Effect of Intravenous Acetaminophen on Postoperative Hypoxemia After Abdominal Surgery: The FACTOR Randomized Clinical Trial.
Acetaminophen
/ administration & dosage
Analgesics, Non-Narcotic
/ administration & dosage
Analgesics, Opioid
/ adverse effects
Double-Blind Method
Female
Humans
Hypoxia
/ drug therapy
Infusions, Intravenous
Male
Middle Aged
Pain Measurement
Pain, Postoperative
/ drug therapy
Postoperative Complications
/ drug therapy
Treatment Failure
Journal
JAMA
ISSN: 1538-3598
Titre abrégé: JAMA
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7501160
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 07 2020
28 07 2020
Historique:
entrez:
29
7
2020
pubmed:
29
7
2020
medline:
13
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Opioid-induced ventilatory depression and hypoxemia is common, severe, and often unrecognized in postoperative patients. To the extent that nonopioid analgesics reduce opioid consumption, they may decrease postoperative hypoxemia. To test the hypothesis that duration of hypoxemia is less in patients given intravenous acetaminophen than those given placebo. Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial conducted at 2 US academic hospitals among 570 patients who were undergoing abdominal surgery, enrolled from February 2015 through October 2018 and followed up until February 2019. Participants were randomized to receive either intravenous acetaminophen, 1 g (n = 289), or normal saline placebo (n = 291) starting at the beginning of surgery and repeated every 6 hours until 48 postoperative hours or hospital discharge, whichever occurred first. The primary outcome was the total duration of hypoxemia (hemoglobin oxygen saturation [Spo2] <90%) per hour, with oxygen saturation measured continuously for 48 postoperative hours. Secondary outcomes were postoperative opioid consumption, pain (0- 10-point scale; 0: no pain; 10: the most pain imaginable), nausea and vomiting, sedation, minimal alveolar concentration of volatile anesthetic, fatigue, active time, and respiratory function. Among 580 patients randomized (mean age, 49 years; 48% women), 570 (98%) completed the trial. The primary outcome, median duration with Spo2 of less than 90%, was 0.7 (interquartile range [IQR], 0.1-5.1) minutes per hour among patients in the acetaminophen group and 1.1 (IQR, 0.1-6.6) minutes per hour among patients in the placebo group (P = .29), with an estimated median difference of -0.04 (95% CI,-0.18 to 0.11) minutes per hour. None of the 8 secondary end points differed significantly between the acetaminophen and placebo groups. Mean pain scores within initial 48 postoperative hours were 4.2 (SD, 1.8) in the acetaminophen group and 4.4 (SD, 1.8) in the placebo group (difference, -0.28; 95% CI, -0.71 to 0.15); median opioid use in morphine equivalents was 50 mg (IQR, 18-122 mg) and 58 mg (IQR, 24-151 mg) , respectively, with a ratio of geometric means of 0.86 (95% CI, 0.61-1.21). Among patients who underwent abdominal surgery, use of postoperative intravenous acetaminophen, compared with placebo, did not significantly reduce the duration of postoperative hypoxemia over 48 hours. The study findings do not support the use of intravenous acetaminophen for this purpose. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02156154.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32721009
pii: 2768808
doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.10009
pmc: PMC7388016
doi:
Substances chimiques
Analgesics, Non-Narcotic
0
Analgesics, Opioid
0
Acetaminophen
362O9ITL9D
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02156154']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
350-358Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Références
Am J Ther. 2000 Mar;7(2):143-7
pubmed: 11319582
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019 May;44(5):565-572
pubmed: 30867279
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1998 May;42(5):495-501
pubmed: 9605363
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Mar;218(3):353.e1-353.e4
pubmed: 29274831
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Apr;220(4):373.e1-373.e8
pubmed: 30682359
Clin J Pain. 2004 Sep-Oct;20(5):357-62
pubmed: 15322443
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Aug 1;143(8):788-794
pubmed: 28542675
Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 May;33(5):943-948
pubmed: 28276273
JAMA. 2019 Feb 19;321(7):686-696
pubmed: 30778597
Anesth Analg. 2018 Nov;127(5):1221-1228
pubmed: 29596101
Clin J Pain. 2013 Dec;29(12):1050-6
pubmed: 24189772
Anesthesiology. 2013 Jun;118(6):1332-40
pubmed: 23411725
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2019 Feb 11;4(2):250-254
pubmed: 31024996
J Clin Monit Comput. 2018 Oct;32(5):929-935
pubmed: 29260449
Med Care. 1996 Mar;34(3):220-33
pubmed: 8628042
Anesth Analg. 2013 Jul;117(1):91-100
pubmed: 23733842
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2018 Jun - Sep;32(2-3):82-89
pubmed: 30645153
Anesthesiology. 2018 Jul;129(1):77-88
pubmed: 29677001
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Apr;33(4):1052-1056
pubmed: 29174762
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Mar;133(3):492-502
pubmed: 30741813
Pain Pract. 2012 Sep;12(7):523-32
pubmed: 22524979
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Nov 15;166(10):1338-44
pubmed: 12421743
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Oct-Dec;34(4):465-471
pubmed: 30787509
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2017 Mar/Apr;23(2):80-85
pubmed: 28230615
Cureus. 2019 Jan 10;11(1):e3863
pubmed: 30899614
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2017 Feb;30(1):156-162
pubmed: 27685799