Transport properties in CFTR-/- knockout piglets suggest normal airway surface liquid pH and enhanced amiloride-sensitive Na
Amiloride
/ pharmacology
Animals
Anoctamins
/ genetics
Bronchi
/ cytology
Cells, Cultured
Cystic Fibrosis
/ metabolism
Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator
/ genetics
Epithelial Sodium Channel Blockers
/ pharmacology
Epithelial Sodium Channels
/ genetics
Hydrogen-Ion Concentration
Intestinal Absorption
Intestinal Mucosa
/ drug effects
Respiratory Mucosa
/ drug effects
Respiratory Tract Absorption
Sodium
/ metabolism
Swine
Airways
Bicarbonate transport
CFTR
CFTR−/− piglets
Chloride secretion
Cystic fibrosis
Intestinal epithelium
Journal
Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology
ISSN: 1432-2013
Titre abrégé: Pflugers Arch
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 0154720
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2020
10 2020
Historique:
received:
17
04
2020
accepted:
17
07
2020
revised:
12
07
2020
pubmed:
28
7
2020
medline:
6
7
2021
entrez:
27
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Previous analysis of CFTR-knockout (CFTR-/-) in piglets has provided important insights into the pathology of cystic fibrosis. However, controversies exist as to the true contribution of CFTR to the pH balance in airways and intestine. We therefore compared ion transport properties in newborn wild-type (CFTR+/+) and CFTR-knockout (CFTR-/- piglets). Tracheas of CFTR-/- piglets demonstrated typical cartilage malformations and muscle cell bundles. CFTR-/- airway epithelial cells showed enhanced lipid peroxidation, suggesting inflammation early in life. CFTR was mainly expressed in airway submucosal glands and was absent in lungs of CFTR-/- piglets, while expression of TMEM16A was uncompromised. mRNA levels for TMEM16A, TMEM16F, and αβγENaC were unchanged in CFTR-/- airways, while mRNA for SLC26A9 appeared reduced. CFTR was undetectable in epithelial cells of CFTR-/- airways and intestine. Small intestinal epithelium of CFTR-/- piglets showed mucus accumulation. Secretion of both electrolytes and mucus was activated by stimulation with prostaglandin E2 and ATP in the intestine of CFTR+/+, but not of CFTR-/- animals. pH was measured inside small bronchi using a pH microelectrode and revealed no difference between CFTR+/+ and CFTR-/- piglets. Intracellular pH in porcine airway epithelial cells revealed only a small contribution of CFTR to bicarbonate secretion, which was absent in cells from CFTR-/- piglets. In contrast to earlier reports, our data suggest a minor impact of CFTR on ASL pH. In contrast, enhanced amiloride-sensitive Na
Identifiants
pubmed: 32712714
doi: 10.1007/s00424-020-02440-y
pii: 10.1007/s00424-020-02440-y
pmc: PMC7476968
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anoctamins
0
Epithelial Sodium Channel Blockers
0
Epithelial Sodium Channels
0
Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator
126880-72-6
Amiloride
7DZO8EB0Z3
Sodium
9NEZ333N27
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1507-1519Références
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2019 Feb;30(2):228-242
pubmed: 30606785
J Clin Invest. 2010 Sep;120(9):3161-6
pubmed: 20739758
Eur Respir J. 2018 Dec 6;52(6):
pubmed: 30361244
J Biol Chem. 2011 Nov 25;286(47):41069-82
pubmed: 21914796
FASEB J. 2019 Mar;33(3):4502-4512
pubmed: 30586313
Mol Biol Cell. 2010 Aug 1;21(15):2639-48
pubmed: 20554763
J Clin Invest. 2015 Mar 2;125(3):1056-68
pubmed: 25642775
Sci Rep. 2017 Sep 29;7(1):12397
pubmed: 28963502
J Physiol. 2013 Nov 1;591(21):5273-8
pubmed: 23959675
Cell Signal. 2018 Apr;44:10-19
pubmed: 29331508
Science. 2014 Aug 15;345(6198):818-22
pubmed: 25124441
Front Physiol. 2019 Oct 04;10:1262
pubmed: 31680994
Nat Commun. 2017 Nov 10;8(1):1409
pubmed: 29123085
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010 Nov 15;182(10):1251-61
pubmed: 20622026
J Mol Med (Berl). 2012 May;90(5):597-608
pubmed: 22170306
J Pharm Pharmacol. 2008 Jan;60(1):63-70
pubmed: 18088506
Front Pharmacol. 2019 Jan 29;10:3
pubmed: 30761000
J Vis Exp. 2019 Jun 13;(148):
pubmed: 31259916
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jun 21;108(25):10260-5
pubmed: 21646513
Cell. 2010 Dec 10;143(6):911-23
pubmed: 21145458
Eur Respir J. 2019 Jul 11;54(1):
pubmed: 31023850
J Cyst Fibros. 2011 Jun;10 Suppl 2:S152-71
pubmed: 21658634
J Biol Chem. 2002 Aug 2;277(31):28167-75
pubmed: 12011087
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jan 2;110(1):360-5
pubmed: 23248295
Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2019 Jun;60(6):705-716
pubmed: 30742493
J Cyst Fibros. 2007 Jul;6(4):304-8
pubmed: 17223612
JCI Insight. 2019 Aug 8;4(15):
pubmed: 31391337
Science. 2016 Jan 29;351(6272):503-7
pubmed: 26823428
J Clin Invest. 1986 Nov;78(5):1245-52
pubmed: 3771796
Sci Transl Med. 2011 Mar 16;3(74):74ra24
pubmed: 21411740
Physiol Rev. 1999 Jan;79(1 Suppl):S193-214
pubmed: 9922382
Sci Rep. 2019 Apr 24;9(1):6516
pubmed: 31019198
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2013 Feb 1;304(3):L184-90
pubmed: 23204069
J Clin Invest. 1998 Jul 1;102(1):15-21
pubmed: 9649552
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2002 Aug;283(2):L329-35
pubmed: 12114194
Am J Physiol. 1998 Dec;275(6):G1274-81
pubmed: 9843763
J Clin Invest. 2001 Feb;107(3):317-24
pubmed: 11160155
Sci Rep. 2016 Oct 27;6:36016
pubmed: 27786259
Thorax. 1997 Jun;52(6):557-60
pubmed: 9227724
J Med Genet. 2020 Jun 2;:
pubmed: 32487539
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Aug 26;111(34):12396-401
pubmed: 25114233
J Cyst Fibros. 2019 Nov;18(6):781-789
pubmed: 31031161
Science. 2008 Sep 26;321(5897):1837-41
pubmed: 18818360
J Mol Med (Berl). 2019 May;97(5):711-722
pubmed: 30915480
J Biol Chem. 2016 Sep 23;291(39):20345-52
pubmed: 27510033
Methods Mol Med. 2005;107:183-206
pubmed: 15492373
PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e24880
pubmed: 21931865
Nature. 2012 Jul 04;487(7405):109-13
pubmed: 22763554
JOP. 2001 Jul;2(4 Suppl):274-9
pubmed: 11875271
Am J Physiol. 1998 May;274(5):L762-6
pubmed: 9612291
Sci Transl Med. 2010 Apr 28;2(29):29ra31
pubmed: 20427821
Am J Physiol. 1994 May;266(5 Pt 1):C1478-83
pubmed: 7515571
FASEB J. 2016 Jun;30(6):2187-97
pubmed: 26932931