Sepsis related mortality of extremely low gestational age newborns after the introduction of colonization screening for multi-drug resistant organisms.
Anti-Bacterial Agents
/ therapeutic use
Antimicrobial Stewardship
Cefotaxime
/ therapeutic use
Female
Germany
Humans
Hygiene
/ standards
Infant, Extremely Premature
Infant, Newborn
Intensive Care Units, Neonatal
Logistic Models
Male
Meropenem
/ therapeutic use
Mortality
/ trends
Multivariate Analysis
Population Surveillance
Practice Guidelines as Topic
/ standards
Prospective Studies
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
/ isolation & purification
Sepsis
/ drug therapy
Colonization screening
Extremely preterm infants
Multi-drug resistant organisms
Preterm infant
Sepsis
Sepsis mortality
Journal
Antimicrobial resistance and infection control
ISSN: 2047-2994
Titre abrégé: Antimicrob Resist Infect Control
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101585411
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 08 2020
26 08 2020
Historique:
received:
11
04
2020
accepted:
12
08
2020
entrez:
27
8
2020
pubmed:
28
8
2020
medline:
3
9
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In 2013 German infection surveillance guidelines recommended weekly colonization screening for multidrug-resistant (MDRO) or highly epidemic organisms for neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) and extended hygiene measures based on screening results. It remains a matter of debate whether screening is worth the effort. We therefore aimed to evaluate sepsis related outcomes before and after the guideline update. The German Neonatal Network (GNN) is a prospective cohort study including data from extremely preterm infants between 22 + 0 and 28 + 6 gestational weeks born in 62 German level III NICUs. Infants treated after guideline update (n = 8.903) had a lower mortality (12.5% vs. 13.8%, p = 0.036), reduced rates for clinical sepsis (31.4 vs. 42.8%, p < 0.001) and culture-proven sepsis (14.4% vs. 16.5%, p = 0.003) as compared to infants treated before update (n = 3.920). In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, nine pathogens of culture-proven sepsis were associated with sepsis-related death, e.g. Pseudomonas aeruginosa [OR 59 (19-180), p < 0.001)]. However, the guideline update had no significant effect on pathogen-specific case fatality, total sepsis-related mortality and culture-proven sepsis rates with MDRO. While the exposure of GNN infants to cefotaxime declined over time (31.1 vs. 40.1%, p < 0.001), the treatment rate with meropenem was increased (31.6 vs. 26.3%, p < 0.001). The introduction of weekly screening and extended hygiene measures is associated with reduced sepsis rates, but has no effects on sepsis-related mortality and sepsis with screening-relevant pathogens. The high exposure rate to meropenem should be a target of antibiotic stewardship programs.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
In 2013 German infection surveillance guidelines recommended weekly colonization screening for multidrug-resistant (MDRO) or highly epidemic organisms for neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) and extended hygiene measures based on screening results. It remains a matter of debate whether screening is worth the effort. We therefore aimed to evaluate sepsis related outcomes before and after the guideline update.
METHODS
The German Neonatal Network (GNN) is a prospective cohort study including data from extremely preterm infants between 22 + 0 and 28 + 6 gestational weeks born in 62 German level III NICUs.
RESULTS
Infants treated after guideline update (n = 8.903) had a lower mortality (12.5% vs. 13.8%, p = 0.036), reduced rates for clinical sepsis (31.4 vs. 42.8%, p < 0.001) and culture-proven sepsis (14.4% vs. 16.5%, p = 0.003) as compared to infants treated before update (n = 3.920). In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, nine pathogens of culture-proven sepsis were associated with sepsis-related death, e.g. Pseudomonas aeruginosa [OR 59 (19-180), p < 0.001)]. However, the guideline update had no significant effect on pathogen-specific case fatality, total sepsis-related mortality and culture-proven sepsis rates with MDRO. While the exposure of GNN infants to cefotaxime declined over time (31.1 vs. 40.1%, p < 0.001), the treatment rate with meropenem was increased (31.6 vs. 26.3%, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
The introduction of weekly screening and extended hygiene measures is associated with reduced sepsis rates, but has no effects on sepsis-related mortality and sepsis with screening-relevant pathogens. The high exposure rate to meropenem should be a target of antibiotic stewardship programs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32843080
doi: 10.1186/s13756-020-00804-8
pii: 10.1186/s13756-020-00804-8
pmc: PMC7449086
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-Bacterial Agents
0
Meropenem
FV9J3JU8B1
Cefotaxime
N2GI8B1GK7
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
144Références
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018 Mar;24(3):251-257
pubmed: 28830807
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2013 Nov;98(6):F549-53
pubmed: 23792354
J Pediatr. 2018 Oct;201:106-114.e4
pubmed: 30054165
Klin Padiatr. 2013 Mar;225(2):75-80
pubmed: 23526612
Neonatology. 2017;112(3):267-273
pubmed: 28704818
Infection. 2019 Aug;47(4):557-564
pubmed: 30607897
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2017 Aug;36(8):774-779
pubmed: 28709162
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2020 Mar;105(2):190-195
pubmed: 31248963
PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e38304
pubmed: 22768043
Lancet. 2017 Oct 14;390(10104):1770-1780
pubmed: 28434651
N Engl J Med. 2017 Feb 16;376(7):617-628
pubmed: 28199816
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2019 Sep;38(9):952-957
pubmed: 31274834
Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016 Dec;21(6):388-393
pubmed: 27345372
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2019 May;104(3):F293-F297
pubmed: 29954881
Pediatrics. 2016 Apr;137(4):
pubmed: 26956103
J Hosp Infect. 2018 Aug;99(4):367-380
pubmed: 29577993
Pediatrics. 2017 Dec;140(6):
pubmed: 29162660
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1995 May;14(5):367-71
pubmed: 7638011
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 22;14(11):e0225407
pubmed: 31756213
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2018 Nov;103(6):F547-F553
pubmed: 29208666
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016 Aug;37(8):924-30
pubmed: 27143176
Neonatology. 2013;103(2):155-60
pubmed: 23235260
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2016 Jan;101(1):F72-8
pubmed: 26369370
JAMA. 2015 Sep 8;314(10):1039-51
pubmed: 26348753