Non-occupational exposure to phthalates in Finland.
Biomonitoring
Biomonitoring equivalent
Environmental exposure
Non-occupational exposure
Phthalates
Urine
Journal
Toxicology letters
ISSN: 1879-3169
Titre abrégé: Toxicol Lett
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 7709027
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 Oct 2020
10 Oct 2020
Historique:
received:
07
02
2020
revised:
29
05
2020
accepted:
27
06
2020
pubmed:
3
7
2020
medline:
15
9
2020
entrez:
3
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aim of this study was to assess phthalate exposure of non-occupationally exposed working aged population in Finland. Studied phthalates included diethyl phthalate (DEP), di-n-butyl phthalate (DnBP), diisobutyl phthalate (DiBP), benzyl butyl phthalate (BzBP), dicyclohexyl phthalate (DCHP), di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), diisononyl phthalate (DiNP), diisodecyl phthalate (DiDP), di(2-propylheptyl) phthalate (DPHP), and di-n-octyl phthalate (DnOP). Sample collection campaign took place in 2015. Metabolites of DEP, DnBP and DiBP were detected in all the first morning void urine samples of the non-occupationally exposed volunteers (n = 60; 42 women and 18 men; aged 25-63). Metabolite of BBP and secondary metabolites of DEHP and DiNP were detected in >90% of the samples. MCHP (1.7%), MEHP (18.3%), cx-MiNP (8.3%) and MnOP (1.7%) were less frequently detected. MiNP and OH-MPHP were not detected in any of the urine samples. The observed levels were mostly comparable to the levels published in the adult population in Europe and the US. One notable difference was the observed higher exposure of the Finnish study population to DnBP in comparison to the German, Austrian, Norwegian and US populations. The levels of individual phthalates did not often correlate very well with each other. In most cases, higher exposure to phthalates was seen in females in comparison to males, which is in accordance with other studies. The urinary levels were compared to the biomonitoring equivalents (BEs), which were calculated on the basis of published DNELs (derived no-effect levels). The P95 levels of individual phthalates remained below the respective BEs, the highest risk characterization ratio (RCR) being 0.88 for DnBP and the second highest 0.34 for DiBP. For other phthalates, the RCRs were below 0.2. Using the P95 levels, combined exposure to DnBP, DiBP, DEHP and BBP resulted in risk characterization ratio exceeding 1. This suggests a need to limit the exposure to these phthalates.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32615245
pii: S0378-4274(20)30298-8
doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2020.06.021
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Environmental Pollutants
0
Phthalic Acids
0
phthalic acid
6O7F7IX66E
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
107-117Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.