Sacubitril/valsartan use in a real-world population of patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction.
Aged
Aminobutyrates
/ adverse effects
Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers
/ adverse effects
Biphenyl Compounds
/ adverse effects
Clinical Decision-Making
Disease Progression
Drug Combinations
Female
Heart Failure
/ diagnosis
Heart Transplantation
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Neprilysin
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Protease Inhibitors
/ adverse effects
Recovery of Function
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Stroke Volume
/ drug effects
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Valsartan
/ adverse effects
Ventricular Function, Left
/ drug effects
Journal
Journal of cardiovascular medicine (Hagerstown, Md.)
ISSN: 1558-2035
Titre abrégé: J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101259752
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2020
Nov 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
3
8
2020
medline:
8
6
2021
entrez:
3
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Practice guidelines recommend sacubitril/valsartan for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. The aim of our study was to describe the use of sacubitril/valsartan in real-world clinical practice to help identify patients best able to tolerate titration to higher doses. We retrospectively analyzed clinical data for 201 patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction prescribed sacubitril/valsartan at our heart failure clinic (Centro Cardiologico Monzino) between September 2016/December 2018. Patients had a mean age of 67.2 years, mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 30.1%, New York Heart Association class II (65%), class III (35%), and poor cardiopulmonary exercise capacity. Median 2-year risk of death/urgent cardiac transplantation was 8.9% [Metabolic Exercise Cardiac Kidney Index (MECKI) score]. After a median follow-up of 230 (interquartile interval: 105-366) days, 57 patients achieved higher-dose sacubitril/valsartan, 103 tolerated medium/low doses, nine died, and 20 interrupted treatment. The highest dose of sacubitril/valsartan was reached by younger patients with better hemoglobin (Hb) levels, renal function, and blood pressure (BP). Patients continuing on sacubitril/valsartan had significantly higher serum Hb and sodium, better BP, and lower MECKI scores than patients who discontinued treatment or died during follow-up. Our patients were older and frailer than those in the pivotal PARADIGM-HF trial. In our experience, more than one-third of the patients were able to tolerate the higher dose of sacubitril/valsartan, and these patients were younger, had higher Hb, and better BP and renal function. MECKI score stratification was useful to discriminate patients who continued treatment from those who did not. Future prospective studies should test if these clinical variables can guide the up-titration of sacubitril/valsartan.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32740412
doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000001018
pii: 01244665-202011000-00007
doi:
Substances chimiques
Aminobutyrates
0
Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers
0
Biphenyl Compounds
0
Drug Combinations
0
Protease Inhibitors
0
Valsartan
80M03YXJ7I
Neprilysin
EC 3.4.24.11
sacubitril and valsartan sodium hydrate drug combination
WB8FT61183
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
882-888Références
Gu J, Noe A, Chandra P, et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of LCZ696, a novel dual-acting angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNi). J Clin Pharmacol 2010; 50:401–414.
Ruilope LM, Dukat A, Bohm M, Lacourciere Y, Gong J, Lefkowitz MP. Blood-pressure reduction with LCZ696, a novel dual-acting inhibitor of the angiotensin II receptor and neprilysin: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, active comparator study. Lancet 2010; 375:1255–1266.
McMurray JJ, Packer M, Desai AS, et al. Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition versus enalapril in heart failure. N Eng J Med 2014; 371:993–1004.
Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, et al. 2016 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: the Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J 2016; 37:2129–2200.
Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, et al. 2016 ACC/AHA/HFSA focused update on new pharmacological therapy for heart failure: an update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Failure Society of America. Circulation 2016; 134:e282–e293.
Velazquez EJ, Morrow DA, DeVore AD, et al. Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition in acute decompensated heart failure. N Eng J Med 2019; 380:539–548.
Martens P, Belien H, Dupont M, Mullens W. Insights into implementation of sacubitril/valsartan into clinical practice. ESC Heart Fail 2018; 5:275–283.
Lau CW, Martens P, Lambeets S, Dupont M, Mullens W. Effects of sacubitril/valsartan on functional status and exercise capacity in real-world patients. Acta Cardiol 2019; 74:405–412.
Wachter R, Viriato D, Klebs S, et al. Early insights into the characteristics and evolution of clinical parameters in a cohort of patients prescribed sacubitril/valsartan in Germany. Postgrad Med 2018; 130:308–316.
Martens P, Lambeets S, Lau CW, Dupont M, Mullens W. Impact of sacubitril/valsartan on heart failure admissions: insights from real-world patient prescriptions. Acta Cardiol 2019; 74:115–122.
Januzzi JL Jr, Prescott MF, Butler J, et al. Association of change in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide following initiation of sacubitril-valsartan treatment with cardiac structure and function in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. JAMA 2019; 322:1–11.
Vitale G, Romano G, Di Franco A, et al. Early effects of sacubitril/valsartan on exercise tolerance in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. J Clin Med 2019; 8:E262.
Agostoni P, Corra U, Cattadori G, et al. Metabolic exercise test data combined with cardiac and kidney indexes, the MECKI score: a multiparametric approach to heart failure prognosis. Int J Cardiol 2013; 167:2710–2718.
Agostoni P, Paolillo S, Mapelli M, et al. Multiparametric prognostic scores in chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a long-term comparison. Eur J Heart Fail 2018; 20:700–710.
Corra U, Agostoni P, Giordano A, et al. The metabolic exercise test data combined with Cardiac And Kidney Indexes (MECKI) score and prognosis in heart failure. A validation study. Int J Cardiol 2016; 203:1067–1072.
Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, et al. A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Inter Med 2009; 150:604–612.
Hillege HL, Nitsch D, Pfeffer MA, et al. Renal function as a predictor of outcome in a broad spectrum of patients with heart failure. Circulation 2006; 113:671–678.
Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2015; 28:1–39.e14.
Agostoni P, Bianchi M, Moraschi A, et al. Work-rate affects cardiopulmonary exercise test results in heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail 2005; 7:498–504.
Corra U, Pistono M, Mezzani A, et al. Sleep and exertional periodic breathing in chronic heart failure: prognostic importance and interdependence. Circulation 2006; 113:44–50.
Wasserman K, Hansen JE, Sue DY, Stringer WW, Whipp BJ. Clinical exercise testing. principles of exercise testing and interpretation including pathophysiology and clinical applications. 2005; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 138–139.
Esteban-Fernandez A, Diez-Villanueva P, Vicent L, et al. Sacubitril/Valsartan is useful and safe in elderly people with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. Data from a real-word cohort. Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol 2019; 55:65–69.
Vicent L, Esteban-Fernandez A, Gomez-Bueno M, et al. Clinical profile of a nonselected population treated with sacubitril/valsartan is different from PARADIGM-HF trial. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 2018; 72:112–116.
Maggioni AP, Anker SD, Dahlstrom U, et al. Are hospitalized or ambulatory patients with heart failure treated in accordance with European Society of Cardiology guidelines? Evidence from 12,440 patients of the ESC Heart Failure Long-Term Registry. Eur J Heart Fail 2013; 15:1173–1184.
Ouwerkerk W, Voors AA, Anker SD, et al. Determinants and clinical outcome of uptitration of ACE-inhibitors and beta-blockers in patients with heart failure: a prospective European study. Eur Heart J 2017; 38:1883–1890.
Senni M, McMurray JJ, Wachter R, et al. Initiating sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696) in heart failure: results of TITRATION, a double-blind, randomized comparison of two uptitration regimens. Eur J Heart Fail 2016; 18:1193–1202.
Vardeny O, Claggett B, Packer M, et al. Efficacy of sacubitril/valsartan vs. enalapril at lower than target doses in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: the PARADIGM-HF trial. Eur J Heart Fail 2016; 18:1228–1234.