Actual Five-year Survival After Upfront Resection for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Who Beats the Odds?


Journal

Annals of surgery
ISSN: 1528-1140
Titre abrégé: Ann Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0372354

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 05 2022
Historique:
pubmed: 11 7 2020
medline: 14 5 2022
entrez: 11 7 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To determine actual five-year survival (5YS) rates associated with a strategy of upfront surgery and adjuvant therapy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The rate of actual 5YS in PDAC remains controversial. Available data is restricted to cohorts acquired over several decades and series of resection after patient selection by neoadjuvant therapy. All patients undergoing upfront resection for resectable and borderline-resectable PDAC from 10/2001 to 12/2011 were identified from a prospective database. Actual overall survival was assessed after a follow-up of at least 5 years. Uni- and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. Median survival of 937 patients was 22.1 months. The actual 5YS rate was 17.0% (n = 159) including 89 (9.5%) patients without evidence of disease >5 years after resection. 5YS rates in patients with or without adjuvanttherapy were 18.8% vs. 12.2%, respectively. Tumorgrading, number of positive lymph nodes, a context of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasia, and vascular resections were independently associated with 5YS. Patient-related parameters and CA 19-9 levels were associated with observed survival up to 3 years, but lost relevance thereafter. The extent of lymph node involvement was the strongest predictor of 5YS. Patients with pN0R0 had a 5YS rate of 38.2%. in patients with exclusively favorable factors the observed 5YS rate was above 50%. This is the largest series of long-term survivors with histologically confirmed PDAC. With upfront resection and adjuvant therapy an actual overall 5YS rate of 18.8% can be expected. in favorable subgroups actual 5YS is above 50%.

Sections du résumé

OBJECTIVE
To determine actual five-year survival (5YS) rates associated with a strategy of upfront surgery and adjuvant therapy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).
BACKGROUND
The rate of actual 5YS in PDAC remains controversial. Available data is restricted to cohorts acquired over several decades and series of resection after patient selection by neoadjuvant therapy.
METHODS
All patients undergoing upfront resection for resectable and borderline-resectable PDAC from 10/2001 to 12/2011 were identified from a prospective database. Actual overall survival was assessed after a follow-up of at least 5 years. Uni- and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed.
RESULTS
Median survival of 937 patients was 22.1 months. The actual 5YS rate was 17.0% (n = 159) including 89 (9.5%) patients without evidence of disease >5 years after resection. 5YS rates in patients with or without adjuvanttherapy were 18.8% vs. 12.2%, respectively. Tumorgrading, number of positive lymph nodes, a context of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasia, and vascular resections were independently associated with 5YS. Patient-related parameters and CA 19-9 levels were associated with observed survival up to 3 years, but lost relevance thereafter. The extent of lymph node involvement was the strongest predictor of 5YS. Patients with pN0R0 had a 5YS rate of 38.2%. in patients with exclusively favorable factors the observed 5YS rate was above 50%.
CONCLUSIONS
This is the largest series of long-term survivors with histologically confirmed PDAC. With upfront resection and adjuvant therapy an actual overall 5YS rate of 18.8% can be expected. in favorable subgroups actual 5YS is above 50%.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32649469
pii: 00000658-202205000-00021
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004147
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

