Pregnant women's clinical characteristics, intrapartum interventions, and duration of labour in urban China: a multi-center cross-sectional study.
Adult
Analgesia, Epidural
/ statistics & numerical data
Birth Weight
Body Mass Index
Cardiotocography
Cesarean Section
/ statistics & numerical data
China
Cross-Sectional Studies
Delivery, Obstetric
/ statistics & numerical data
Female
Gestational Weight Gain
Humans
Labor Stage, First
Labor Stage, Second
Labor Stage, Third
Labor, Obstetric
Middle Aged
Oxytocin
/ therapeutic use
Parity
Parturition
Pregnancy
Young Adult
Childbirth
Intrapartum intervention
Labour duration
Normal labour
Journal
BMC pregnancy and childbirth
ISSN: 1471-2393
Titre abrégé: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967799
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 Jul 2020
02 Jul 2020
Historique:
received:
25
02
2020
accepted:
19
06
2020
entrez:
4
7
2020
pubmed:
4
7
2020
medline:
17
2
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
There is an increasing global trend towards the widespread over-medicalisation of labour and childbirth. The present study aimed to investigate pregnant women's clinical characteristics, intrapartum interventions, duration of labour and its associated factors; and to compare the differences of these variables between nulliparas and multiparas in China. A multi-center cross-sectional study was carried out in three tertiary hospitals of Fudan University in Shanghai, China. A total of 1523 participants were approched and assessed for eligibility. Data on women's sociodemographic characteristics, intrapartum interventions, and duration of labour were measured and collected. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to present the curves of total duration of labour by parity. After z-transformation of labour duration, multivariable linear regression was used to control for confounding and to identify independent associations between potential associated factors and the primary outcome of labour duration. Overall, 1209 eligible women agreed to participate and were investigated. Rates of different intrapartum interventions were 27.4% in use of amniotomy, 37.9% in use of oxytocin, 53.0% in continuous electronic fetal monitoring, and 52.9% in epidural use, respectively. The curve of total duration of labour was significantly different between nulliparas and multiparas (P < .001). Of the 1209 participants, 983 (81.3%) women eventually achieved successful vaginal birth while 226 (18.7%) women ended in intrapartum caesarean section. The median duration of total stage of labour was significantly longer in the nulliparous group [9.38 (6.33,14.10) hours] than that in the multiparous group [5.08 (3.00,7.83) hours] (P < .001). The following factors were independently associated with longer duration of total stage of labour: epidural analgesia (P < .001), primiparity (P < .001), continuous electronic fetal monitoring (P = .035), and increased birth weight (P = .005). Intrapartum medical interventions become common obstetric practices in urban China. Multifactorial variables independently associated with longer duration of labour were identified, including epidural analgesia, primiparity, continuous electronic fetal monitoring, and increased birth weight. Further research is required to validate these variables and to determine the modifiable factors for labour management. And models of care with lower intervention rates such as midwife-led models of care should be developed and implemented in China.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
There is an increasing global trend towards the widespread over-medicalisation of labour and childbirth. The present study aimed to investigate pregnant women's clinical characteristics, intrapartum interventions, duration of labour and its associated factors; and to compare the differences of these variables between nulliparas and multiparas in China.
