MILO/ENGOT-ov11: Binimetinib Versus Physician's Choice Chemotherapy in Recurrent or Persistent Low-Grade Serous Carcinomas of the Ovary, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneum.
Adult
Aged
Benzimidazoles
/ adverse effects
Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous
/ drug therapy
Doxorubicin
/ analogs & derivatives
Fallopian Tube Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Female
Humans
MAP Kinase Kinase 1
/ antagonists & inhibitors
MAP Kinase Kinase 2
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Grading
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
/ drug therapy
Ovarian Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Paclitaxel
/ therapeutic use
Peritoneal Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Polyethylene Glycols
/ therapeutic use
Progression-Free Survival
Protein Kinase Inhibitors
/ adverse effects
Topotecan
/ therapeutic use
Young Adult
Journal
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
ISSN: 1527-7755
Titre abrégé: J Clin Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8309333
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 11 2020
10 11 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
22
8
2020
medline:
24
3
2021
entrez:
22
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Low-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (LGSOCs) have historically low chemotherapy responses. Alterations affecting the MAPK pathway, most commonly KRAS/BRAF, are present in 30%-60% of LGSOCs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate binimetinib, a potent MEK1/2 inhibitor with demonstrated activity across multiple cancers, in LGSOC. This was a 2:1 randomized study of binimetinib (45 mg twice daily) versus physician's choice chemotherapy (PCC). Eligible patients had recurrent measurable LGSOC after ≥ 1 prior platinum-based chemotherapy but ≤ 3 prior chemotherapy lines. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review (BICR); additional assessments included overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), clinical-benefit rate, biomarkers, and safety. A total of 303 patients were randomly assigned to an arm of the study at the time of interim analysis (January 20, 2016). Median PFS by BICR was 9.1 months (95% CI, 7.3 to 11.3) for binimetinib and 10.6 months (95% CI, 9.2 to 14.5) for PCC (hazard ratio,1.21; 95%CI, 0.79 to 1.86), resulting in early study closure according to a prespecified futility boundary after 341 patients had enrolled. Secondary efficacy end points were similar in the two groups: ORR 16% (complete response [CR]/partial responses[PRs], 32) versus 13% (CR/PRs, 13); median DOR, 8.1 months (range, 0.03 to ≥ 12.0 months) versus 6.7 months (0.03 to ≥ 9.7 months); and median OS, 25.3 versus 20.8 months for binimetinib and PCC, respectively. Safety results were consistent with the known safety profile of binimetinib; the most common grade ≥ 3 event was increased blood creatine kinase level (26%). Post hoc analysis suggests a possible association between Although the MEK Inhibitor in Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer Study did not meet its primary end point, binimetinib showed activity in LGSOC across the efficacy end points evaluated. A higher response to chemotherapy than expected was observed and
Identifiants
pubmed: 32822286
doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.01164
pmc: PMC7655017
doi:
Substances chimiques
Benzimidazoles
0
Protein Kinase Inhibitors
0
liposomal doxorubicin
0
binimetinib
181R97MR71
Polyethylene Glycols
3WJQ0SDW1A
Topotecan
7M7YKX2N15
Doxorubicin
80168379AG
MAP2K2 protein, human
EC 2.7.1.-
MAP Kinase Kinase 1
EC 2.7.12.2
MAP Kinase Kinase 2
EC 2.7.12.2
MAP2K1 protein, human
EC 2.7.12.2
Paclitaxel
P88XT4IS4D
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01849874']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase III
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3753-3762Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA008748
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Références
Am J Pathol. 2010 Oct;177(4):1611-7
pubmed: 20802181
Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Aug;126(2):279-85
pubmed: 22555104
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Dec 1;33(34):4099-105
pubmed: 26324360
Cancer Lett. 2005 Dec 8;230(1):1-5
pubmed: 16253755
Lancet Oncol. 2013 Feb;14(2):134-40
pubmed: 23261356
Growth Factors. 2006 Mar;24(1):21-44
pubmed: 16393692
Clin Cancer Res. 2015 Feb 15;21(4):730-8
pubmed: 25500057
Cancer. 2013 Feb 1;119(3):548-554
pubmed: 22930283
Oncotarget. 2015 Nov 10;6(35):37663-77
pubmed: 26506417
Biometrics. 1999 Sep;55(3):874-82
pubmed: 11315020
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2010 Apr;20(3):476-8
pubmed: 20375816
Oncotarget. 2014 Oct 15;5(19):8937-46
pubmed: 25313136
Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Feb;144(2):250-255
pubmed: 28062115
Ann Oncol. 2010 May;21 Suppl 5:v23-30
pubmed: 20555088
Adv Anat Pathol. 2009 Sep;16(5):267-82
pubmed: 19700937