Flexible fibreoptic intubation in swine - improvement for resident training and animal safety alike.


Journal

BMC anesthesiology
ISSN: 1471-2253
Titre abrégé: BMC Anesthesiol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968535

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
17 08 2020
Historique:
received: 22 04 2020
accepted: 11 08 2020
entrez: 19 8 2020
pubmed: 19 8 2020
medline: 29 9 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Efficient airway management to facilitate tracheal intubation encompasses essential skills in anaesthesiologic and intensive care. The application of flexible fibreoptic intubation in patients with difficult airways has been identified as the recommended method in various international guidelines. However, providing the opportunity to adequately train residents can be challenging. Using large animals for practice during ongoing studies could help to improve this situation, but there is no recent data on fibreoptic intubation in swine available. Thirty male German landrace pigs were anesthetized, instrumented and randomized into two groups. The animals were either intubated conventionally using direct laryngoscopy or a single-use flexible video-endoscope. The intervention was carried out by providers with 3 months experience in conventional intubation of pigs and a brief introduction into endoscopy. Intubation attempts were supervised and aborted, when SpO2 dropped below 93%. After three failed attempts, an experienced supervisor intervened and performed the intubation. Intubation times and attempts were recorded and analysed. Flexible fibreoptic intubation showed a significantly higher success rate in first attempt endotracheal tube placement (75% vs. 47%) with less attempts overall (1.3 ± 0.6 vs. 2.1 ± 1.3, P = 0.043). Conventional intubation was faster (42 s ± 6 s vs. 67 s ± 10s, P < 0.001), but showed a higher complication rate and more desaturation episodes during the trial. Flexible fibreoptic intubation in swine is feasible and appears to be a safer and more accessible method for inexperienced users to learn. This could not only improve resident training options in hospitals with animal research facilities but might also prevent airway complications and needless animal suffering.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Efficient airway management to facilitate tracheal intubation encompasses essential skills in anaesthesiologic and intensive care. The application of flexible fibreoptic intubation in patients with difficult airways has been identified as the recommended method in various international guidelines. However, providing the opportunity to adequately train residents can be challenging. Using large animals for practice during ongoing studies could help to improve this situation, but there is no recent data on fibreoptic intubation in swine available.
METHODS
Thirty male German landrace pigs were anesthetized, instrumented and randomized into two groups. The animals were either intubated conventionally using direct laryngoscopy or a single-use flexible video-endoscope. The intervention was carried out by providers with 3 months experience in conventional intubation of pigs and a brief introduction into endoscopy. Intubation attempts were supervised and aborted, when SpO2 dropped below 93%. After three failed attempts, an experienced supervisor intervened and performed the intubation. Intubation times and attempts were recorded and analysed.
RESULTS
Flexible fibreoptic intubation showed a significantly higher success rate in first attempt endotracheal tube placement (75% vs. 47%) with less attempts overall (1.3 ± 0.6 vs. 2.1 ± 1.3, P = 0.043). Conventional intubation was faster (42 s ± 6 s vs. 67 s ± 10s, P < 0.001), but showed a higher complication rate and more desaturation episodes during the trial.
CONCLUSIONS
Flexible fibreoptic intubation in swine is feasible and appears to be a safer and more accessible method for inexperienced users to learn. This could not only improve resident training options in hospitals with animal research facilities but might also prevent airway complications and needless animal suffering.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32807106
doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01127-2
pii: 10.1186/s12871-020-01127-2
pmc: PMC7430093
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

206

Subventions

Organisme : Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
ID : RU 2371/1-1
Pays : International

Références

Anaesthesia. 1994 Apr;49(4):331-4
pubmed: 8179144
Resuscitation. 2009 Sep;80(9):1066-9
pubmed: 19604619
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2006 Apr;41(4):223-7
pubmed: 16636946
Respir Care. 2014 Jun;59(6):865-78; discussion 878-80
pubmed: 24891196
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Jul-Sep;35(3):326-334
pubmed: 31543580
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2004 Jan;48(1):40-5
pubmed: 14674972
Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2014 Sep;51(3):334-43
pubmed: 24828366
J Anesth. 2016 Feb;30(1):12-9
pubmed: 26493397
Br J Anaesth. 2011 May;106(5):617-31
pubmed: 21447488
Anaesthesist. 2018 Oct;67(10):725-737
pubmed: 30291405
J Spec Oper Med. 2017 Summer;17(2):96-100
pubmed: 28599040
Can J Anaesth. 1989 Mar;36(2):141-4
pubmed: 2706711
Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 1986 Nov;2(3):677-91
pubmed: 3539275
Radiat Med. 2001 May-Jun;19(3):131-43
pubmed: 11467380
Anaesthesist. 2015 Jan;64(1):65-70
pubmed: 25384955
Anaesthesist. 2015 Dec;64 Suppl 1:27-40
pubmed: 26727936
Br J Anaesth. 2015 Dec;115(6):827-48
pubmed: 26556848
Anesthesiology. 2005 Jul;103(1):33-9
pubmed: 15983454
Anaesthesia. 2017 Jun;72(6):694-703
pubmed: 28654138
J Clin Anesth. 1989;1(5):344-9
pubmed: 2627408
Transplantation. 1999 Dec 15;68(11):1638-42
pubmed: 10609939
Vet Clin North Am Exot Anim Pract. 2010 May;13(2):273-89
pubmed: 20381777
Eur Surg Res. 2010;45(3-4):121-33
pubmed: 20924187
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2000 Apr;19(4):231-6
pubmed: 10836106
Br J Anaesth. 2003 Dec;91(6):871-7
pubmed: 14633760
Resuscitation. 2018 Nov;132:56-62
pubmed: 30176273
Lab Anim. 2012 Jul;46(3):261-3
pubmed: 22723649
Can J Anaesth. 2013 Nov;60(11):1119-38
pubmed: 24132408
Eur Radiol. 1998;8(7):1254-73
pubmed: 9724449
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010 Jan;27(1):31-5
pubmed: 19851113
Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 1986 Nov;2(3):507-16
pubmed: 3539268
Can J Vet Res. 2012 Jan;76(1):57-61
pubmed: 22754096
Vet Anaesth Analg. 2005 Sep;32(5):308-13
pubmed: 16135212
Anesthesiology. 2013 Feb;118(2):251-70
pubmed: 23364566
Lab Anim Sci. 1986 Jun;36(3):256-61
pubmed: 3724050

Auteurs

Robert Ruemmler (R)

Department of Anaesthesiology, Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany. Robert.ruemmler@email.de.

Alexander Ziebart (A)

Department of Anaesthesiology, Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.

Thomas Ott (T)

Department of Anaesthesiology, Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.

Dagmar Dirvonskis (D)

Department of Anaesthesiology, Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.

Erik Kristoffer Hartmann (EK)

Department of Anaesthesiology, Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH