The importance of aromaticity to describe the interactions of organic matter with carbonaceous materials depends on molecular weight and sorbent geometry.


Journal

Environmental science. Processes & impacts
ISSN: 2050-7895
Titre abrégé: Environ Sci Process Impacts
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101601576

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
23 Sep 2020
Historique:
pubmed: 18 8 2020
medline: 6 11 2020
entrez: 18 8 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Dissolved organic matter (DOM) is ubiquitous in aquatic environments where it interacts with a variety of particles including carbonaceous materials (CMs). The complexity of both DOM and the CMs makes DOM-CM interactions difficult to predict. In this study we have identified the preferential sorption of specific DOM fractions as being dependent on their aromaticity and molecular weight, as well as on the surface properties of the CMs. This was achieved by conducting sorption batch experiments with three types of DOM (humic acid, Suwannee River natural organic matter, and a compost extract) and three types of CMs (graphite, carbon nanotubes, and biochar) with different geometries and surface complexities. The non-adsorbed DOM fraction was analyzed by size exclusion chromatography and preferentially sorbed molecular weight fractions were analyzed by UV/vis and fluorescence spectroscopy. All three sorbent types were found to preferentially sorb aromatic DOM fractions, but DOM fractionation depended on the particular combination of sorbent and sorbate characteristics. Single-walled carbon nanotubes only sorbed the smaller molecular weight fractions (<1 kDa). The sorption of smaller DOM fractions was not accompanied by a preference for less aromatic compounds, contrary to what was suggested in previous studies. While graphite preferentially sorbed the most aromatic DOM fraction (1-3 kDa), the structural heterogeneity of biochar resulted in reduced selectivity, sorbing all DOM > 1 kDa. The results explain the lack of correlation found in previous studies between the amount of aromatic carbon in a bulk DOM and its sorption coefficient. DOM sorption by CMs was generally controlled by DOM aromaticity but complex sorbent surfaces with high porosity, curvatures and functional groups strongly reduced the importance of aromaticity.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32803213
doi: 10.1039/d0em00267d
doi:

Substances chimiques

Humic Substances 0
Nanotubes, Carbon 0
Organic Chemicals 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1888-1897

Auteurs

Stephanie Castan (S)

Environmental Geosciences, Centre for Microbiology and Environmental Systems Science, University of Vienna, Althanstraße, 1090 Wien, Austria. thilo.hofmann@univie.ac.at.

Gabriel Sigmund (G)

Environmental Geosciences, Centre for Microbiology and Environmental Systems Science, University of Vienna, Althanstraße, 1090 Wien, Austria. thilo.hofmann@univie.ac.at.

Thorsten Hüffer (T)

Environmental Geosciences, Centre for Microbiology and Environmental Systems Science, University of Vienna, Althanstraße, 1090 Wien, Austria. thilo.hofmann@univie.ac.at.

Nathalie Tepe (N)

Environmental Geosciences, Centre for Microbiology and Environmental Systems Science, University of Vienna, Althanstraße, 1090 Wien, Austria. thilo.hofmann@univie.ac.at.

Frank von der Kammer (F)

Environmental Geosciences, Centre for Microbiology and Environmental Systems Science, University of Vienna, Althanstraße, 1090 Wien, Austria. thilo.hofmann@univie.ac.at.

Benny Chefetz (B)

Department of Soil and Water Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environment, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, P.O. Box 12, Rehovot 7610001, Israel.

Thilo Hofmann (T)

Environmental Geosciences, Centre for Microbiology and Environmental Systems Science, University of Vienna, Althanstraße, 1090 Wien, Austria. thilo.hofmann@univie.ac.at.

Articles similaires

Anthraquinones Kinetics Water Purification Adsorption Thermodynamics
Pentachlorophenol Biodegradation, Environmental Bioreactors Adsorption Anaerobiosis
Zinc Oxide Biosensing Techniques Nanofibers Lipopolysaccharides Humans
Cellulose Enterobacter Phoeniceae Musa Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared

Classifications MeSH