Combi-CRISPR: combination of NHEJ and HDR provides efficient and precise plasmid-based knock-ins in mice and rats.
Animals
CRISPR-Cas Systems
/ genetics
DNA
/ genetics
DNA End-Joining Repair
/ genetics
Exons
/ genetics
Female
Gene Editing
/ methods
Gene Knock-In Techniques
/ methods
Genome
/ genetics
Introns
/ genetics
Mice
Mice, Inbred C57BL
Mutation
/ genetics
Plasmids
/ genetics
Rats
Rats, Long-Evans
Rats, Wistar
Recombinational DNA Repair
/ genetics
Journal
Human genetics
ISSN: 1432-1203
Titre abrégé: Hum Genet
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 7613873
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2021
Feb 2021
Historique:
received:
29
02
2020
accepted:
19
06
2020
pubmed:
4
7
2020
medline:
16
2
2021
entrez:
4
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
CRISPR-Cas9 are widely used for gene targeting in mice and rats. The non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) repair pathway, which is dominant in zygotes, efficiently induces insertion or deletion (indel) mutations as gene knockouts at targeted sites, whereas gene knock-ins (KIs) via homology-directed repair (HDR) are difficult to generate. In this study, we used a double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) donor template with Cas9 and two single guide RNAs, one designed to cut the targeted genome sequences and the other to cut both the flanked genomic region and one homology arm of the dsDNA plasmid, which resulted in 20-33% KI efficiency among G0 pups. G0 KI mice carried NHEJ-dependent indel mutations at one targeting site that was designed at the intron region, and HDR-dependent precise KIs of the various donor cassettes spanning from 1 to 5 kbp, such as EGFP, mCherry, Cre, and genes of interest, at the other exon site. These findings indicate that this combinatorial method of NHEJ and HDR mediated by the CRISPR-Cas9 system facilitates the efficient and precise KIs of plasmid DNA cassettes in mice and rats.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32617796
doi: 10.1007/s00439-020-02198-4
pii: 10.1007/s00439-020-02198-4
pmc: PMC7864826
doi:
Substances chimiques
DNA
9007-49-2
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
277-287Références
Dev Growth Differ. 2014 Jan;56(1):46-52
pubmed: 24372523
Genome Biol. 2017 Feb 20;18(1):35
pubmed: 28219395
BMC Genomics. 2018 May 2;19(1):318
pubmed: 29720086
Nat Commun. 2014 Nov 20;5:5560
pubmed: 25410609
Cell. 2013 Sep 12;154(6):1370-9
pubmed: 23992847
Genetics. 2015 Jun;200(2):423-30
pubmed: 25819794
Cell Res. 2017 Jun;27(6):801-814
pubmed: 28524166
FEBS J. 2014 Sep;281(17):3779-90
pubmed: 25039742
Genome Res. 2013 Mar;23(3):539-46
pubmed: 23152450
Nat Biotechnol. 2015 Sep;33(9):985-989
pubmed: 26121415
Nat Biotechnol. 2015 May;33(5):538-42
pubmed: 25798939
Sci Rep. 2015 Aug 05;5:12799
pubmed: 26242611
Nature. 2016 Dec 1;540(7631):144-149
pubmed: 27851729
Sci Rep. 2014 Oct 01;4:6382
pubmed: 25269785
Cell Rep. 2016 Mar 8;14(9):2263-2272
pubmed: 26923600
Nat Biotechnol. 2018 Aug;36(7):632-637
pubmed: 29889212
Dev Cell. 2018 May 21;45(4):526-536.e5
pubmed: 29787711
Cell. 2013 May 9;153(4):910-8
pubmed: 23643243
Nat Biotechnol. 2014 Apr;32(4):347-55
pubmed: 24584096
Nat Commun. 2016 Jan 28;7:10548
pubmed: 26817820
Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 May 19;44(9):e85
pubmed: 26850641
Trends Biotechnol. 2013 Jul;31(7):397-405
pubmed: 23664777
Genome Biol. 2015 Apr 29;16:87
pubmed: 25924609
Genome Biol. 2017 May 17;18(1):92
pubmed: 28511701
Nat Commun. 2014 Jun 26;5:4240
pubmed: 24967838
Nat Commun. 2016 Jan 20;7:10431
pubmed: 26786405
Development. 2014 Nov;141(21):4042-54
pubmed: 25336735
Genome Res. 2014 Jan;24(1):142-53
pubmed: 24179142
Cell Res. 2019 Oct;29(10):804-819
pubmed: 31444470
EMBO J. 2018 Sep 14;37(18):
pubmed: 30087111
Sci Rep. 2014 Jun 23;4:5396
pubmed: 24953798