Term prelabor rupture of membranes: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF).
Term prelabor rupture of membranes
antibiotic prophylaxis
induction of labor
initial management of term rupture of membranes
intrauterine and neonatal infection
Journal
The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians
ISSN: 1476-4954
Titre abrégé: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101136916
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2022
Aug 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
28
8
2020
medline:
28
6
2022
entrez:
28
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To determine the management of patients with term prelabor rupture of membranes. Synthesis of the literature from the PubMed and Cochrane databases and the recommendations of French and foreign societies and colleges. Term prelabor rupture of membranes is considered a physiological process until 12 h have passed since rupture (professional consensus). In cases of expectant management and with a low rate of antibiotic prophylaxis, home care may be associated with an increase in neonatal infections (LE3), compared with hospitalization, especially for women with group B streptococcus (GBS) colonization (LE3). Home care is therefore not recommended (grade C). In the absence of spontaneous labor within 12 h of rupture, antibiotic prophylaxis may reduce the risk of maternal intrauterine infection but not of neonatal infection (LE3). Its use after 12 h of rupture in term prelabor rupture of the membranes is therefore recommended (grade C). When antibiotic prophylaxis is indicated, intravenous beta-lactams are recommended (grade C). Induction of labor with oxytocin (LE1), prostaglandin E2 (LE1), or misoprostol (LE1) is associated with shorter rupture-to-delivery intervals than expectant management; immediate induction is not, however, associated with lower rates of neonatal infection (LE1), even among women with a positive GBS vaginal swab (LE2). Thus, expectant management can be offered without increasing the risk of neonatal infection (grade B). Induction of labor is not associated with either an increase or decrease in the cesarean rate (LE2), regardless of parity (LE2) or Bishop score at admission (LE3). Induction can thus be proposed without increasing the risk of cesarean delivery (grade B). No induction method (oxytocin, dinoprostone, misoprostol, or Foley catheter) has demonstrated superiority over any another method for reducing rates of intrauterine or neonatal infection or of cesarean delivery or for shortening the rupture-to-delivery intervals, regardless of parity or the Bishop score. Term prelabor rupture of membranes is a frequent event. A 12-hour interval without onset of spontaneous labor was chosen to differentiate a physiological condition from a potentially unsafe situation that justifies antibiotic prophylaxis. Expectant management or induction of labor can each be proposed, even in case of positive screening for group streptococcus. The decision should depend on the woman's wishes and maternity unit organization (professional consensus).
Identifiants
pubmed: 32847438
doi: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1810230
doi:
Substances chimiques
Misoprostol
0E43V0BB57
Oxytocin
50-56-6
Dinoprostone
K7Q1JQR04M
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM