Real-world comparative effectiveness of shockwave lithotripsy versus ureterorenoscopy for the treatment of urinary stones.
Comparative effectiveness
Shockwave lithotripsy
Treatment outcome
Ureterorenoscopy
Urolithiasis
Journal
World journal of urology
ISSN: 1433-8726
Titre abrégé: World J Urol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8307716
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2021
Jun 2021
Historique:
received:
10
02
2020
accepted:
30
08
2020
pubmed:
11
9
2020
medline:
9
10
2021
entrez:
10
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To identify clinical and non-clinical predictors of treatment failure and perioperative complications following ureterorenoscopy versus shockwave lithotripsy. The New York State Department of Health Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) database was used to identify 226,331 patients who underwent index ureteroscopy or shockwave lithotripsy for renal stones from 2000 to 2016. Propensity-matched generalized linear-mixed modeling was utilized to compare failure and complication rates between the two procedure groups. 219,383 individuals meeting inclusion criteria who underwent either ureterorenoscopy (n = 124,342) or shockwave lithotripsy (n = 95,041) in New York State between 2000 and 2016 were included in our analysis. After propensity score matching, patients undergoing shockwave lithotripsy were found to have decreased odds of experiencing any type of 30-day complication (P < 0.001 for all) but increased odds of treatment failure at both 90 (OR 1.70, 95% CI 1.64-1.77) and 180 (OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.76-1.89) days (P < 0.001 for both). Patients undergoing shockwave lithotripsy experienced significantly higher odds of treatment failure, although this undesirable outcome appears to be partially offset by lower 30-day complication rates.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32909172
doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03430-6
pii: 10.1007/s00345-020-03430-6
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2177-2182Références
Scales CD Jr, Smith AC, Hanley JM, Saigal CS (2012) Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States. Eur Urol 62:160–165
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.03.052
Litwin MS SC (eds) (2012) Chapter 9 urinary tract stones in urologic diseases in America. US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC; NIH Publication No. 12-7865
Assimos D, Krambeck A, Miller NL, Monga M, Murad MH, Nelson CP et al (2016) Surgical management of stones: American urological association/endourological society guideline, PART I. J Urol 196:1153–1160
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.090
Scales CD Jr, Krupski TL, Curtis LH, Matlaga B, Lotan Y, Pearle MS et al (2011) Practice variation in the surgical management of urinary lithiasis. J Urol 186:146–150
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.03.018
Scales CD Jr, Lai JC, Dick AW, Hanley JM, van Meijgaard J, Setodji CM et al (2014) Comparative effectiveness of shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for treating patients with kidney stones. JAMA surgery 149:648–653
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.336
San Juan J, Hou H, Ghani KR, Dupree JM, Hollingsworth JM (2018) Variation in spending around surgical episodes of urinary stone disease: findings from Michigan. J Urol 199:1277–1282
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.11.075
Printz C (2015) MACRA paves way for changes in reimbursements: Physicians hopeful law will lead to more value-based care. Cancer 121:2103–2104
doi: 10.1002/cncr.28997
Chughtai B, Friedlander DF, Trinh QD (2017) Does low-value care affect urologists? Eur Urol 71:304–305
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.016
Feinstein L MB, project investigators; Litwin MS, Saigal CS (eds) (2018) Urologic diseases in America. US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC; NIH Publication No. 12-7865
Hollingsworth JM, Saigal CS, Lai JC, Dunn RL, Strope SA, Hollenbeck BK (2012) Medicare payments for outpatient urological surgery by location of care. J Urol 188:2323–2327
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.031
Preminger GM, Tiselius HG, Assimos DG, Alken P, Buck C, Gallucci M et al (2007) 2007 guideline for the management of ureteral calculi. J Urol 178:2418–2434
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.09.107
Haukoos JS, Lewis RJ (2015) The propensity score. JAMA 314:1637–1638
doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.13480
Matlaga BR, Jansen JP, Meckley LM, Byrne TW, Lingeman JE (2012) Economic outcomes of treatment for ureteral and renal stones: a systematic literature review. J Urol 188:449–454
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.04.008
Scales CD, Saigal CS, Hanley JM, Dick AW, Setodji CM, Litwin MS (2014) The impact of unplanned postprocedure visits in the management of patients with urinary stones. Surgery 155:769–775
doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.12.013
Papanicolas I, Woskie LR, Jha AK (2018) Health care spending in the United states and other high-income countries. JAMA 319:1024
doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.1150