METHODS
METHODS
A multi-center cross-sectional study was carried out in three tertiary hospitals of Fudan University in Shanghai, China. A total of 1523 participants were approched and assessed for eligibility. Data on women's sociodemographic characteristics, intrapartum interventions, and duration of labour were measured and collected. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to present the curves of total duration of labour by parity. After z-transformation of labour duration, multivariable linear regression was used to control for confounding and to identify independent associations between potential associated factors and the primary outcome of labour duration.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Overall, 1209 eligible women agreed to participate and were investigated. Rates of different intrapartum interventions were 27.4% in use of amniotomy, 37.9% in use of oxytocin, 53.0% in continuous electronic fetal monitoring, and 52.9% in epidural use, respectively. The curve of total duration of labour was significantly different between nulliparas and multiparas (P < .001). Of the 1209 participants, 983 (81.3%) women eventually achieved successful vaginal birth while 226 (18.7%) women ended in intrapartum caesarean section. The median duration of total stage of labour was significantly longer in the nulliparous group [9.38 (6.33,14.10) hours] than that in the multiparous group [5.08 (3.00,7.83) hours] (P < .001). The following factors were independently associated with longer duration of total stage of labour: epidural analgesia (P < .001), primiparity (P < .001), continuous electronic fetal monitoring (P = .035), and increased birth weight (P = .005).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Intrapartum medical interventions become common obstetric practices in urban China. Multifactorial variables independently associated with longer duration of labour were identified, including epidural analgesia, primiparity, continuous electronic fetal monitoring, and increased birth weight. Further research is required to validate these variables and to determine the modifiable factors for labour management. And models of care with lower intervention rates such as midwife-led models of care should be developed and implemented in China.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32616073
doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03072-x
pii: 10.1186/s12884-020-03072-x
pmc: PMC7330978
doi:
Substances chimiques
Oxytocin
50-56-6
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
386Subventions
Organisme : School of Nursing, Fudan University
ID : FNF201703
Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Références
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Oct;197(4):428.e1-7
pubmed: 17904990
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Dec;97(52):e13901
pubmed: 30593204
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 21;5:CD000331
pubmed: 29781504
JAMA. 2017 Jan 3;317(1):69-76
pubmed: 28030701
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2017 Aug;138(2):152-157
pubmed: 28485828
Lancet. 2019 Jan 26;393(10169):340-348
pubmed: 30581039
Birth. 2019 Dec;46(4):608-615
pubmed: 31297872
BMJ. 2018 Mar 5;360:k817
pubmed: 29506980
Reprod Health. 2019 May 30;16(1):71
pubmed: 31146759
Midwifery. 2016 Mar;34:221-229
pubmed: 26681573
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013 Aug;288(2):245-54
pubmed: 23417149
Lancet Glob Health. 2017 May;5(5):e523-e536
pubmed: 28341117
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2017 Mar;11:86-90
pubmed: 28159134
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Dec 07;(12):CD009514
pubmed: 22161453
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 03;2:CD006066
pubmed: 28157275
Midwifery. 2017 Oct;53:63-70
pubmed: 28763721
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 08;2:CD000081
pubmed: 28176333
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Jun 1;18(1):192
pubmed: 29855270
Lancet. 1985 Aug 24;2(8452):436-7
pubmed: 2863457
Am J Perinatol. 2015 Jan;32(1):87-92
pubmed: 24839146
Bull World Health Organ. 2012 Jan 1;90(1):30-9, 39A
pubmed: 22271962
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Feb;133(2):406-408
pubmed: 30681540
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Oct 24;18(1):415
pubmed: 30355293
Birth. 1997 Jun;24(2):121-3
pubmed: 9271979
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Apr 02;16:71
pubmed: 27039302
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Jun;60(3):336-343
pubmed: 31486065
BJOG. 2015 Jan;122(2):160-4
pubmed: 25138909
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2016 Sep;38(9):843-865
pubmed: 27670710
Lancet. 2016 Oct 29;388(10056):2176-2192
pubmed: 27642019
Midwifery. 2018 Nov;66:161-167
pubmed: 30176390
Lancet. 2019 Nov 9;394(10210):1750-1763
pubmed: 31604660
Lancet. 2010 Feb 6;375(9713):490-9
pubmed: 20071021
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 18;(6):CD006167
pubmed: 23780653
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 28;4:CD004667
pubmed: 27121907
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2001 Nov;75 Suppl 1:S5-S23
pubmed: 11742639
Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Dec;116(6):1281-1287
pubmed: 21099592
BJOG. 2011 Mar;118(4):391-9
pubmed: 21134103
BJOG. 2016 Apr;123(5):667-70
pubmed: 26681211
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Aug 20;(8):CD003934
pubmed: 23959763
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2014 Dec;5(4):160-4
pubmed: 25433823
Bull World Health Organ. 2013 Dec 1;91(12):914-922D
pubmed: 24347730