Network Meta-analysis for the Diagnostic Approach to Pathologic Nipple Discharge.
Breast cancer
Cytology
Diagnosis
Ductoscopy
MRI
Mammography
Ultrasound
Journal
Clinical breast cancer
ISSN: 1938-0666
Titre abrégé: Clin Breast Cancer
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100898731
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2020
12 2020
Historique:
received:
20
04
2020
revised:
27
05
2020
accepted:
30
05
2020
pubmed:
16
7
2020
medline:
12
10
2021
entrez:
16
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Pathologic nipple discharge (PND) is one of the most common breast-related complaints for referral because of its supposed association with breast cancer. The aim of this network meta-analysis (NMA) was to compare the diagnostic efficacy of ultrasound, mammogram, cytology, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and ductoscopy in patients with PND, as well as to determine the best diagnostic strategy to assess the risk of malignancy as cause for PND. Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase were searched to collect relevant literature from the inception of each of the diagnostic methods until January 27, 2020. The search yielded 1472 original citations, of which 36 studies with 3764 patients were finally included for analysis. Direct and indirect comparisons were performed using an NMA approach to evaluate the combined odd ratios and to determine the surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA) of the diagnostic value of different imaging methods for the detection of breast cancer in patients with PND. Additionally, a subgroup meta-analysis comparing ductoscopy to MRI when conventional imaging was negative was also performed. According to this NMA, sensitivity for detection of malignancy in patients with PND was highest for MRI (83%), followed by ductoscopy (58%), ultrasound (50%), cytology (38%), and mammogram (22%). Specificity was highest for mammogram (93%) followed by ductoscopy (92%), cytology (90%), MRI (76%), and ultrasound (69%). Diagnostic accuracy was the highest for ductoscopy (88%), followed by cytology (82%), MRI (77%), mammogram (76%), and ultrasound (65%). Subgroup meta-analysis (comparing ductoscopy to MRI when ultrasound and mammogram were negative) showed no significant difference in sensitivity, but ductoscopy was statistically significantly better with regard to specificity and diagnostic accuracy. The results from this NMA indicate that although ultrasound and mammogram may remain low-cost useful first choices for the detection of malignancy in patients with PND, ductoscopy outperforms most imaging techniques (especially MRI) and cytology.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32665191
pii: S1526-8209(20)30143-9
doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2020.05.015
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e723-e748Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.