Factors that promote successful endoscopic management of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy leaks.


Journal

Surgical endoscopy
ISSN: 1432-2218
Titre abrégé: Surg Endosc
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8806653

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 2021
Historique:
received: 06 04 2020
accepted: 05 08 2020
pubmed: 12 8 2020
medline: 21 10 2021
entrez: 12 8 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Staple line leaks following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Endoluminal techniques, including stent placement and endoluminal vacuum therapy (EVAC), have become viable options to treat these patients without the need for additional surgery. The purpose of this study was to define the conditions where certain endoscopic therapies are most likely to succeed compared to surgery. An IRB approved prospectively maintained database was retrospectively reviewed for all patients treated for gastrointestinal leaks from July 2013 to March 2019. All patients who were treated for gastrointestinal leaks following LSG were included. Endpoints include success of leak closure and hospital-related morbidity for the patients treated solely by endoscopic only methods (EP) compared to the additional surgery group (SP). There were 39 patients (33 females; 6 males) with a median age of 45.9 years. The EP group included 23 patients (59%), whereas SP included 16 patients (31%). On average, the SP had longer days from sentinel surgery to our hospital admission (70 vs 41), a higher percentage of previous bariatric surgery prior to sentinel LSG (50% vs 17%), and a higher readmission rates following discharge (50% vs 39%). Total length of stay was also higher in the SP compared to the EP (45.4 vs 11). Using this data, a treatment algorithm was developed to optimally treat future patients who suffer from gastrointestinal leaks following LSG. Endoscopic therapies, such as EVAC, stent placement, internal drainage, and over-the-scope clips, have a higher chance of success if performed earlier to their sentinel surgery and if patients have had no prior bariatric surgeries. Patients who require additional surgery tend to have longer hospital stays and readmission rates. Using the treatment algorithm provided can help determine when endoscopic therapies are likely to succeed.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32780233
doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07890-0
pii: 10.1007/s00464-020-07890-0
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

