Induction of labor at second delivery subsequent to a primary cesarean: is stage of labor at previous cesarean a factor?
Adult
Analgesia, Epidural
/ adverse effects
Birth Weight
Cesarean Section
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Gestational Age
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Israel
Labor, Induced
Labor, Obstetric
Oxytocin
/ administration & dosage
Pregnancy
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Tertiary Care Centers
/ statistics & numerical data
Vaginal Birth after Cesarean
/ statistics & numerical data
Induction of labor
Previous cesarean
Stage of labor
Journal
Archives of gynecology and obstetrics
ISSN: 1432-0711
Titre abrégé: Arch Gynecol Obstet
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8710213
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2021
03 2021
Historique:
received:
26
05
2020
accepted:
26
08
2020
pubmed:
2
9
2020
medline:
1
4
2021
entrez:
2
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Parturients with a history of a cesarean delivery (CD) in the first delivery (P1), undergoing induction of labor (IOL) in the subsequent delivery (P2) are at increased risk for obstetric complications. The primary aim was to study if "the stage of labor" at previous cesarean (elective/latent/first/second) is associated with a successful IOL. The secondary aim was to search for other obstetric characteristics associated with a successful IOL. A retrospective longitudinal follow-up study in a large tertiary medical center. All parturients at term who underwent IOL at P2 with a singleton fetus in cephalic presentation, with a prior CD, between the years 2006 and 2014 were included. A univariate analysis was performed including the stage of labor at previous cesarean, birth weight of newborn at P1 and P2, gestational week of delivery at P2, time of interpregnancy interval, indication and mode of IOL, epidural analgesia and augmentation of labor at P2. Significant factors were incorporated in a multivariate logistic regression model. During the study period, 150 parturients underwent IOL (P2) subsequent to a previous CD (P1). VBAC was achieved in 78 (52%). We found no association between the stages of labor in which the previous CD was performed to a successful IOL. Applying the multivariate logistic regression revealed that augmentation of labor with oxytocin, OR 4.17, [1.73-10.05], epidural analgesia OR 3.30 [1.12-9.73] and birth weight (P2) < 4000 g, OR 5.88, [1.11-33.33] were associated with a successful IOL. The stage of labor at previous CD should not be incorporated among the variables found to be associated with a successful IOL. As a result of our findings, clinician's will be able to adjust a personalized consult prior to initiating IOL.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32870344
doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05776-z
pii: 10.1007/s00404-020-05776-z
doi:
Substances chimiques
Oxytocin
50-56-6
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
659-663Références
Boerma T, Ronsmans C, Melesse DY, Barros AJD, Barros FC, Juan L, Moller AB, Say L, Hosseinpoor AR, Yi M, de Lyra Rabello Neto D, Temmerman M (2018) Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections. Lancet 392(10155):1341–1348
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31928-7
Betran AP, Torloni MR, Zhang J et al (2015) What is the optimal rate of caesarean section at population level? A systematic review of ecologic studies. Reprod Health 12:57
doi: 10.1186/s12978-015-0043-6
Visser GHA, Ayres-de-Campos D, Barnea ER, de Bernis L, Di Renzo GC, Vidarte MFE, Lloyd I, Nassar AH, Nicholson W, Shah PK, Stones W, Sun L, Theron GB, Walani S (2018) FIGO position paper: how to stop the caesarean section epidemic. Lancet 392(10155):1286–1287
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32113-5
Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt VL, Easterling TR, Martin DP (2001) Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 345:3–8
doi: 10.1056/NEJM200107053450101
Rageth JC, Juzi C, Grossenbacher H (1999) Delivery after previous cesarean: a risk evaluation. Swiss working group of obstetric and gynecologic institutions. Obstet Gynecol 93:332–337
pubmed: 10074973
Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Leindecker S, Varner MW et al (2004) Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 351:2581–2589
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040405
Kwee A, Bots ML, Visser GHA, Bruinse HW (2006) Obstetric management and outcome of pregnancy in women with a history of caesarean section in the Netherlands. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 132:171–176
doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.07.017
Agnew G, Turner MJ (2009) Vaginal prostaglandin gel to induce labour in women with one previous caesarean section. J Obstet Gynaecol (Lahore) 29:209–211
doi: 10.1080/01443610902743789
Ye J, Betran AP, Guerrero Vela M, Souza JP, Zhang J (2014) Searching for the optimal rate of medically necessary cesarean delivery. Birth 41:237–244
doi: 10.1111/birt.12104
WHO recommendations: non-clinical interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/275377/9789241550338-eng.pdf?ua=1 . Accessed 29 Feb 2020
Kugelman N, Sagi-Dain L, Kleifeld S, Kedar R, Bardicef M, Toledano-Hacohen M, Damti A (2020) Can recurrent cesarean section due to arrest of descent be predicted by newborn weight difference? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 245:73–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.12.008 (Epub 2019 Dec 23)
doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.12.008
pubmed: 31881374