Robot-assisted kidney transplantation: update from the European Robotic Urology Section (ERUS) series.
Europe
/ epidemiology
Female
Humans
Incidence
Kidney Failure, Chronic
/ surgery
Kidney Transplantation
/ methods
Living Donors
/ supply & distribution
Male
Middle Aged
Operative Time
Postoperative Complications
/ epidemiology
Prospective Studies
Registries
Robotic Surgical Procedures
/ methods
Societies, Medical
Survival Rate
/ trends
Treatment Outcome
Urology
#KidneyTransplant
kidney transplantation
living donor
minimal invasive surgery
robot-assisted kidney transplantation
robotics
Journal
BJU international
ISSN: 1464-410X
Titre abrégé: BJU Int
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100886721
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2021
02 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
10
8
2020
medline:
27
4
2021
entrez:
10
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To report the results of the robot-assisted kidney transplantation (RAKT) experience performed in 10 European centres by members of the European Robotic Urology Section (ERUS)-RAKT group. This is a multicentre prospective observational study of RAKT. Descriptive analysis of recipients and donor characteristics, surgical data, intraoperative outcomes, complications rate and functional results were collected and analysed. Between July 2015 and September 2019, 291 living-donor RAKTs were performed. Recipients were mostly male (189 [65%]), the mean Standard deviation (sd) age was 45.2 (13.35) years, the mean (sd) body mass index was 27.13 (19.28) kg/m This is the largest European multicentre study of RAKT with good surgical and functional results competitive with open kidney transplant series, with a relatively short learning curve when performed in centres with a wide experience in open kidney transplantation and robotic surgery.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
222-228Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors BJU International © 2020 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Wagenaar S, Nederhoed JH, Hoksbergen AWJ, Bonjer HJ, Wisselink W, van Ramshorst GH. Minimally invasive, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted techniques versus open techniques for kidney transplant recipients: a systematic review. Eur Urol 2017; 72: 205-17
Hoznek A, Zaki SK, Samadi DB et al. Robotic assisted kidney transplantation: an initial experience. J Urol 2002; 167: 1604-6
Giulianotti P, Gorodner V, Sbrana F et al. Robotic transabdominal kidney transplantation in a morbidly obese patient. Am J Transplant 2010; 10: 1478-82
Boggi U, Vistoli F, Signori S et al. Robotic renal transplantation: first European case. Transpl Int 2011; 24: 213-8
Menon M, Abaza R, Sood A et al. Robotic kidney transplantation with regional hypothermia: evolution of a novel procedure utilizing the IDEAL guidelines (IDEAL phase 0 and 1). Eur Urol 2014; 65: 1001-9
Menon M, Sood A, Bhandari M et al. Robotic kidney transplantation with regional hypothermia: a step-by-step description of the Vattikuti Urology Institute-Medanta technique (IDEAL phase 2a). Eur Urol 2014; 65: 991-1000
Oberholzer J, Giulianotti P, Danielson KK et al. Minimally invasive robotic kidney transplantation for obese patients previously denied access to transplantation. Am J Transplant 2013; 13: 721-8
Breda A, Gausa L, Territo A et al. Robotic-assisted kidney transplantation: our first case. World J Urol 2016; 34: 443-7
Doumerc N, Roumiguie M, Beauval J et al. Transplantation rénale robotique “sans incision”: insertion du rein par voie vaginale avec reconstruction vaginale endocorporelle. Prog Urol 2015; 25: 866-7
Alcaraz A, Peri L, Vilaseca A, Izquierdo L, Mateu L, Musquera M. Robotic kidney transplantation with transvaginal graft insertion. Eur Urol Suppl 2016; 15: eV54
Tsai MK, Lee CY, Yang CY, Yeh CC, Hu RH, Lai HS. Robot-assisted renal transplantation in the retroperitoneum. Transpl Int 2014; 27: 452-7
Breda A, Territo A, Gausa L et al. Robot-assisted kidney transplantation: the European experience. Eur Urol 2018; 73: 273-81
Collins AJ, Foley RN, Gilbertson DT, Chen S-C. United States Renal Data System public health surveillance of chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease. Kidney Int Suppl 2015; 5: 2-7
Territo A, Gausa L, Alcaraz A et al. European experience of robot-assisted kidney transplantation: minimum of 1-year follow-up. BJU Int 2018; 122: 255-62
Siena G, Campi R, Decaestecker K et al. Robot-assisted Kidney transplantation with regional hypothermia using grafts with multiple vessels after extracorporeal vascular reconstruction: results from the European Association of Urology Robotic Urology Section Working Group. Eur Urol Focus 2018; 4: 175-84
Mandal AK, Cohen C, Montgomery RA et al. Should the indications for laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy of the right kidney be the same for the open procedures? Anomalous left renal vasculature is not a contraindication to laparoscopic left donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 2001; 71: 660
Nanidis TG, Antcliffe D, Kokkinos C et al. Laparoscopic versus open live donor nephrectomy in renal transplantation: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2008; 247: 58
Troppmann C, Perez RV, McBride M. Similar long term outcomes for laparoscopic versus open live donor nephrectomy kidney grafts: an OPTN database analysis of 5532 adult recipients. Transplantation 2008; 85: 916
Ciudin A, Musquera M, Huguet J et al. Transposition of ilíac vessels in implantation of right living donor kidneys. Transplantat Proc 2012; 44: 2945-8
Michiels C, Rouffilange J, Comat V et al.Total preperitoneal robot-assisted kidney transplantation. J Endourol Case Rep 2017; 3: 169-72
Bruyère F, Pradère B, Faivre d'Arcier B, Boutin JM, Buchler M, Brichart N. Robot-assisted renal transplantation using the retroperitoneal approach (RART) with more than one year follow up: description of the technique and results. Prog Urol 2018; 28: 48-54
Demyttenaere S, Feldman LS, Fried GM. Effect of pneumoperitoneum on renal perfusion and function: a systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2007; 21: 152-60
Redfield RR, Scalea JR, Zens TJ et al. Predictors and outcomes of delayed graft function after living-donor kidney transplantation. Transpl Int 2016; 29: 81-7
Kukreja JB, Metcalfe MJ, Qiao W, Kamat AM, Dinney CP, Navai N. Cost-effectiveness of robot-assisted radical cystectomy using a propensity-matched cohort. Eur Urol Focus 2020; 6: 88-94