4638-4643

Références

Golzarand M, Toolabi K, Farid R (2017) The bariatric surgery and weight losing: a meta-analysis in the long- and very long-term effects of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding, laparoscopic Roux en-Y gastric bypass and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy on weight loss in adults. Surg Endosc 31(11):4331–4345
doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5505-1
Khorgami Z, Shoar S, Andalib A et al (2017) Trends in utilization of bariatric surgery, 2010–2014: sleeve gastrectomy dominates. Surg Obes Relat Dis 13(5):774–778
doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2017.01.031
Shi X, Karmali S, Sharma A (2010) A review of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity. Obes Surg 20:1171–1177
doi: 10.1007/s11695-010-0145-8
Colquitt JL, Pickett K, Loveman E et al (2014) Surgery for weight loss in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 8:CD003641
Diamantis T, Konstantinos K, Apostolou G et al (2014) Review of long-term weight loss results after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis 10(1):177–183
doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2013.11.007
Clapp B, Wynn M, Martyn C et al (2018) Long term (7 or more years) outcomes of the sleeve gastrectomy: a meta-analysis. Surg Obes Relat Dis 14(6):741–747
doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2018.02.027
Genco A, Soricelli E, Casella G et al (2017) Gastroesophageal reflux disease and Barrett's esophagus after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a possible, underestimated long-term complication. Surg Obes Relat Dis 13(4):568–574
doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2016.11.029
Gagner M, Hutchinson C, Rosenthal R (2016) Fifth international consensus conference: current status of sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis 12(4):750–756
doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2016.01.022
Knapps J, Ghanem M, Clements J, Merchant AM (2013) A systematic review of staple-line reinforcement in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. JSLS 17(3):390–399
doi: 10.4293/108680813X13654754534639
Al Hajj G, Chemaly R (2018) Fistula following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a proposed classification and algorithm for optimal management. Obes Surg 28(3):656–664
doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2905-1
Alazmi W, Al-Sabah S, AlMohammad Ali D, Almazeedi S (2014) Treating sleeve gastrectomy leak with endoscopic stenting: the Kuwaiti experience and review of recent literature. Surg Endosc 28(12):3425–3428
doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3616-5
Leeds SG, Burdick JS (2016) Management of gastric leaks after sleeve gastrectomy with endoluminal vacuum (E-Vac) therapy. Surg Obes Relat Dis 12(7):1278–1285
doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2016.01.017
Mahadev S, Kumbhari V, Campos JM et al (2017) Endoscopic septotomy: an effective approach for internal drainage of sleeve gastrectomy-associated collections. Endoscopy 49(5):504–508
doi: 10.1055/s-0042-122012
Nedelcu M, Manos T, Cotirlet A et al (2015) Outcome of leaks after sleeve gastrectomy based on a new algorithm adressing leak size and gastric stenosis. Obes Surg 25(3):559–563
doi: 10.1007/s11695-014-1561-y
Nimeri A, Ibrahim M, Maasher A, Al HM (2016) Management algorithm for leaks following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg 26(1):21–25
doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1751-2
Mencio MA, Ontiveros E, Burdick JS, Leeds SG (2018) Use of a novel technique to manage gastrointestinal leaks with endoluminal negative pressure: a single institution experience. Surg Endosc 32(7):3349–3356
doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6055-x
Morell B, Murray F, Vetter D et al (2019) Endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) for early infradiaphragmal leakage after bariatric surgery-outcomes of six consecutive cases in a single institution. Langenbecks Arch Surg 404(1):115–121
doi: 10.1007/s00423-019-01750-9
Ward MA, Hassan T, Burdick JS, Leeds SG (2019) Endoscopic vacuum assisted wound closure (EVAC) device to treat esophageal and gastric leaks: assessing time to proficiency and cost. Surg Endosc 33(12):3970–3975
doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06685-2
Leeds SG, Mencio M, Ontiveros E, Ward MA (2019) Endoluminal vacuum therapy: how I do it. J Gastrointest Surg 23(5):1037–1043
doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-04082-z
Gagniere J, Slim K, Launay-Savary MV, Raspado O, Flamein R, Chipponi J (2011) Previous gastric banding increases morbidity and gastric leaks after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for obesity. Journal of visceral surgery 148(3):e205–e209
doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2011.05.004
Acholonu E, McBean E, Bellorin O, Szomstein S, Rosenthal RJ (2009) Safety and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a revisional approach for failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in the treatment of morbid obesity. Obes Surg 19(12):1612–1616
doi: 10.1007/s11695-009-9941-4
Rosenthal RJ, International Sleeve Gastrectomy Expert Panel, Aceves Diaz A et al (2014) International sleeve gastrectomy expert panel consensus statement: best practice guidelines based on experience of >12,000 cases. Surg Obes Relat Dis 8(1):8–19
doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2011.10.019
Sasson M, Ahman H, Dip F, Menzo EL, Szomstein S, Rosenthal RJ (2016) Comparison between major and minor surgical procedures for the treatment of chronic staple line disruption after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis 12(5):969–975
doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2016.03.024

Auteurs

Marc A Ward (MA)

Center for Advanced Surgery, Baylor Scott and White Health, Dallas, TX, USA. Marc.Ward@bswhealth.org.
Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA. Marc.Ward@bswhealth.org.
Texas A&M College of Medicine, Bryan, TX, USA. Marc.Ward@bswhealth.org.
Center for Advanced Surgery, Baylor Scott and White Health, 3417 Gaston Avenue, Suite 1000 East, Dallas, TX, 75246, USA. Marc.Ward@bswhealth.org.

Ahmed Ebrahim (A)

Texas A&M College of Medicine, Bryan, TX, USA.

Jessica S Clothier (JS)

Texas A&M College of Medicine, Bryan, TX, USA.

Purvi K Prajapati (PK)

Research Institute, Baylor Scott and White Health, Dallas, TX, USA.

Gerald O Ogola (GO)

Research Institute, Baylor Scott and White Health, Dallas, TX, USA.

Daniel G Davis (DG)

Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Texas A&M College of Medicine, Bryan, TX, USA.
Center for Metabolic and Weight Loss Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.

Steven G Leeds (SG)

Center for Advanced Surgery, Baylor Scott and White Health, Dallas, TX, USA.
Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Texas A&M College of Medicine, Bryan, TX, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH