Diffusion tensor imaging quantifying the severity of chronic hepatitis in rats.
Animals
Carbon Tetrachloride
/ adverse effects
Case-Control Studies
Diffusion Tensor Imaging
/ methods
Disease Models, Animal
Hepatitis, Chronic
/ diagnostic imaging
Humans
Male
Observer Variation
Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
/ methods
Rats
Rats, Sprague-Dawley
Severity of Illness Index
Average diffusion coefficient
Chronic hepatitis
Diffusion tensor imaging
Fractional anisotropy
Liver fibrosis
Journal
BMC medical imaging
ISSN: 1471-2342
Titre abrégé: BMC Med Imaging
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968553
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 07 2020
02 07 2020
Historique:
received:
02
04
2020
accepted:
04
06
2020
entrez:
4
7
2020
pubmed:
4
7
2020
medline:
29
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is mainly used for detecting white matter fiber in the brain. DTI was applied to assess fiber in liver disorders in previous studies. However, the data obtained have been insufficient in determining if DTI can be used to exactly stage chronic hepatitis. This study assessed the value of DTI for staging of liver fibrosis (F), necroinflammatory activity (A) and steatosis (S) with chronic hepatitis in rats. Seventy male Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into a control group(n = 10) and an experimental group(n = 60). The rat models of chronic hepatitis were established by abdominal subcutaneous injections of 40% CCl The count of each pathology was as follows: F0(n = 15), F1(n = 11), F2(n = 6), F3(n = 9), F4(n = 6); A0(n = 8), A1(n = 16), A2(n = 16), A3(n = 7); S0(n = 10), S1(n = 7), S2(n = 3), S3(n = 11), S4(n = 16). The rADC value had a negative correlation with liver fibrosis (r = - 0.392, P = 0.008) and inflammation (r = - 0.359, P = 0.015). The FA value had a positive correlation with fibrosis (r = 0.409, P = 0.005). Significant differences were found in the FA values between F4 and F0 ~ F3 (P = 0.03), while no significant differences among F0 ~ F3 were found (P > 0.05). The AUC of the FA value differentiating F4 from F0 ~ F3 was 0.909 (p < 0.001) with an 83.3% sensitivity and an 85.4% specificity when the FA value was at the cut-off of 588.089 (× 10 The FA value for DTI can distinguish early cirrhosis from normal, mild and moderate liver fibrosis, but the rADC value lacked the ability to differentiate among the fibrotic grades. Both the FA and rADC values were unable to discriminate the stages of necroinflammatory activity and steatosis.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is mainly used for detecting white matter fiber in the brain. DTI was applied to assess fiber in liver disorders in previous studies. However, the data obtained have been insufficient in determining if DTI can be used to exactly stage chronic hepatitis. This study assessed the value of DTI for staging of liver fibrosis (F), necroinflammatory activity (A) and steatosis (S) with chronic hepatitis in rats.
METHODS
Seventy male Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into a control group(n = 10) and an experimental group(n = 60). The rat models of chronic hepatitis were established by abdominal subcutaneous injections of 40% CCl
RESULTS
The count of each pathology was as follows: F0(n = 15), F1(n = 11), F2(n = 6), F3(n = 9), F4(n = 6); A0(n = 8), A1(n = 16), A2(n = 16), A3(n = 7); S0(n = 10), S1(n = 7), S2(n = 3), S3(n = 11), S4(n = 16). The rADC value had a negative correlation with liver fibrosis (r = - 0.392, P = 0.008) and inflammation (r = - 0.359, P = 0.015). The FA value had a positive correlation with fibrosis (r = 0.409, P = 0.005). Significant differences were found in the FA values between F4 and F0 ~ F3 (P = 0.03), while no significant differences among F0 ~ F3 were found (P > 0.05). The AUC of the FA value differentiating F4 from F0 ~ F3 was 0.909 (p < 0.001) with an 83.3% sensitivity and an 85.4% specificity when the FA value was at the cut-off of 588.089 (× 10
CONCLUSION
The FA value for DTI can distinguish early cirrhosis from normal, mild and moderate liver fibrosis, but the rADC value lacked the ability to differentiate among the fibrotic grades. Both the FA and rADC values were unable to discriminate the stages of necroinflammatory activity and steatosis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32615932
doi: 10.1186/s12880-020-00466-3
pii: 10.1186/s12880-020-00466-3
pmc: PMC7333377
doi:
Substances chimiques
Carbon Tetrachloride
CL2T97X0V0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
74Subventions
Organisme : Luzhou-Southwest Medical University Tripartite Project
ID : 2015SX-0037
Pays : International
Références
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010 Nov;32(5):1141-8
pubmed: 21031520
Chin Med J (Engl). 2015 Mar 5;128(5):620-5
pubmed: 25698193
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001 Apr;13(4):534-46
pubmed: 11276097
World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Dec 28;18(48):7225-33
pubmed: 23326127
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2020 Mar;10(3):805-807
pubmed: 32269940
BMC Infect Dis. 2019 Oct 22;19(1):878
pubmed: 31640590
Obes Surg. 2005 Mar;15(3):442-6
pubmed: 15826485
Magn Reson Med. 2015 Apr;73(4):1602-8
pubmed: 24733754
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Jun;41(6):1629-38
pubmed: 25256692
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 May 7;21(17):5138-48
pubmed: 25954087
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Mar 21;20(11):2854-66
pubmed: 24659877
Neurosurg Rev. 2020 Jun;43(3):881-891
pubmed: 30417213
Korean J Intern Med. 2015 Sep;30(5):580-9
pubmed: 26354051
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011 Apr;33(4):882-8
pubmed: 21448953
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jul;28(4):283-288
pubmed: 28594328
Eur J Radiol. 2013 Feb;82(2):203-7
pubmed: 23122674
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017 Oct;46(4):1149-1158
pubmed: 28225568
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012 May;35(5):1108-11
pubmed: 22170763
Magn Reson Med. 2013 Feb;69(2):545-52
pubmed: 23161434
Eur Radiol. 2013 May;23(5):1281-7
pubmed: 23138385
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2017 Feb;42(2):490-501
pubmed: 27678393
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012 Jul;36(1):159-67
pubmed: 22334528
Radiology. 2020 Jan;294(1):98-107
pubmed: 31743083
BMC Gastroenterol. 2020 Apr 6;20(1):89
pubmed: 32252641
Hepatology. 2003 Dec;38(6):1449-57
pubmed: 14647056
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jun 21;20(23):7260-76
pubmed: 24966597
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 Jul;28(1):89-95
pubmed: 18581382