Behavioural diversity of bonobo prey preference as a potential cultural trait.
Hunting
Pan paniscus
culture
evolutionary biology
group specific
intergroup dynamics
Journal
eLife
ISSN: 2050-084X
Titre abrégé: Elife
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101579614
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 09 2020
01 09 2020
Historique:
received:
21
05
2020
accepted:
31
07
2020
entrez:
2
9
2020
pubmed:
2
9
2020
medline:
26
2
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The importance of cultural processes to behavioural diversity in our closest living relatives is central to revealing the evolutionary origins of human culture. However, the bonobo is often overlooked as a candidate model. Further, a prominent critique to many examples of proposed animal cultures is premature exclusion of environmental confounds known to shape behavioural phenotypes. We addressed these gaps by investigating variation in prey preference between neighbouring bonobo groups that associate and overlap space use. We find group preference for duiker or anomalure hunting otherwise unexplained by variation in spatial usage, seasonality, or hunting party size, composition, and cohesion. Our findings demonstrate that group-specific behaviours emerge independently of the local ecology, indicating that hunting techniques in bonobos may be culturally transmitted. The tolerant intergroup relations of bonobos offer an ideal context to explore drivers of behavioural phenotypes, the essential investigations for phylogenetic constructs of the evolutionary origins of culture. No human culture is quite like the next. Societies around the world show exceptional variety in their social norms, beliefs, customs, language and, of course, food. However, the origins of human culture still remain elusive. Studying humans’ closest living relatives, the great apes, is one way to explore how human culture first appeared. Chimpanzees are often studied for this purpose, but other great apes, such as bonobos, are often overlooked. Yet bonobos are less territorial and more tolerant to others than chimpanzees, with different bonobo groups sharing feeding spots and hunting grounds. These traits actually make bonobos an ideal animal for investigating whether differences in group behaviour, such as feeding habits, are distinct cultural trends or just a result of their surrounding environments. With this in mind, Samuni et al. studied the hunting and feeding patterns of two groups of wild bonobos in the Kokolopori Bonobo Reserve in the Democratic Republic of Congo. The two groups share approximately 65% of their home territory, allowing Samuni et al. to examine whether any differences in hunting preferences persisted when the two groups looked for prey in the same environment. The analysis would reveal whether social factors or environmental conditions influenced the hunting and feeding habits of each group. Samuni et al. found the first bonobo group specialized in hunting duiker, a type of antelope, whereas the second group preferred to hunt tree-gliding rodents. However, the location and timing of the bonobo’s hunts did not determine which types of prey they hunted. Across their territory, and regardless of group size or the dynamics between males and females, the groups continued to hunt their preferred prey. This means ecology alone cannot explain bonobo feeding habits and instead, the findings provide a strong indication for cultural variation between the two groups. Since social learning is a part of cultural development, the next challenge will be to determine if and how these group hunting preferences are learned by young bonobos in their social group. For now, these findings provide a glimpse into the emergence of group culture.
Autres résumés
Type: plain-language-summary
(eng)
No human culture is quite like the next. Societies around the world show exceptional variety in their social norms, beliefs, customs, language and, of course, food. However, the origins of human culture still remain elusive. Studying humans’ closest living relatives, the great apes, is one way to explore how human culture first appeared. Chimpanzees are often studied for this purpose, but other great apes, such as bonobos, are often overlooked. Yet bonobos are less territorial and more tolerant to others than chimpanzees, with different bonobo groups sharing feeding spots and hunting grounds. These traits actually make bonobos an ideal animal for investigating whether differences in group behaviour, such as feeding habits, are distinct cultural trends or just a result of their surrounding environments. With this in mind, Samuni et al. studied the hunting and feeding patterns of two groups of wild bonobos in the Kokolopori Bonobo Reserve in the Democratic Republic of Congo. The two groups share approximately 65% of their home territory, allowing Samuni et al. to examine whether any differences in hunting preferences persisted when the two groups looked for prey in the same environment. The analysis would reveal whether social factors or environmental conditions influenced the hunting and feeding habits of each group. Samuni et al. found the first bonobo group specialized in hunting duiker, a type of antelope, whereas the second group preferred to hunt tree-gliding rodents. However, the location and timing of the bonobo’s hunts did not determine which types of prey they hunted. Across their territory, and regardless of group size or the dynamics between males and females, the groups continued to hunt their preferred prey. This means ecology alone cannot explain bonobo feeding habits and instead, the findings provide a strong indication for cultural variation between the two groups. Since social learning is a part of cultural development, the next challenge will be to determine if and how these group hunting preferences are learned by young bonobos in their social group. For now, these findings provide a glimpse into the emergence of group culture.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32869740
doi: 10.7554/eLife.59191
pii: 59191
pmc: PMC7462605
doi:
pii:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© 2020, Samuni et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
LS, FW, MS No competing interests declared
Références
Bioessays. 2019 Nov;41(11):e1900060
pubmed: 31631360
Commun Biol. 2018 Sep 10;1:138
pubmed: 30272017
R Soc Open Sci. 2017 May 3;4(5):161081
pubmed: 28573000
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Dec 5;370(1683):20150005
pubmed: 26503679
Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2018;72(5):80
pubmed: 29755181
Curr Biol. 2010 Jun 22;20(12):R507-8
pubmed: 20620900
Sci Rep. 2019 Jun 4;9(1):8260
pubmed: 31164683
Trends Ecol Evol. 2006 Oct;21(10):542-7
pubmed: 16806574
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999 Apr;53(4):235-8
pubmed: 10396550
Science. 2003 Jan 3;299(5603):102-5
pubmed: 12511649
PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e21514
pubmed: 21747938
Folia Primatol (Basel). 2008;79(2):103-10
pubmed: 17975315
Primates. 2016 Jul;57(3):295-301
pubmed: 26968409
Nat Commun. 2019 Jun 3;10(1):2405
pubmed: 31160560
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jan 10;114(2):268-273
pubmed: 28028227
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 21;12(6):e0178065
pubmed: 28636646
Folia Primatol (Basel). 2019;90(3):179-189
pubmed: 30889597
Nat Commun. 2012;3:980
pubmed: 22864573
Am J Primatol. 2014 Jul;76(7):649-57
pubmed: 24482055
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jul 25;114(30):7790-7797
pubmed: 28739927