Anatomy of a crosslinker.
Chemical reagents
Crosslinking mass spectrometry
Design of chemical reagents
Proteins structure
Protein–protein interactions
Journal
Current opinion in chemical biology
ISSN: 1879-0402
Titre abrégé: Curr Opin Chem Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9811312
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2021
02 2021
Historique:
received:
01
06
2020
revised:
10
07
2020
accepted:
13
07
2020
pubmed:
24
8
2020
medline:
20
8
2021
entrez:
24
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Crosslinking mass spectrometry has become a core technology in structural biology and is expanding its reach towards systems biology. Its appeal lies in a rapid workflow, high sensitivity and the ability to provide data on proteins in complex systems, even in whole cells. The technology depends heavily on crosslinking reagents. The anatomy of crosslinkers can be modular, sometimes comprising combinations of functional groups. These groups are defined by concepts including: reaction selectivity to increase information density, enrichability to improve detection, cleavability to enhance the identification process and isotope-labelling for quantification. Here, we argue that both concepts and functional groups need more thorough experimental evaluation, so that we can show exactly how and where they are useful when applied to crosslinkers. Crosslinker design should be driven by data, not only concepts. We focus on two crosslinker concepts with large consequences for the technology, namely reactive group reaction kinetics and enrichment groups.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32829152
pii: S1367-5931(20)30104-6
doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2020.07.008
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
39-46Subventions
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.