surgery was cancer in both groups (83.7% for IA and 79.8% for EA; p = 0.50). Operative time was longer for IA (180 [150-205] versus 150 [120-180] minutes; p < 0.001). A Pfannenstiel incision was used as extraction site in 97.7% of patients receiving an IA; while a midline incision was used in 97.5% of patients having an EA (p < 0.001). Hospital stay was significantly shorter for IA (3 [3, 4] versus 4 [3-6] days; p = 0.003). There were no differences in postoperative complications rates between groups. There was a 4.7% and 3.8% anastomotic leak rate in the IA and EA group, respectively (p = 1). Re-intervention and readmission rates were similar between groups, and there was no mortality during the study period. The implementation of IA in LRC is safe. Despite longer operative times, IA is associated with a shorter hospital stay when compared to EA in the setting of an institution's learning curve.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32607844
doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00840-4
pii: 10.1007/s13304-020-00840-4
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

93-100

Références

Kuhry E, Schwenk W, Gaupset R et al (2008) Long-term outcome of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a cochrane systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Cancer Treat Rev 34:498–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrv.2008.03.011
doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2008.03.011 pubmed: 18468803
Schwenk W, Haase O, Neudecker JJ, Müller JM (2005) Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003145.pub2
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003145.pub2 pubmed: 16034888
Jamali FR, Soweid AM, Dimassi H et al (2008) Evaluating the degree of difficulty of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Arch Surg 143:762–767. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.143.8.762
doi: 10.1001/archsurg.143.8.762 pubmed: 18711036 pmcid: 18711036
Ricci C, Casadei R, Alagna V et al (2017) A critical and comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing intracorporeal and extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 402:417–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-016-1509-x
doi: 10.1007/s00423-016-1509-x
Wu Q, Jin C, Hu T et al (2017) Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 27:348–357. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2016.0485
doi: 10.1089/lap.2016.0485
Feroci F, Lenzi E, Garzi A et al (2013) Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 28:1177–1186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-013-1651-7
doi: 10.1007/s00384-013-1651-7 pubmed: 23371336
Milone M, Elmore U, Vignali A et al (2018) Recovery after intracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 403:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-017-1645-y
doi: 10.1007/s00423-017-1645-y
Vignali A, Bissolati M, De Nardi P et al (2016) Extracorporeal vs intracorporeal ileocolic stapled anastomoses in laparoscopic right colectomy: an interim analysis of a randomized clinical trial. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 26:343–348. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2015.0547
doi: 10.1089/lap.2015.0547
van Oostendorp S, Elfrink A, Borstlap W et al (2017) Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in right hemicolectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 31:64–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4982-y
doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4982-y
Cirocchi R, Trastulli S, Farinella E et al (2013) Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis during laparoscopic right hemicolectomy-Systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Oncol 22:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2012.09.002
doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2012.09.002 pubmed: 23116767
Carnuccio P, Jimeno J, Parés D (2014) Laparoscopic right colectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies comparing two types of anastomosis. Tech Coloproctol 18:5–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-013-1029-4
doi: 10.1007/s10151-013-1029-4 pubmed: 23686680
Allaix ME, Degiuli M, Bonino MA et al (2019) Intracorporeal or extracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis after laparoscopic right colectomy: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 270:762–767. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003519
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003519 pubmed: 31592811
Bollo J, Turrado V, Rabal A et al (2020) Randomized clinical trial of intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomy (IEA trial). Br J Surg 107:364–372. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11389
doi: 10.1002/bjs.11389 pubmed: 31846067
Marchesi F, Pinna F, Percalli L et al (2013) Totally laparoscopic right colectomy: theoretical and practical advantages over the laparo-assisted approach. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 23:418–424. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2012.0420
doi: 10.1089/lap.2012.0420
UICC (2010) TNM classification of malignant tumours, 7th edn. Wiley, New York
Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8
doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8 pubmed: 3558716
Slankamenac K, Graf R, Barkun J et al (2013) The comprehensive complication index: a novel continuous scale to measure surgical morbidity. Ann Surg 258:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e318296c732
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318296c732 pubmed: 23728278
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A (2004) Classification of surgical complications. Ann Surg 240:205–213. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae
doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae pubmed: 1360123 pmcid: 1360123
Castillo R, Buckel E, León F et al (2015) Effectiveness of learning advanced laparoscopic skills in a brief intensive laparoscopy training program. J Surg Educ 72:648–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.01.016
doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.01.016 pubmed: 26073475
Varas J, Mejía R, Riquelme A et al (2012) Significant transfer of surgical skills obtained with an advanced laparoscopic training program to a laparoscopic jejunojejunostomy in a live porcine model: feasibility of learning advanced laparoscopy in a general surgery residency. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 26:3486–3494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2391-4
doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2391-4
Reggio S, Sciuto A, Cuccurullo D et al (2015) Single-layer versus double-layer closure of the enterotomy in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis: a single-center study. Tech Coloproctol 19:745–750. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-015-1378-2
doi: 10.1007/s10151-015-1378-2 pubmed: 26470861
Bracale U, Merola G, Cabras F et al (2018) The use of barbed suture for intracorporeal mechanical anastomosis during a totally laparoscopic right colectomy: is it safe? A retrospective nonrandomized comparative multicenter study. Surg Innov 25:267–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/1553350618765871
doi: 10.1177/1553350618765871 pubmed: 29577831
Benlice C, Stocchi L, Costedio MM et al (2016) Impact of the specific extraction-site location on the risk of incisional hernia after laparoscopic colorectal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 59:743–750. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000000632
doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000632 pubmed: 27384092
Biondi A, Santocchi P, Pennestrì F et al (2017) Totally laparoscopic right colectomy versus laparoscopically assisted right colectomy: a propensity score analysis. Surg Endosc 31:5275–5282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5601-2
doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5601-2 pubmed: 28577059
Mari GM, Crippa J, Costanzi ATM et al (2018) Intracorporeal anastomosis reduces surgical stress response in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Tech 28:77–81. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000000506
doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000506
Orcutt ST, Balentine CJ, Marshall CL et al (2012) Use of a pfannenstiel incision in minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery is associated with a lower risk of wound complications. Tech Coloproctol 16:127–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-012-0808-7
doi: 10.1007/s10151-012-0808-7 pubmed: 22350173
DeSouza A, Domajnko B, Park J et al (2011) Incisional hernia, midline versus low transverse incision: what is the ideal incision for specimen extraction and hand-assisted laparoscopy? Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 25:1031–1036. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1309-2
doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1309-2
Rausa E, Kelly ME, Asti E et al (2019) Right hemicolectomy: a network meta-analysis comparing open, laparoscopic-assisted, total laparoscopic, and robotic approach. Surg Endosc 33:1020–1032. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6592-3
doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6592-3 pubmed: 30456506

Auteurs

Cristián Jarry (C)

Department of Digestive Surgery, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Diagonal Paraguay 362, Fourth Floor, Santiago, Chile.

Leonardo Cárcamo (L)

Department of Digestive Surgery, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Diagonal Paraguay 362, Fourth Floor, Santiago, Chile.

Juan José González (JJ)

Intern, Faculty of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.

Felipe Bellolio (F)

Department of Digestive Surgery, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Diagonal Paraguay 362, Fourth Floor, Santiago, Chile.

Rodrigo Miguieles (R)

Department of Digestive Surgery, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Diagonal Paraguay 362, Fourth Floor, Santiago, Chile.

Gonzalo Urrejola (G)

Department of Digestive Surgery, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Diagonal Paraguay 362, Fourth Floor, Santiago, Chile.

Alvaro Zúñiga (A)

Department of Digestive Surgery, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Diagonal Paraguay 362, Fourth Floor, Santiago, Chile.

Fernando Crovari (F)

Department of Digestive Surgery, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Diagonal Paraguay 362, Fourth Floor, Santiago, Chile.

María Elena Molina (ME)

Department of Digestive Surgery, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Diagonal Paraguay 362, Fourth Floor, Santiago, Chile.

José Tomás Larach (JT)

Department of Digestive Surgery, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Diagonal Paraguay 362, Fourth Floor, Santiago, Chile. jtlarach@uc.cl.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH