A promising approach for screening pulmonary hypertension based on frontal chest radiographs using deep learning: A retrospective study.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
29
04
2020
accepted:
03
07
2020
entrez:
25
7
2020
pubmed:
25
7
2020
medline:
2
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To date, the missed diagnosis rate of pulmonary hypertension (PH) was high, and there has been limited development of a rapid, simple, and effective way to screen the disease. The purpose of this study is to develop a deep learning approach to achieve rapid detection of possible abnormalities in chest radiographs suggesting PH for screening patients suspected of PH. We retrospectively collected frontal chest radiographs and the pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) value measured by Doppler transthoracic echocardiography from 762 patients (357 healthy controls and 405 with PH) from three institutes in China from January 2013 to May 2019. The wohle sample comprised 762 images (641 for training, 80 for internal test, and 41 for external test). We firstly performed a 8-fold cross-validation on the 641 images selected for training (561 for pre-training, 80 for validation), then decided to tune learning rate to 0.0008 according to the best score on validation data. Finally, we used all the pre-training and validation data (561+80 = 641) to train our models (Resnet50, Xception, and Inception V3), evaluated them on internal and external test dataset to classify the images as having manifestations of PH or healthy according to the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC/ROC). After that, the three deep learning models were further used for prediction of PASP using regression algorithm. Moreover, we invited an experienced chest radiologist to classify the images in the test dataset as having PH or not, and compared the prediction accuracy performed by deep learing models with that of manual classification. The AUC performed by the best model (Inception V3) achieved 0.970 in the internal test, and slightly declined in the external test (0.967) when using deep learning algorithms to classify PH from normal based on chest X-rays. The mean absolute error (MAE) of the best model for prediction of PASP value was smaller in the internal test (7.45) compared to 9.95 in the external test. Manual classification of PH based on chest X-rays showed much lower AUCs compared to that performed by deep learning models both in the internal and external test. The present study used deep learning algorithms to classify abnormalities suggesting PH in chest radiographs with high accuracy and good generalizability. Once tested prospectively in clinical settings, the technology could provide a non-invasive and easy-to-use method to screen patients suspected of having PH.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
To date, the missed diagnosis rate of pulmonary hypertension (PH) was high, and there has been limited development of a rapid, simple, and effective way to screen the disease. The purpose of this study is to develop a deep learning approach to achieve rapid detection of possible abnormalities in chest radiographs suggesting PH for screening patients suspected of PH.
METHODS
We retrospectively collected frontal chest radiographs and the pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) value measured by Doppler transthoracic echocardiography from 762 patients (357 healthy controls and 405 with PH) from three institutes in China from January 2013 to May 2019. The wohle sample comprised 762 images (641 for training, 80 for internal test, and 41 for external test). We firstly performed a 8-fold cross-validation on the 641 images selected for training (561 for pre-training, 80 for validation), then decided to tune learning rate to 0.0008 according to the best score on validation data. Finally, we used all the pre-training and validation data (561+80 = 641) to train our models (Resnet50, Xception, and Inception V3), evaluated them on internal and external test dataset to classify the images as having manifestations of PH or healthy according to the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC/ROC). After that, the three deep learning models were further used for prediction of PASP using regression algorithm. Moreover, we invited an experienced chest radiologist to classify the images in the test dataset as having PH or not, and compared the prediction accuracy performed by deep learing models with that of manual classification.
RESULTS
The AUC performed by the best model (Inception V3) achieved 0.970 in the internal test, and slightly declined in the external test (0.967) when using deep learning algorithms to classify PH from normal based on chest X-rays. The mean absolute error (MAE) of the best model for prediction of PASP value was smaller in the internal test (7.45) compared to 9.95 in the external test. Manual classification of PH based on chest X-rays showed much lower AUCs compared to that performed by deep learning models both in the internal and external test.
CONCLUSIONS
The present study used deep learning algorithms to classify abnormalities suggesting PH in chest radiographs with high accuracy and good generalizability. Once tested prospectively in clinical settings, the technology could provide a non-invasive and easy-to-use method to screen patients suspected of having PH.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32706807
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236378
pii: PONE-D-20-12503
pmc: PMC7380616
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0236378Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Nat Med. 2018 Oct;24(10):1559-1567
pubmed: 30224757
Radiol Phys Technol. 2017 Sep;10(3):257-273
pubmed: 28689314
Acta Radiol. 2015 May;56(5):552-6
pubmed: 24917607
Eur Heart J. 2016 Jan 1;37(1):67-119
pubmed: 26320113
Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2017 Jun 21;19:221-248
pubmed: 28301734
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 4;13(10):e0204155
pubmed: 30286097
Eur Heart J. 2014 Aug 1;35(29):1925-31
pubmed: 24898551
Onco Targets Ther. 2015 Aug 04;8:2015-22
pubmed: 26346558
Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2012 Dec;33(6):535-51
pubmed: 23168063
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2016 May;35(5):1285-98
pubmed: 26886976
Cell. 2018 Feb 22;172(5):1122-1131.e9
pubmed: 29474911
J Intensive Care Med. 2004 Sep-Oct;19(5):291-6
pubmed: 15358948
Circulation. 2009 May 26;119(20):2663-70
pubmed: 19433755
Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2007 Jun-Jul;31(4-5):198-211
pubmed: 17349778
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Dec 24;62(25 Suppl):D42-50
pubmed: 24355641
Chest. 2004 Jul;126(1 Suppl):14S-34S
pubmed: 15249493
Postgrad Med J. 2012 May;88(1039):271-9
pubmed: 22267542
Nat Med. 2019 Jul;25(7):1054-1056
pubmed: 31160815
Radiology. 2017 Aug;284(2):574-582
pubmed: 28436741
J Am Heart Assoc. 2014 Aug 21;3(4):
pubmed: 25146706
Nature. 2015 May 28;521(7553):436-44
pubmed: 26017442
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Dec 24;62(25 Suppl):D34-41
pubmed: 24355639
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Dec 19;48(12):2546-52
pubmed: 17174196
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Sep;19(9):1180-1191
pubmed: 30120041
PLoS Med. 2018 Nov 6;15(11):e1002683
pubmed: 30399157
PLoS Med. 2018 Nov 20;15(11):e1002697
pubmed: 30457991
PLoS Med. 2018 Nov 20;15(11):e1002686
pubmed: 30457988
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010 Jul;23(7):685-713; quiz 786-8
pubmed: 20620859
Neuroimage. 2015 Mar;108:214-24
pubmed: 25562829
Invest Radiol. 2017 May;52(5):281-287
pubmed: 27922974
Nat Med. 2019 Sep;25(9):1453-1457
pubmed: 31406351
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Jun 30;54(1 Suppl):S55-66
pubmed: 19555859