Automated brainstem volumetry can aid in the diagnostics of parkinsonian disorders.
Aged
Brain Stem
/ diagnostic imaging
Diagnosis, Differential
Female
Humans
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
/ methods
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Middle Aged
Multiple System Atrophy
/ diagnostic imaging
Neuroimaging
/ methods
Parkinson Disease
/ diagnostic imaging
Reproducibility of Results
Retrospective Studies
Supranuclear Palsy, Progressive
/ diagnostic imaging
Magnetic resonance imaging
Multiple
Parkinson's disease
Parkinsonism
Progressive supranuclear palsy
System atrophy
Journal
Parkinsonism & related disorders
ISSN: 1873-5126
Titre abrégé: Parkinsonism Relat Disord
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9513583
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2020
10 2020
Historique:
received:
21
11
2019
revised:
30
06
2020
accepted:
04
08
2020
pubmed:
29
8
2020
medline:
3
2
2022
entrez:
29
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Separating progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) from Parkinson's disease (PD) and multiple system atrophy (MSA) is often challenging in early disease but is important for appropriate management. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can aid the diagnostics and manual 2D measurements are often used. However, new fully automatic brainstem volumetry could potentially be more accurate and increase availability of brainstem metrics. Clinical 3D T1-weighted MRI were obtained from 196 consecutive patients; 29 PSP, 27 MSA, 140 PD. Midbrain-pons ratio and magnetic resonance parkinsonism index (MRPI) 1.0 and 2.0 were manually calculated, and intra-rater and inter-rater reliability was assessed. FreeSurfer was used to automatically segment brainstem substructures, normalized to the intracranial volume. The robustness of the automated analysis was evaluated in 3 healthy controls. The diagnostic accuracy of the brainstem biomarkers was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curves. Automatic brainstem volumetry had good repeatability/reproducibility with intra-scanner coefficient of variation 0.3-5.5% and inter-scanner coefficient of variation 0.9-8.4% in the different brainstem regions. Midbrain volume performs better than planimetric measurements in separating PSP from PD (Area under the curve (AUC) 0.90 compared with 0.81 for midbrain-pons ratio (p = 0.019), 0.77 for MRPI 1.0 (p = 0.007) and 0.81 for MRPI 2.0 (p = 0.021)). Midbrain volume performed on par with planimetry for separation between PSP and MSA. Automatic brainstem segmentation is robust and shows promising diagnostic performance in separating PSP from PD and MSA. If further developed, it could play a role in diagnosing PSP and could potentially be used as an outcome in clinical trials.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32858488
pii: S1353-8020(20)30670-2
doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2020.08.004
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
18-25Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.