Differences and similarities between SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2: spike receptor-binding domain recognition and host cell infection with support of cellular serine proteases.


Journal

Infection
ISSN: 1439-0973
Titre abrégé: Infection
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 0365307

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2020
Historique:
received: 15 06 2020
accepted: 19 07 2020
pubmed: 2 8 2020
medline: 8 10 2020
entrez: 2 8 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) became pandemic by the end of March 2020. In contrast to the 2002-2003 SARS-CoV outbreak, which had a higher pathogenicity and lead to higher mortality rates, SARSCoV-2 infection appears to be much more contagious. Moreover, many SARS-CoV-2 infected patients are reported to develop low-titer neutralizing antibody and usually suffer prolonged illness, suggesting a more effective SARS-CoV-2 immune surveillance evasion than SARS-CoV. This paper summarizes the current state of art about the differences and similarities between the pathogenesis of the two coronaviruses, focusing on receptor binding domain, host cell entry and protease activation. Such differences may provide insight into possible intervention strategies to fight the pandemic.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32737833
doi: 10.1007/s15010-020-01486-5
pii: 10.1007/s15010-020-01486-5
pmc: PMC7393809
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antibodies, Viral 0
Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus 0
Cathepsins EC 3.4.-
Peptidyl-Dipeptidase A EC 3.4.15.1
ACE2 protein, human EC 3.4.17.23
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 EC 3.4.17.23
Serine Endopeptidases EC 3.4.21.-
TMPRSS2 protein, human EC 3.4.21.-

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

665-669

Références

Li Q, Guan X, Wu P, et al. Early transmission dynamics in Wuhan, China, of novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:1199–207.
pubmed: 31995857 pmcid: 31995857 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001316
Yang Y, Peng F, Wang R, et al. The deadly coronaviruses: the 2003 SARS pandemic and the 2020 novel coronavirus epidemic in China. J Autoimmun. 2020;109:102434.
pubmed: 32143990 pmcid: 7126544 doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2020.102434
Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020;395:1054–62.
pubmed: 32171076 pmcid: 7270627 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30566-3
Shang J, Wan Y, Luo C, et al. Cell entry mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2020;117:11727–34. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2003138117
pubmed: 32376634 doi: 10.1073/pnas.2003138117
Neuman BW, Adair BD, Yoshioka C, Quispe JD, Orca G, Kuhn P, et al. Supramolecular architecture of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus revealed by electron cryomicroscopy. J Virol. 2006;80:7918–28.
pubmed: 16873249 pmcid: 1563832 doi: 10.1128/JVI.00645-06
Goldsmith CS, Tatti KM, Ksiazek TG, et al. Ultrastructural characterization of SARS coronavirus. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004;10:320–6.
pubmed: 15030705 pmcid: 3322934 doi: 10.3201/eid1002.030913
Fehr AR, Perlman S. Coronaviruses: an overview of their replication and pathogenesis. In: Maier HJ, Bickerton E, Britton P, editors. Coronaviruses. Methods in molecular biology, vol 1282. Berlin: Springer; 2015. p. 1–23.
Heald-Sargent T, Gallagher T. Ready, set, fuse! The coronavirus spike protein and acquisition of fusion competence. Viruses. 2012;4:557–80.
pubmed: 22590686 pmcid: 3347323 doi: 10.3390/v4040557
Follis KE, York J, Nunberg JH. Furin cleavage of the SARS coronavirus spike glycoprotein enhances cell-cell fusion but does not affect virion entry. Virology. 2006;350:358–69.
pubmed: 16519916 pmcid: 7111780 doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2006.02.003
Simmons G, Zmora P, Gierer S, et al. Proteolytic activation of the SARS-coronavirus spike protein: cutting enzymes at the cutting edge of antiviral research. Antiviral Res. 2013;100:605–14.
pubmed: 24121034 pmcid: 3889862 doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2013.09.028
Lai MM, Cavanagh D. The molecular biology of coronaviruses. Adv Virus Res. 1997;48:1–100.
pubmed: 9233431 pmcid: 7130985 doi: 10.1016/S0065-3527(08)60286-9
Astuti I, Ysrafil Y. severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2): an overview of viral structure and host response. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2020;14:407–12.
pubmed: 32335367 pmcid: 7165108 doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.04.020
Neuman BW, Buchmeier MJ. Supramolecular architecture of the coronavirus particle. Adv Virus Res. 2016;96:1–27.
pubmed: 27712621 pmcid: 7112365 doi: 10.1016/bs.aivir.2016.08.005
Chen Y, Liu Q, Guo D. Emerging coronaviruses: genome structure, replication, and pathogenesis. J Med Virol. 2020;92:418–23.
pubmed: 31967327 pmcid: 7167049 doi: 10.1002/jmv.25681
Tortorici MA, Veesler D. Structural insights into coronavirus entry. Adv Virus Res. 2019;105:93–116.
pubmed: 31522710 pmcid: 7112261 doi: 10.1016/bs.aivir.2019.08.002
Wang LF, Shi Z, Zhang S, Field H, et al. Review of bats and SARS. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12:1834–40.
pubmed: 17326933 pmcid: 3291347 doi: 10.3201/eid1212.060401
Xu J, Zhao S, Teng T, et al. Systematic comparison of two animal-to-human transmitted human coronaviruses: SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV. Viruses. 2020;12:244.
pmcid: 7077191 doi: 10.3390/v12020244
Li W, Moore MJ, Vasilieva N, et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 is a functional receptor for the SARS coronavirus. Nature. 2003;426:450–4.
pubmed: 14647384 pmcid: 7095016 doi: 10.1038/nature02145
Yan R, Zhang Y, Li Y, Xia L, et al. Structural basis for the recognition of SARS-CoV-2 by full-length human ACE2. Science. 2020;367:1444–8.
pubmed: 32132184 pmcid: 7164635 doi: 10.1126/science.abb2762
Shang J, Ye G, Shi K, et al. Structural basis of receptor recognition by SARS-CoV-2. Nature. 2020;581:221–4.
pubmed: 32225175 doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2179-y
Yuan Y, Cao D, Zhang Y, et al. Cryo-EM structures of MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV spike glycoproteins reveal the dynamic receptor binding domains. Nat Commun. 2017;8:15092.
pubmed: 28393837 pmcid: 5394239 doi: 10.1038/ncomms15092
Letko M, Marzi A, Munster V. Functional assessment of cell entry and receptor usage for SARS-CoV-2 and other lineage B betacoronaviruses. Nat Microbiol. 2020;5:562–9.
pubmed: 32094589 doi: 10.1038/s41564-020-0688-y
Ou X, Liu Y, Lei X, et al. Characterization of spike glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 on virus entry and its immune cross-reactivity with SARS-CoV. Nat Commun. 2020;11:1620.
pubmed: 32221306 pmcid: 7100515 doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15562-9
Gui M, Song W, Zhou H, et al. Cryo-electron microscopy structures of the SARS-CoV spike glycoprotein reveal a prerequisite conformational state for receptor binding. Cell Res. 2017;27:119–29.
pubmed: 28008928 doi: 10.1038/cr.2016.152
Xia S, Liu M, Wang C, et al. Inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 (previously 2019-nCoV) infection by a highly potent pan-coronavirus fusion inhibitor targeting its spike protein that harbors a high capacity to mediate membrane fusion. Cell Res. 2020;30:343–55.
pubmed: 32231345 doi: 10.1038/s41422-020-0305-x
Gheblawi M, Wang K, Viveiros A, et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2: SARS-CoV-2 receptor and regulator of the renin-angiotensin system: celebrating the 20th anniversary of the discovery of ACE2. Circ Res. 2020;126:1456–74.
pubmed: 32264791 doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.120.317015
Ortiz-Fernandez L, Sawalha AH. Genetic variability in the expression of SARS-CoV-2 host cell entry factors across populations. bioRxiv. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.06.027698 .
doi: 10.1101/2020.04.06.027698
Belouzard S, Millet JK, Licitra BN, et al. Mechanisms of coronavirus cell entry mediated by the viral spike protein. Viruses. 2012;4:1011–33.
pubmed: 22816037 pmcid: 3397359 doi: 10.3390/v4061011
Rabaan AA, Al-Ahmed SH, Haque S, et al. SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV, and MERS-COV: a comparative overview. Infez Med. 2020;28:174–84.
pubmed: 32275259
Hasöksüz M, Kiliç S, Saraç F. Coronaviruses and SARS-COV-2. Turk J Med Sci. 2020;50:549–56.
pubmed: 32293832 pmcid: 7195990 doi: 10.3906/sag-2004-127
Liu J, Zheng X, Tong Q, et al. Overlapping and discrete aspects of the pathology and pathogenesis of the emerging human pathogenic coronaviruses SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and 2019-nCoV. J Med Virol. 2020;92:491–4.
pubmed: 32056249 pmcid: 7166760 doi: 10.1002/jmv.25709
Hoffmann M, Kleine-Weber H, et al. SARS-CoV-2 cell entry depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and is blocked by a clinically proven protease inhibitor. Cell. 2020;181:271–80.
pubmed: 32142651 pmcid: 32142651 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.052
Coutard B, Valle C, de Lamballerie X, et al. The spike glycoprotein of the new coronavirus 2019-nCoV contains a furin-like cleavage site absent in CoV of the same clade. Antiviral Res. 2020;176:104742.
pubmed: 32057769 pmcid: 7114094 doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2020.104742
Hoffmann M, Kleine-Weber H, Pöhlmann S. A multibasic cleavage site in the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 is essential for infection of human lung cells. Mol Cell. 2020;78(4):779–784.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2020.04.022 .
pubmed: 32362314 pmcid: 7194065 doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2020.04.022
Li F, Berardi M, Li W, et al. Conformational states of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus spike protein ectodomain. J Virol. 2006;80:6794–800.
pubmed: 16809285 pmcid: 1489032 doi: 10.1128/JVI.02744-05
Walls AC, Park YJ, Tortorici MA, et al. Structure, function, and antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein. Cell. 2020;181:281–92.
pubmed: 32155444 pmcid: 7102599 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.058
Liu C, Yang Y, Gao Y, et al. Viral architecture of SARS-CoV-2 with post-fusion spike revealed by Cryo-EM. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.02.972927 .
Millet JK, Whittaker GR. Host cell proteases: citical determinants of coronavirus tropism and pathogenesis. Virus Res. 2015;202:120–34.
pubmed: 25445340 doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2014.11.021
Kawase M, Shirato K, van der Hoek L, Taguchi F, Matsuyama S. Simultaneous treatment of human bronchial epithelial cells with serine and cysteine protease inhibitors prevents severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus entry. J Virol. 2012;86:6537–45.
pubmed: 22496216 pmcid: 3393535 doi: 10.1128/JVI.00094-12
McKee DL, Sternberg A, Stange U, Laufer S, Naujokat C. Candidate drugs against SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19. Pharmacol Res. 2020;157:104859.
pubmed: 32360480 pmcid: 7189851 doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2020.104859
McFadyen JD, Stevens H, Peter K. The emerging threat of (micro)thrombosis in COVID-19 and its therapeutic implications. Circ Res. 2020;10:1161 (published online ahead of print, 2020 Jun 26).

Auteurs

Giovanni A Rossi (GA)

Department of Pediatrics, G. Gaslini University Hospital, Genoa, Italy.

Oliviero Sacco (O)

Department of Pediatrics, G. Gaslini University Hospital, Genoa, Italy.

Enrica Mancino (E)

Department of Maternal Science, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Luca Cristiani (L)

Department of Maternal Science, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Fabio Midulla (F)

Department of Maternal Science, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy. midulla@uniroma1.it.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH