HEARTBREAK Controls Post-translational Modification of INDEHISCENT to Regulate Fruit Morphology in Capsella.
Adaptation, Physiological
/ genetics
Anisotropy
Arabidopsis Proteins
Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors
/ metabolism
Capsella
/ genetics
Fruit
/ genetics
Gene Expression
/ genetics
Gene Expression Regulation, Plant
/ genetics
Plant Proteins
/ metabolism
Protein Processing, Post-Translational
/ genetics
Ubiquitins
/ genetics
Capsella rubella
SUMOylation
anisotropic cell growth
fruit morphology
gene expression
post-translational modification
Journal
Current biology : CB
ISSN: 1879-0445
Titre abrégé: Curr Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9107782
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 10 2020
05 10 2020
Historique:
received:
14
06
2020
revised:
13
07
2020
accepted:
16
07
2020
pubmed:
17
8
2020
medline:
11
8
2021
entrez:
16
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Morphological variation is the basis of natural diversity and adaptation. For example, angiosperms (flowering plants) evolved during the Cretaceous period more than 100 mya and quickly colonized terrestrial habitats [1]. A major reason for their astonishing success was the formation of fruits, which exist in a myriad of different shapes and sizes [2]. Evolution of organ shape is fueled by variation in expression patterns of regulatory genes causing changes in anisotropic cell expansion and division patterns [3-5]. However, the molecular mechanisms that alter the polarity of growth to generate novel shapes are largely unknown. The heart-shaped fruits produced by members of the Capsella genus comprise an anatomical novelty, making it particularly well suited for studies on morphological diversification [6-8]. Here, we show that post-translational modification of regulatory proteins provides a critical step in organ-shape formation. Our data reveal that the SUMO protease, HEARTBREAK (HTB), from Capsella rubella controls the activity of the key regulator of fruit development, INDEHISCENT (CrIND in C. rubella), via de-SUMOylation. This post-translational modification initiates a transduction pathway required to ensure precisely localized auxin biosynthesis, thereby facilitating anisotropic cell expansion to ultimately form the heart-shaped Capsella fruit. Therefore, although variation in the expression of key regulatory genes is known to be a primary driver in morphological evolution, our work demonstrates how other processes-such as post-translational modification of one such regulator-affects organ morphology.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32795439
pii: S0960-9822(20)31080-0
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.07.055
pmc: PMC7544509
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Arabidopsis Proteins
0
Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors
0
INDEHISCENT protein, Arabidopsis
0
Plant Proteins
0
SUMO protein, plant
0
Ubiquitins
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3880-3888.e5Subventions
Organisme : Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
ID : BB/P020747/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
ID : BB/P013511/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Interests The authors declare no competing interests.
Références
Curr Biol. 2017 Sep 11;27(17):R941-R951
pubmed: 28898667
Nature. 1991 Jun 20;351(6328):652-4
pubmed: 1904993
Curr Biol. 2020 Apr 20;30(8):1410-1423.e3
pubmed: 32109396
Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol. 2004 Nov;281(1):1123-37
pubmed: 15470672
J Exp Bot. 2018 Aug 31;69(19):4633-4649
pubmed: 30053161
Trends Biochem Sci. 1998 Oct;23(10):403-5
pubmed: 9810230
Curr Biol. 2014 Nov 17;24(22):2743-8
pubmed: 25455035
Biol Open. 2019 Oct 18;8(10):
pubmed: 31628142
Elife. 2015 May 06;4:05864
pubmed: 25946108
Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2005 Oct;15(5):536-41
pubmed: 16095902
PLoS Biol. 2005 Jul;3(7):e245
pubmed: 16000021
Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2013;64:219-41
pubmed: 23394500
Nat Genet. 2013 Jul;45(7):831-5
pubmed: 23749190
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Mar 31;106(13):5246-51
pubmed: 19307580
Nat Protoc. 2009;4(1):44-57
pubmed: 19131956
Nat Rev Genet. 2007 Mar;8(3):206-16
pubmed: 17304246
Genome Biol. 2014;15(12):550
pubmed: 25516281
Nat Biotechnol. 2016 May;34(5):525-7
pubmed: 27043002
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Dec 10;116(50):25333-25342
pubmed: 31757847
Trends Cell Biol. 2010 Apr;20(4):223-32
pubmed: 20189809
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Nov 29;113(48):13911-13916
pubmed: 27849572
Nat Protoc. 2007;2(7):1565-72
pubmed: 17585298
Plant Reprod. 2016 Jun;29(1-2):149-63
pubmed: 27016361
Nature. 2009 May 28;459(7246):583-6
pubmed: 19478783
Plant Physiol. 2017 Dec;175(4):1703-1719
pubmed: 29066667
Mol Biol Evol. 2011 Oct;28(10):2731-9
pubmed: 21546353
Science. 2018 Dec 21;362(6421):1407-1410
pubmed: 30573626
Mol Biol Evol. 2011 Jan;28(1):63-70
pubmed: 20837603
Transcription. 2017 Aug 8;8(4):220-231
pubmed: 28379052
Development. 2016 Sep 15;143(18):3394-406
pubmed: 27624834
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jan 31;114(5):1087-1092
pubmed: 28096395
Cell. 2000 Jun 9;101(6):577-80
pubmed: 10892643
Plant J. 2012 Nov;72(3):523-36
pubmed: 22725617
Trends Biochem Sci. 2007 Jun;32(6):286-95
pubmed: 17499995
Mol Plant. 2017 Mar 6;10(3):530-532
pubmed: 28089950
Plant Cell. 2018 May;30(5):1077-1099
pubmed: 29588388
Elife. 2016 Sep 06;5:
pubmed: 27596932
J Integr Plant Biol. 2017 Jan;59(1):15-29
pubmed: 27925396
J Exp Bot. 2016 Apr;67(9):2541-8
pubmed: 27012284
Curr Biol. 2019 Mar 18;29(6):1038-1046.e4
pubmed: 30827915
New Phytol. 2017 Oct;216(2):401-418
pubmed: 28248421