Post-transplant cyclophosphamide versus antithymocyte globulin in patients with acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation from 10/10 HLA-matched unrelated donors.
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Allografts
Antilymphocyte Serum
/ therapeutic use
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ therapeutic use
Cause of Death
Combined Modality Therapy
Cyclophosphamide
/ therapeutic use
Disease-Free Survival
Female
Graft Survival
Graft vs Host Disease
/ drug therapy
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
/ adverse effects
Histocompatibility
Humans
Immunosuppressive Agents
/ therapeutic use
Incidence
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute
/ drug therapy
Male
Middle Aged
Propensity Score
Recurrence
Remission Induction
Retrospective Studies
Unrelated Donors
Young Adult
Acute myeloid leukemia
Antithymocyte globulin
Matched unrelated donor
Post-transplant cyclophosphamide
Journal
Journal of hematology & oncology
ISSN: 1756-8722
Titre abrégé: J Hematol Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101468937
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 07 2020
03 07 2020
Historique:
received:
18
05
2020
accepted:
23
06
2020
entrez:
5
7
2020
pubmed:
6
7
2020
medline:
18
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) remains a major contributor to mortality and morbidity after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). The updated recommendations suggest that rabbit antithymocyte globulin or anti-T-lymphocyte globulin (ATG) should be used for GVHD prophylaxis in patients undergoing matched-unrelated donor (MUD) allo-HSCT. More recently, using post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCY) in the haploidentical setting has resulted in low incidences of both acute (aGVHD) and chronic GVHD (cGVHD). Therefore, the aim of our study was to compare GVHD prophylaxis using either PTCY or ATG in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who underwent allo-HSCT in first remission (CR1) from a 10/10 HLA-MUD. Overall, 174 and 1452 patients from the EBMT registry receiving PTCY and ATG were included. Cumulative incidence of aGVHD and cGVHD, leukemia-free survival, overall survival, non-relapse mortality, cumulative incidence of relapse, and refined GVHD-free, relapse-free survival were compared between the 2 groups. Propensity score matching was also performed in order to confirm the results of the main analysis RESULTS: No statistical difference between the PTCY and ATG groups was observed for the incidence of grade II-IV aGVHD. The same held true for the incidence of cGVHD and for extensive cGVHD. In univariate and multivariate analyses, no statistical differences were observed for all other transplant outcomes. These results were also confirmed using matched-pair analysis. These results highlight that, in the10/10 HLA-MUD setting, the use of PTCY for GVHD prophylaxis may provide similar outcomes to those obtained with ATG in patients with AML in CR1.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) remains a major contributor to mortality and morbidity after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). The updated recommendations suggest that rabbit antithymocyte globulin or anti-T-lymphocyte globulin (ATG) should be used for GVHD prophylaxis in patients undergoing matched-unrelated donor (MUD) allo-HSCT. More recently, using post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCY) in the haploidentical setting has resulted in low incidences of both acute (aGVHD) and chronic GVHD (cGVHD). Therefore, the aim of our study was to compare GVHD prophylaxis using either PTCY or ATG in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who underwent allo-HSCT in first remission (CR1) from a 10/10 HLA-MUD.
METHODS
Overall, 174 and 1452 patients from the EBMT registry receiving PTCY and ATG were included. Cumulative incidence of aGVHD and cGVHD, leukemia-free survival, overall survival, non-relapse mortality, cumulative incidence of relapse, and refined GVHD-free, relapse-free survival were compared between the 2 groups. Propensity score matching was also performed in order to confirm the results of the main analysis RESULTS: No statistical difference between the PTCY and ATG groups was observed for the incidence of grade II-IV aGVHD. The same held true for the incidence of cGVHD and for extensive cGVHD. In univariate and multivariate analyses, no statistical differences were observed for all other transplant outcomes. These results were also confirmed using matched-pair analysis.
CONCLUSION
These results highlight that, in the10/10 HLA-MUD setting, the use of PTCY for GVHD prophylaxis may provide similar outcomes to those obtained with ATG in patients with AML in CR1.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32620146
doi: 10.1186/s13045-020-00923-0
pii: 10.1186/s13045-020-00923-0
pmc: PMC7333262
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antilymphocyte Serum
0
Immunosuppressive Agents
0
Cyclophosphamide
8N3DW7272P
thymoglobulin
D7RD81HE4W
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
87Références
Blood. 2010 Apr 22;115(16):3224-30
pubmed: 20124511
N Engl J Med. 2017 Nov 30;377(22):2167-2179
pubmed: 29171820
Lancet. 2005 Aug 27-Sep 2;366(9487):733-41
pubmed: 16125590
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec 20;35(36):4003-4011
pubmed: 29040031
Stat Med. 1999 Jun 30;18(12):1489-500
pubmed: 10398287
Bone Marrow Transplant. 1995 Jun;15(6):825-8
pubmed: 7581076
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jan 7;374(1):43-53
pubmed: 26735993
Leukemia. 2020 Apr;34(4):1144-1153
pubmed: 31728052
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Apr 1;31(10):1310-6
pubmed: 23423745
Leukemia. 2011 Jun;25(6):932-8
pubmed: 21350556
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Feb 20;28(6):1011-6
pubmed: 20065176
Blood Adv. 2020 Mar 24;4(6):983-992
pubmed: 32168378
Lancet Oncol. 2009 Sep;10(9):855-64
pubmed: 19695955
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jun 1;29(16):2230-9
pubmed: 21464398
Lifetime Data Anal. 1995;1(3):255-73
pubmed: 9385105
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2018 Apr;53(4):431-437
pubmed: 29330391
N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 28;377(26):2565-2579
pubmed: 29281578
J Immunol. 1990 Sep 1;145(5):1303-10
pubmed: 2143514
Br J Haematol. 2019 Feb;184(4):643-646
pubmed: 29468648
Sci Transl Med. 2013 Nov 13;5(211):211ra157
pubmed: 24225944
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Feb;17(2):164-173
pubmed: 26723083
J Hematol Oncol. 2018 Mar 15;11(1):40
pubmed: 29544522
Clin Transplant. 2013 Jul-Aug;27(4):E368-74
pubmed: 23701240
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2003 Apr;9(4):215-33
pubmed: 12720215
Lancet Haematol. 2017 Jun;4(6):e293-e301
pubmed: 28583289
Leukemia. 2007 Jul;21(7):1387-94
pubmed: 17410187
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2017 Mar;23(3):459-466
pubmed: 28039079
Blood. 2001 Nov 15;98(10):2942-7
pubmed: 11698275
J Exp Med. 1989 Jan 1;169(1):213-38
pubmed: 2642528
Blood. 2019 Sep 12;134(11):892-899
pubmed: 31270102
Lancet Haematol. 2020 Feb;7(2):e157-e167
pubmed: 32004485
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2008 Jun;14(6):641-50
pubmed: 18489989
Blood. 2011 Jun 23;117(25):6963-70
pubmed: 21464372
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2018 Jun;24(6):1196-1202
pubmed: 29410343
Cancer. 2013 Mar 1;119(5):986-92
pubmed: 23096591
Blood. 2016 Mar 17;127(11):1502-8
pubmed: 26764356
J Clin Invest. 2019 Mar 26;129(6):2357-2373
pubmed: 30913039
Blood. 2014 Sep 25;124(13):2131-41
pubmed: 25139358
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2014 Mar;49(3):389-96
pubmed: 24419525