Assessing the benefits and usefulness of Schwartz Centre rounds in second-year medical students using clinical educator-facilitated group work session: not just "a facilitated moan"!


Journal

BMC medical education
ISSN: 1472-6920
Titre abrégé: BMC Med Educ
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088679

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
17 Aug 2020
Historique:
received: 06 04 2020
accepted: 11 08 2020
entrez: 19 8 2020
pubmed: 19 8 2020
medline: 15 5 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

An experiential curriculum exposing medical students to the clinic early has many benefits but comes with the emotional stress this environment engenders. Schwartz rounds (SR) are an effective means to combat emotional stress and increasingly used in UK and USA hospitals. Recent studies show that the SR format may also provide benefits for medical students. This study aimed to investigate whether the guidance of SR in second year medical students provides the same benefits as to healthcare professionals. SR assessment involved 83 s year MBChB students in facilitated groupwork sessions. Topics discussed were "change and resilience" and "duty of candour". Students completed a Likert Scale questionnaire evaluating outcomes proffered by the Point of Care Foundation in collaboration with the Schwartz Foundation, with freeform feedback. There was an 86% completion rate with 25% providing written feedback. Participants were more likely to agree than disagree that SR were beneficial. SR effectiveness in enhancing students' working relationship awareness and skills was strongly correlated with understanding the purpose of, and engagement with, the SR (P < 0.001). Similarly, engagement with the SR was strongly correlated with self-reporting of enhanced patient-centredness (P < 0.001). Freeform feedback could be grouped into five themes that revolved around understanding of the SR and engagement with the process. Many positive comments regarded the SR as a forum not only to "learn experientially" but to so in a "safe environment". Many negative comments stemmed from students not seeing any benefits of engagement with the SR, in that sharing experiences was "unbeneficial", "empathy is inherent and not learnt", or that sharing emotional problems is simply "moaning". SRs are an effective way of fostering empathy and understanding towards patients and colleagues. However, for the students to benefit fully from the SR it is necessary for them to engage and understand the process. Therefore, for the successful implementation of SR into pre-clinical medical education, it is important to help students realise that SR are not merely a "facilitated whinge".

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
An experiential curriculum exposing medical students to the clinic early has many benefits but comes with the emotional stress this environment engenders. Schwartz rounds (SR) are an effective means to combat emotional stress and increasingly used in UK and USA hospitals. Recent studies show that the SR format may also provide benefits for medical students. This study aimed to investigate whether the guidance of SR in second year medical students provides the same benefits as to healthcare professionals.
METHODS METHODS
SR assessment involved 83 s year MBChB students in facilitated groupwork sessions. Topics discussed were "change and resilience" and "duty of candour". Students completed a Likert Scale questionnaire evaluating outcomes proffered by the Point of Care Foundation in collaboration with the Schwartz Foundation, with freeform feedback.
RESULTS RESULTS
There was an 86% completion rate with 25% providing written feedback. Participants were more likely to agree than disagree that SR were beneficial. SR effectiveness in enhancing students' working relationship awareness and skills was strongly correlated with understanding the purpose of, and engagement with, the SR (P < 0.001). Similarly, engagement with the SR was strongly correlated with self-reporting of enhanced patient-centredness (P < 0.001). Freeform feedback could be grouped into five themes that revolved around understanding of the SR and engagement with the process. Many positive comments regarded the SR as a forum not only to "learn experientially" but to so in a "safe environment". Many negative comments stemmed from students not seeing any benefits of engagement with the SR, in that sharing experiences was "unbeneficial", "empathy is inherent and not learnt", or that sharing emotional problems is simply "moaning".
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
SRs are an effective way of fostering empathy and understanding towards patients and colleagues. However, for the students to benefit fully from the SR it is necessary for them to engage and understand the process. Therefore, for the successful implementation of SR into pre-clinical medical education, it is important to help students realise that SR are not merely a "facilitated whinge".

Identifiants

pubmed: 32807145
doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02199-x
pii: 10.1186/s12909-020-02199-x
pmc: PMC7433116
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

271

Références

BMC Med Educ. 2016 Sep 22;16(1):246
pubmed: 27658411
Contemp Clin Dent. 2016 Jul-Sep;7(3):287-8
pubmed: 27630485
Med Educ Online. 2017;22(1):1320187
pubmed: 28460570
Int J Med Educ. 2016 Jun 12;7:188-94
pubmed: 27295403
J Health Organ Manag. 2015;29(7):973-87
pubmed: 26556163
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2019 Mar 27;8(1):34
pubmed: 30917870
J R Soc Med. 2012 Mar;105(3):117-22
pubmed: 22434811
Med Educ Online. 2017;22(1):1289315
pubmed: 28219315
BMJ Open. 2017 Jan 5;7(1):e014326
pubmed: 28057662
J Health Organ Manag. 2018 May 21;32(3):402-415
pubmed: 29771209

Auteurs

J Smith (J)

Medical School, University of Buckingham, Hunter Street, Buckingham, MK18 1EG, UK.

M G Stewart (MG)

Medical School, University of Buckingham, Hunter Street, Buckingham, MK18 1EG, UK.

E Foggin (E)

Medical School, University of Buckingham, Hunter Street, Buckingham, MK18 1EG, UK.

S Mathews (S)

Medical School, University of Buckingham, Hunter Street, Buckingham, MK18 1EG, UK.

J Harris (J)

Medical School, University of Buckingham, Hunter Street, Buckingham, MK18 1EG, UK.

P Thomas (P)

Medical School, University of Buckingham, Hunter Street, Buckingham, MK18 1EG, UK.

A Cooney (A)

Medical School, University of Buckingham, Hunter Street, Buckingham, MK18 1EG, UK.

C J Stocker (CJ)

Medical School, University of Buckingham, Hunter Street, Buckingham, MK18 1EG, UK. claire.stocker@buckingham.ac.uk.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH