Building collaborative leadership: A qualitative evaluation of the Australian Collaborative Pairs trial.
co creation
collaborative practice
consumer
consumer engagement
consumer involvement
health system
leadership
Journal
Health & social care in the community
ISSN: 1365-2524
Titre abrégé: Health Soc Care Community
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9306359
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2022
02 2022
Historique:
revised:
16
06
2020
received:
27
02
2020
accepted:
06
08
2020
pubmed:
3
9
2020
medline:
8
4
2022
entrez:
3
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The need to reorient the health system to ensure greater involvement of consumers in healthcare has, in recent years, been highlighted as a priority in both literature and policy. This change requires renegotiating power relations among health organisations, health professionals and health consumers. This study presents findings from a trial of a program designed to foster collaborative relationships between clinicians and consumers of health services in the Australian setting. The King's Fund Collaborative Pairs program is a leadership development program that brings together a consumer, patient or community leader to work together in pairs with a service provider clinician or manager to develop new ways of working together. The trial involved 88 participants paired together undertaking one of seven programs conducted from October 2018 to August 2019. Participants were guided through a series of activities in five face-to-face sessions run by facilitators trained by the King's Fund. A qualitative evaluation was undertaken via semi-structured interviews (n = 40) with organisations involved, facilitators and participants. A brief review of program documentation was also included. Thematic analysis was undertaken to evaluate program acceptability, implementation and to identify program impacts. The evaluation, although limited in scope, found the program changed the way some participants understood the nature of consumer and provider relationships and how collaborative working relationships could be developed. The impact of the program on organisations sponsoring participants was less evident as numbers of participants from each organisation were limited and the time required for cultural change to develop is typically longer than the evaluation period allowed for. We highlight key recommendations addressing program recruitment, facilitation and format to inform future iterations of the program.
Types de publication
Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
509-518Subventions
Organisme : The evaluation was supported by funding provided by the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care
Informations de copyright
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Bombard, Y., Baker, G. R., Orlando, E., Fancott, C., Bhatia, P., Casalino, S., … Pomey, M.-P. (2018). Engaging patients to improve quality of care: A systematic review. Implementation Science, 13(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0784-z
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brett, J., Staniszewska, S., Mockford, C., Herron-Marx, S., Hughes, J., Tysall, C., & Suleman, R. (2014). A systematic review of the impact of patient and public involvement on service users, Researchers and communities. The Patient - Patient-centered Outcomes Research, 7(4), 387-395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-014-0065-0
Carman, K. L., Dardess, P., Maurer, M., Sofaer, S., Adams, K., Bechtel, C., & Sweeney, J. (2013). Patient and family engagement: A framework for understanding the elements and developing interventions and policies. Health Affairs, 32(2), 223-231. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1133
Consumers Health Forum of Australia. (2017a). Collaborative Pairs Australia: An overview. Author.
Consumers Health Forum of Australia. (2017b). Collaborative Pairs Australia: Collaborative Pairs and National Health Reform. Author.
Coulter, A., Roberts, S., & Dixon, A. (2013). Delivering better services for people with long-term conditions: Building the house of care. London. Retrieved from https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/sites/default/files/field/field_publication_file/delivering-better-services-for-people-with-long-term-conditions.pdf
Department of Health. Primary Health networks. Retrieved from https://www1.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/PHN-Home
Elg, M., Engström, J., Witell, L., & Poksinska, B. (2012). Co-creation and learning in healthcare service development. Journal of Service Management, 23(3), 328-343. https://doi.org/10.1108/09564231211248435
Foot, C., Gilburt, H., Dunn, P., Jabbal, J., Seale, B., Goodrich, J., … Taylor, J. (2014). People in control of their own health and care: The state of involvement. London. Retrieved from https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/sites/default/files/field/field_publication_file/people-in-control-of-their-own-health-and-care-the-state-of-involvement-november-2014.pdf
Ford, J. D., & Ford, L. W. (1995). The role of conversations in producing intentional change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 541-570. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1995.9508080330
Gardner, K., Dickinson, H., & Moon, K. (2019). Re-orienting health systems through a commissioning approach: Finding solutions for improved consumer engagement. Health Research Policy and Systems, 17(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0471-9
Gold, M., Hossain, M., & Mangum, A. (2015). Consumer Engagement in Health IT: Distinguishing rhetoric from reality. eGEMs, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.13063/2327-9214.1190
Happell, B., & Roper, C. (2006). The myth of representation: The case for consumer leadership. Australian e-Journal for the Advancement of Mental Health, 5(3), 177-184. https://doi.org/10.5172/jamh.5.3.177
Heidenreich, S., Wittkowski, K., Handrich, M., & Falk, T. (2015). The dark side of customer co-creation: Exploring the consequences of failed co-created services. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(3), 279-296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0387-4
Hibbard, J. H., & Greene, J. (2013). What the evidence shows about patient activation: Better health outcomes and care experiences; fewer data on costs. Health Affairs, 32(2), 207-214. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1061
Janamian, T., Crossland, L., & Wells, L. (2016). On the road to value co-creation in health care: The role of consumers in defining the destination, planning the journey and sharing the drive. Medical Journal of Australia, 204(7), S12. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja16.00123
Joiner, K., & Lusch, R. F. (2016). Evolving to a new service-dominant logic for health care. Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Health, (3), 25-33. https://doi.org/10.2147/IEH.S93473
Lloyd, C., & King, R. (2003). Consumer and carer participation in mental health services. Australasian Psychiatry, 11(2), 180-184. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1039-8562.2003.00537.x
Mannion, R., Davies, H. T. O., & Marshall, M. N. (2005). Cultures for performance in health care. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Ocloo, J., & Matthews, R. (2016). From tokenism to empowerment: Progressing patient and public involvement in healthcare improvement. BMJ Quality & Safety, 25(8), 626-632. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004839
Petta, K., Smith, R., Chaseling, M., & Markopoulos, C. (2019). Generative dialogue: A concept analysis. Management in Education, 33(2), 53-61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892020618780978
Scholz, B., Bocking, J., & Happell, B. (2017). How do consumer leaders co-create value in mental health organisations? Australian Health Review, 41(5), 505. https://doi.org/10.1071/AH16105
Seale, B. (2016). Patients as partners: Building collaborative relationships among professionals, patients, carer and communities. London. Retrieved from https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/sites/default/files/field/field_publication_file/Patients_as_partners.pdf
Smith, J. A. (1995). The search for meanings: Semi-structured interviewing and qualitative analysis. In J. A. Smith, R. Harre, & L. Van Langenhove (Eds.), Rethinking methods in psychology (pp. 9-26). London, UK: Sage.
Stewart, S., Scholz, B., Gordon, S., & Happell, B. (2019). ‘It depends what you mean by leadership’: An analysis of stakeholder perspectives on consumer leadership. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 28(1), 339-350. https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12542
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.68.1.1.24036
Weissman, J. S., Millenson, M. L., & Haring, R. S. (2017). Patient-centered care: turning the rhetoric into reality. The American Journal of Managed Care, 23(1), e31-e32. (Accession No. 28141938).