Oncology education for family medicine residents: a national needs assessment survey.
Cancer
Family doctor
Family medicine
General practitioner
Medical education
Oncology
Residency
Teaching
Journal
BMC medical education
ISSN: 1472-6920
Titre abrégé: BMC Med Educ
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088679
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 Aug 2020
27 Aug 2020
Historique:
received:
28
08
2019
accepted:
24
08
2020
entrez:
29
8
2020
pubmed:
29
8
2020
medline:
15
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This study aimed to determine the current state of oncology education in Canadian family medicine postgraduate medical education programs (FM PGME) and examine opinions regarding optimal oncology education in these programs. A survey was designed to evaluate ideal and current oncology teaching, educational topics, objectives, and competencies in FM PGMEs. The survey was sent to Canadian family medicine (FM) residents and program directors (PDs). In total, 150 residents and 17 PDs affiliated with 16 of 17 Canadian medical schools completed the survey. The majority indicated their programs do not have a mandatory clinical rotation in oncology (79% residents, 88% PDs). Low rates of residents (7%) and PDs (13%) reported FM residents being adequately prepared for their role in caring for cancer patients (p = 0.03). Residents and PDs believed the most optimal method of teaching oncology is through clinical exposure (65% residents, 80% PDs). Residents and PDs agreed the most important topics to learn (rated ≥4.7 on 5-point Likert scale) were: performing pap smears, cancer screening/prevention, breaking bad news, and approach to patient with increased cancer risk. According to residents, other important topics such as appropriate cancer patient referrals, managing cancer complications and post-treatment surveillance were only taught at frequencies of 52, 40 and 36%, respectively. Current FM PGME oncology education is suboptimal, although the degree differs in the opinion of residents and PDs. This study identified topics and methods of education which could be focussed upon to improve FM oncology education.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
This study aimed to determine the current state of oncology education in Canadian family medicine postgraduate medical education programs (FM PGME) and examine opinions regarding optimal oncology education in these programs.
METHODS
METHODS
A survey was designed to evaluate ideal and current oncology teaching, educational topics, objectives, and competencies in FM PGMEs. The survey was sent to Canadian family medicine (FM) residents and program directors (PDs).
RESULTS
RESULTS
In total, 150 residents and 17 PDs affiliated with 16 of 17 Canadian medical schools completed the survey. The majority indicated their programs do not have a mandatory clinical rotation in oncology (79% residents, 88% PDs). Low rates of residents (7%) and PDs (13%) reported FM residents being adequately prepared for their role in caring for cancer patients (p = 0.03). Residents and PDs believed the most optimal method of teaching oncology is through clinical exposure (65% residents, 80% PDs). Residents and PDs agreed the most important topics to learn (rated ≥4.7 on 5-point Likert scale) were: performing pap smears, cancer screening/prevention, breaking bad news, and approach to patient with increased cancer risk. According to residents, other important topics such as appropriate cancer patient referrals, managing cancer complications and post-treatment surveillance were only taught at frequencies of 52, 40 and 36%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Current FM PGME oncology education is suboptimal, although the degree differs in the opinion of residents and PDs. This study identified topics and methods of education which could be focussed upon to improve FM oncology education.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32854702
doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02207-0
pii: 10.1186/s12909-020-02207-0
pmc: PMC7457241
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
283Subventions
Organisme : Department of Oncology, University of Calgary
ID : NA
Références
J Cancer Educ. 2016 Sep;31(3):541-6
pubmed: 25943900
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Mar;54(3):444-448
pubmed: 29241720
J Cancer Surviv. 2014 Dec;8(4):565-70
pubmed: 24820428
CMAJ Open. 2016 Jul 14;4(3):E359-E364
pubmed: 27730100
Lancet. 2010 Dec 4;376(9756):1923-58
pubmed: 21112623
J Cancer Educ. 2009;24(4):284-90
pubmed: 19838886
Can Fam Physician. 2013 Jun;59(6):e290-7
pubmed: 23766068
Curr Oncol. 2014 Feb;21(1):e75-88
pubmed: 24523624