962-971

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Références

Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin 2018; 68:7–30.
Rahib L, Smith BD, Aizenberg R, et al. Projecting cancer incidence and deaths to 2030: the unexpected burden of thyroid, liver, and pancreas cancers in the United States. Cancer Res 2014; 74:2913–2921.
Strobel O, Neoptolemos J, Jager D, et al. Optimizing the outcomes of pancreatic cancer surgery. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2019; 16:11–26.
Kleeff J, Korc M, Apte M, et al. Pancreatic cancer. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2016; 2:16022.
Ranstam J, Cook JA. Kaplan-Meier curve. Br J Surg 2017; 104:442.
Gudjonsson B. Pancreatic cancer: survival, errors and evidence. EurJ Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009; 21:1379–1382.
Gudjonsson B. Pancreatic cancer: 80 years of surgery-percentage and repetitions. HPB Surg 2016; 2016:6839687.
Ferrone CR, Pieretti-Vanmarcke R, Bloom JP, et al. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: long-term survival does not equal cure. Surgery 2012; 152: (3 Suppl 1): S43–S49.
Ferrone CR, Brennan MF, Gonen M, et al. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: the actual 5-year survivors. J Gastrointest Surg 2008; 12:701–706.
Katz MH, Wang H, Fleming JB, et al. Long-term survival after multidisciplinary management of resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2009; 16:836–847.
Schnelldorfer T, Ware AL, Sarr MG, et al. Long-term survival after pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: is cure possible? Ann Surg 2008; 247:456–462.
Paniccia A, Hosokawa P, Henderson W, et al. Characteristics of 10-year survivorsofpancreaticductaladenocarcinoma. JAMASurg 2015; 150:701–710.
von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 2007; 370:1453–1457.
Bockhorn M, Uzunoglu FG, Adham M, et al. Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: a consensus statement by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 2014; 155:977–988.
Hartwig W, Vollmer CM, Fingerhut A, et al. Extended pancreatectomy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: definition and consensus of the International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 2014; 156:1–14.
Weitz J, Rahbari N, Koch M, et al. The “artery first” approach for resection of pancreatic head cancer. J Am Coll Surg 2010; 210:e1–e4.
Sanjay P, Takaori K, Govil S, et al. ‘Artery-first’ approaches to pancreatoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 2012; 99:1027–1035.
Tol JA, Gouma DJ, Bassi C, et al. Definition of a standard lymphadenectomy in surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a consensus statement by the International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 2014; 156:591–600.
Strobel O, Hinz U, Gluth A, et al. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: number of positive nodes allows to distinguish several N categories. Ann Surg 2015; 261:961–969.
Neoptolemos JP, Dunn JA, Stocken DD, et al. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy in resectable pancreatic cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2001; 358:1576–1585.
Neoptolemos JP, Palmer DH, Ghaneh P, et al. Comparison of adjuvant gemcitabine and capecitabine with gemcitabine monotherapy in patients with resected pancreatic cancer (ESPAC-4): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2017; 389:1011–1024.
Neoptolemos JP, Stocken DD, Bassi C, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus folinic acid vs gemcitabine following pancreatic cancer resection: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2010; 304:1073–1081.
Schmidt J, Abel U, Debus J, et al. Open-label, multicenter, randomized phase III trial of adjuvant chemoradiation plus interferon Alfa-2b versus fluorouracil and folinic acid for patients with resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30:4077–4083.
Strobel O, Hank T, Hinz U, et al. Pancreatic cancer surgery: the new R-status counts. Ann Surg 2017; 265:565–573.
Hank T, Hinz U, Tarantino I, et al. Validation of at least 1 mm as cut-off for resection margins for pancreatic adenocarcinoma of the body and tail. Br J Surg 2018; 105:1171–1181.
Seufferlein T, Porzner M, Becker T, et al. S3-guideline exocrine pancreatic cancer. Z Gastroenterol 2013; 51:1395–1440.
Gudjonsson B. Survival statistics gone awry: pancreatic cancer, a case in point. J Clin Gastroenterol 2002; 35:180–184.
Mokdad AA, Minter RM, Zhu H, et al. Neoadjuvant therapy followed by resection versus upfront resection for resectable pancreatic cancer: a propensity score matched analysis. J Clin Oncol 2017; 35:515–522.
Oettle H, Post S, Neuhaus P, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine vs observation in patients undergoing curative-intent resection of pancreatic cancer: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2007; 297:267–277.
Conroy T, Hammel P, Hebbar M, et al. FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine as adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer. NEngl J Med 2018; 379:2395–2406.
Barrett MT, Deiotte R, Lenkiewicz E, et al. Clinical study of genomic drivers in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Br J Cancer 2017; 117:572–582.
Balachandran VP, Luksza M, Zhao JN, et al. Identification of unique neoantigen qualities in long-term survivors of pancreatic cancer. Nature 2017; 551:512–516.

Auteurs

Oliver Strobel (O)

Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

Philipp Lorenz (P)

Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

Ulf Hinz (U)

Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

Matthias Gaida (M)

Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.

Anna-Katharina König (AK)

Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

Thomas Hank (T)

Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

Willem Niesen (W)

Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

J Ö Rg Kaiser (JÖR)

Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

Mohammed Al-Saeedi (M)

Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

Frank Bergmann (F)

Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Clinical Pathology, Klinikum Darmstadt GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany.

Christoph Springfeld (C)

National Center for Tumor Diseases, Department of Medical Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

Christoph Berchtold (C)

Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

Markus K Diener (MK)

Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

Martin Schneider (M)

Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

Arianeb Mehrabi (A)

Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

Beat P Müller-Stich (BP)

Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

Thilo Hackert (T)

Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

Dirk Jager (D)

National Center for Tumor Diseases, Department of Medical Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

Markus W Büchler (MW)

Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH