The French Cochlear Implant Registry (EPIIC): Cochlear implant candidacy assessment of off-label indications.
Adolescent
Adult
Age Factors
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Audiometry, Speech
/ methods
Auditory Brain Stem Implantation
/ statistics & numerical data
Child
Child, Preschool
Cochlear Implantation
/ adverse effects
Cochlear Implants
/ adverse effects
Female
France
/ epidemiology
Health Surveys
Hearing Loss
/ rehabilitation
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Off-Label Use
/ statistics & numerical data
Patient Selection
Postoperative Complications
/ epidemiology
Postoperative Period
Preoperative Care
Prospective Studies
Quality of Life
Registries
/ statistics & numerical data
Young Adult
CI
Hearing in noise
Indications
Off-label indication
Outside the selection criteria
Partial deafness
Revision
Sensorineural deafness
Single-sided deafness
Speech audiometry
Journal
European annals of otorhinolaryngology, head and neck diseases
ISSN: 1879-730X
Titre abrégé: Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis
Pays: France
ID NLM: 101531465
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2020
Sep 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
9
8
2020
medline:
9
9
2021
entrez:
9
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Evaluate in France the outcomes of cochlear implantation outside the selection criteria, off-label. This is a prospective cohort study including adults and children having received a cochlear implant (CI) in an off-label indication, that is outside the criteria established by the "Haute Autorité de santé (HAS)" in 2012. The data was collected from the "EPIIC" registry on recipients who received CIs in France between 2011 and 2014. Speech audiometry was performed at 60dB preimplantation and after one year of CI use, as well as an evaluation of the scores of the quality of life with the APHAB questionnaire, the scores for CAP and the professional/academic status in pre- and post-implantation conditions. Major and minor complications at surgery have been recorded. In total, 590 patients (447 adults and 143 children) with an off-label indication for CIs were included in this study from the EPIIC registry (11.7% of the whole cohort of EPIIC). For adults, the median percentage of comprehension using monosyllabic word lists was 41% in preimplantation condition versus 53% after one year of CI use (P<0.001) and 60% versus 71% in dissyllabic word lists (P<0.001). The CAP scores were 5 versus 6 in pre- and post-implantation conditions respectively (P<0.001) and the APHAB scores were statistically lower after implantation (P<0.001). In the children cohort, the median percentage of comprehension using monosyllabic word lists was 51% in preimplantation condition and 65% after CI (P<0.001), and 48% versus 82% (P<0.001) for dissyllabic word lists. The CAP scores were 5 versus 7 respectively in pre- and post-CI conditions (P<0.001). Thirty-two minor complications (5.4%) and 17 major complications (2.8%) were reported in our panel of off-label indication patients. These results suggest that a revision of the cochlear implantation candidacy criteria is necessary to allow more patients with severe or asymmetric hearing loss to benefit from a CI when there is an impact on quality of life despite the use of an optimal hearing aid.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32763084
pii: S1879-7296(20)30178-2
doi: 10.1016/j.anorl.2020.07.012
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
S27-S35Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.