Factors Important in the Selection of a Rhinology/Skull Base Surgery Fellow: A National Survey of Fellowship Directors.

American Rhinologic Society allergy endoscopic skull base surgery fellowship fellowship directors otolaryngology fellowship rhinology selection criteria selection factors survey

Journal

American journal of rhinology & allergy
ISSN: 1945-8932
Titre abrégé: Am J Rhinol Allergy
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101490775

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Mar 2021
Historique:
pubmed: 12 8 2020
medline: 19 8 2021
entrez: 12 8 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The numbers of Rhinology/Skull Base Surgery fellowship programs and applicants have been increasing in recent years. However, little information is currently available with regards to the most important aspects of the application process. The goal of this study was to determine the factors that Rhinology/Skull Base Surgery fellowship directors consider most important when selecting a fellow. An anonymous, online survey was distributed to current Rhinology/Skull Base Surgery fellowship directors. 28 of 31 fellowship directors (90%) completed the survey. Respondents were asked to provide basic information regarding the program and to rank various selection factors they deem most important. For assessing the quality of an application, fellowship directors placed the highest value on LORs. Research experience and publications were also important considerations. The traditional strength of an applicant's residency program was a factor, while medical school performance, USMLE scores, and OTE score did not play a significant role in the selection process. For subjective assessment of applicants, the most value was placed on faculty assessment of the applicant during their interview. Attention was also given to personality fit with the program and the perceived maturity and initiative of the applicant. Numerous academic achievements and personal characteristics are given consideration in the Rhinology/Skull Base Surgery fellowship selection process, but recommendation from a trusted colleague and performance on interviews were viewed to be the most critical factors for fellowship programs in selecting applicants. This is consistent with studies that have explored the selection process for other otolaryngology fellowship programs.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The numbers of Rhinology/Skull Base Surgery fellowship programs and applicants have been increasing in recent years. However, little information is currently available with regards to the most important aspects of the application process.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
The goal of this study was to determine the factors that Rhinology/Skull Base Surgery fellowship directors consider most important when selecting a fellow.
METHODS METHODS
An anonymous, online survey was distributed to current Rhinology/Skull Base Surgery fellowship directors. 28 of 31 fellowship directors (90%) completed the survey. Respondents were asked to provide basic information regarding the program and to rank various selection factors they deem most important.
RESULTS RESULTS
For assessing the quality of an application, fellowship directors placed the highest value on LORs. Research experience and publications were also important considerations. The traditional strength of an applicant's residency program was a factor, while medical school performance, USMLE scores, and OTE score did not play a significant role in the selection process. For subjective assessment of applicants, the most value was placed on faculty assessment of the applicant during their interview. Attention was also given to personality fit with the program and the perceived maturity and initiative of the applicant.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Numerous academic achievements and personal characteristics are given consideration in the Rhinology/Skull Base Surgery fellowship selection process, but recommendation from a trusted colleague and performance on interviews were viewed to be the most critical factors for fellowship programs in selecting applicants. This is consistent with studies that have explored the selection process for other otolaryngology fellowship programs.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32777928
doi: 10.1177/1945892420948778
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

234-238

Auteurs

Jared Johnson (J)

Department of Otolaryngology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.

James Stathakios (J)

Department of Otolaryngology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.

Michael T Chung (MT)

Department of Otolaryngology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.

Ricardo Engel (R)

Department of Otolaryngology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.

Adam Folbe (A)

Department of Otolaryngology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
Department of Otolaryngology, Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH