Comparative genome analysis of novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) from different geographical locations and the effect of mutations on major target proteins: An in silico insight.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2020
Historique:
received: 30 04 2020
accepted: 14 08 2020
entrez: 4 9 2020
pubmed: 4 9 2020
medline: 18 9 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

A novel severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) causing COVID-19 pandemic in humans, recently emerged and has exported in more than 200 countries as a result of rapid spread. In this study, we have made an attempt to investigate the SARS-CoV-2 genome reported from 13 different countries, identification of mutations in major coronavirus proteins of these different SARS-CoV-2 genomes and compared with SARS-CoV. These thirteen complete genome sequences of SARS-CoV-2 showed high identity (>99%) to each other, while they shared 82% identity with SARS-CoV. Here, we performed a very systematic mutational analysis of SARS-CoV-2 genomes from different geographical locations, which enabled us to identify numerous unique features of this viral genome. This includes several important country-specific unique mutations in the major proteins of SARS-CoV-2 namely, replicase polyprotein, spike glycoprotein, envelope protein and nucleocapsid protein. Indian strain showed mutation in spike glycoprotein at R408I and in replicase polyprotein at I671T, P2144S and A2798V,. While the spike protein of Spain & South Korea carried F797C and S221W mutation, respectively. Likewise, several important country specific mutations were analyzed. The effect of mutations of these major proteins were also investigated using various in silico approaches. Main protease (Mpro), the therapeutic target protein of SARS with maximum reported inhibitors, was thoroughly investigated and the effect of mutation on the binding affinity and structural dynamics of Mpro was studied. It was found that the R60C mutation in Mpro affects the protein dynamics, thereby, affecting the binding of inhibitor within its active site. The implications of mutation on structural characteristics were determined. The information provided in this manuscript holds great potential in further scientific research towards the design of potential vaccine candidates/small molecular inhibitor against COVID19.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32881907
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238344
pii: PONE-D-20-12188
pmc: PMC7470274
doi:

Substances chimiques

Coronavirus Envelope Proteins 0
Coronavirus Nucleocapsid Proteins 0
Nucleocapsid Proteins 0
Phosphoproteins 0
Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus 0
Viral Envelope Proteins 0
Viral Nonstructural Proteins 0
envelope protein, SARS-CoV-2 0
nucleocapsid phosphoprotein, SARS-CoV-2 0
spike protein, SARS-CoV-2 0
Cysteine Endopeptidases EC 3.4.22.-
Coronavirus 3C Proteases EC 3.4.22.28

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0238344

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors of this paper have the journal’s policy and have the following competing interests: Abd-ElAziem Farouk is an employee of GmbH. However, GmbH did not provide financial support for this study. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. There are no patents, products in development or marketed products associated with this research to declare.

Références

J Virol. 2004 Feb;78(3):1602-3
pubmed: 14722315
Cell Mol Life Sci. 2004 Nov;61(21):2738-43
pubmed: 15549175
N Engl J Med. 2003 May 15;348(20):1967-76
pubmed: 12690091
Adv Virus Res. 2006;66:193-292
pubmed: 16877062
Emerg Infect Dis. 2013 Nov;19(11):1819-23
pubmed: 24206838
Life Sci. 2020 Aug 15;255:117831
pubmed: 32450166
Science. 2020 May 15;368(6492):779-782
pubmed: 32277040
Science. 2005 Sep 16;309(5742):1864-8
pubmed: 16166518
Proteins. 2006 Mar 1;62(4):1125-32
pubmed: 16372356
FEBS Lett. 2013 Jan 16;587(2):120-7
pubmed: 23178926
J Virol. 2004 May;78(9):4552-60
pubmed: 15078936
J Virol. 2005 Dec;79(24):15199-208
pubmed: 16306591
Nucleic Acids Res. 2010 Jan;38(1):203-14
pubmed: 19875418
Nature. 2020 Mar;579(7798):270-273
pubmed: 32015507
Lancet. 2020 Feb 22;395(10224):565-574
pubmed: 32007145
Viruses. 2010 Aug;2(8):1804-20
pubmed: 21994708
PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e32131
pubmed: 22384157
Curr Protoc Bioinformatics. 2016 Jun 20;54:5.6.1-5.6.37
pubmed: 27322406
J Mol Graph Model. 1999 Feb;17(1):57-61
pubmed: 10660911
Viruses. 2012 Mar;4(3):363-82
pubmed: 22590676
PLoS Pathog. 2014 May 01;10(5):e1004077
pubmed: 24788150
Science. 2003 Oct 10;302(5643):276-8
pubmed: 12958366
Lancet Infect Dis. 2014 Feb;14(2):140-5
pubmed: 24355866
N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 20;382(8):727-733
pubmed: 31978945
Oncotarget. 2017 Feb 21;8(8):12686-12694
pubmed: 27050368
J Chem Theory Comput. 2012 Apr 10;8(4):1409-1414
pubmed: 22754404
N Engl J Med. 2012 Nov 8;367(19):1814-20
pubmed: 23075143
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2009 Mar;7(3):226-36
pubmed: 19198616
J Biol Chem. 2006 Jun 9;281(23):15829-36
pubmed: 16597622
PLoS Pathog. 2017 Nov 30;13(11):e1006698
pubmed: 29190287
Virol J. 2019 May 27;16(1):69
pubmed: 31133031
Nature. 2013 Nov 28;503(7477):535-8
pubmed: 24172901
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 05;9(12):e112456
pubmed: 25479359
J Med Virol. 2020 Jun;92(6):667-674
pubmed: 32167180
F1000Res. 2020 Feb 21;9:129
pubmed: 32194944
FEBS Lett. 2004 Oct 8;576(1-2):174-8
pubmed: 15474033
Science. 2003 Jun 13;300(5626):1763-7
pubmed: 12746549
Bioorg Med Chem. 2015 Feb 15;23(4):876-90
pubmed: 25614110
Cell Mol Immunol. 2020 Jun;17(6):613-620
pubmed: 32203189
J Med Virol. 2020 Jun;92(6):584-588
pubmed: 32083328
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020 Apr;24(8):4529-4536
pubmed: 32373991
J Virol. 2008 May;82(10):5084-8
pubmed: 18353961
Virology. 2019 Nov;537:198-207
pubmed: 31505321
Nat Microbiol. 2020 Apr;5(4):536-544
pubmed: 32123347
PLoS Biol. 2018 Aug 13;16(8):e3000003
pubmed: 30102691
J Virol. 2005 Sep;79(18):11892-900
pubmed: 16140765
Nature. 2020 Jun;582(7811):289-293
pubmed: 32272481
J Chem Theory Comput. 2011 Oct 11;7(10):3162-3180
pubmed: 22125473
J Virol. 2009 Jan;83(2):908-17
pubmed: 18971277
Emerg Infect Dis. 2005 Dec;11(12):1860-5
pubmed: 16485471
J Biomed Sci. 2018 May 24;25(1):47
pubmed: 29793506
Proteins. 1998 Sep 1;32(4):438-58
pubmed: 9726415

Auteurs

Mohd Imran Khan (MI)

Department of Biophysics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

Zainul A Khan (ZA)

Department of Plant Molecular Biology, University of Delhi South Campus, New Delhi, India.

Mohammad Hassan Baig (MH)

Department of Family Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Irfan Ahmad (I)

Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Research Center for Advanced Materials Science, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.

Abd-ElAziem Farouk (AE)

Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Science, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.

Young Goo Song (YG)

Department of Infectious Diseases, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

Jae-Jun Dong (JJ)

Department of Family Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Articles similaires

Genome, Chloroplast Phylogeny Genetic Markers Base Composition High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
Photosynthesis Ribulose-Bisphosphate Carboxylase Carbon Dioxide Molecular Dynamics Simulation Cyanobacteria
T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory Lung Neoplasms Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras) Animals Humans

Pathogenic mitochondrial DNA mutations inhibit melanoma metastasis.

Spencer D Shelton, Sara House, Luiza Martins Nascentes Melo et al.
1.00
DNA, Mitochondrial Humans Melanoma Mutation Neoplasm Metastasis

Classifications MeSH