Dioecy Is Associated with High Genetic Diversity and Adaptation Rates in the Plant Genus Silene.
Allee effect
RNA-seq
angiosperms
population genetics
selection efficacy
sexual systems
Journal
Molecular biology and evolution
ISSN: 1537-1719
Titre abrégé: Mol Biol Evol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8501455
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 03 2021
09 03 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
15
9
2020
medline:
25
6
2021
entrez:
14
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
About 15,000 angiosperm species (∼6%) have separate sexes, a phenomenon known as dioecy. Why dioecious taxa are so rare is still an open question. Early work reported lower species richness in dioecious compared with nondioecious sister clades, raising the hypothesis that dioecy may be an evolutionary dead-end. This hypothesis has been recently challenged by macroevolutionary analyses that detected no or even positive effect of dioecy on diversification. However, the possible genetic consequences of dioecy at the population level, which could drive the long-term fate of dioecious lineages, have not been tested so far. Here, we used a population genomics approach in the Silene genus to look for possible effects of dioecy, especially for potential evidence of evolutionary handicaps of dioecy underlying the dead-end hypothesis. We collected individual-based RNA-seq data from several populations in 13 closely related species with different sexual systems: seven dioecious, three hermaphroditic, and three gynodioecious species. We show that dioecy is associated with increased genetic diversity, as well as higher selection efficacy both against deleterious mutations and for beneficial mutations. The results hold after controlling for phylogenetic inertia, differences in species census population sizes and geographic ranges. We conclude that dioecious Silene species neither show signs of increased mutational load nor genetic evidence for extinction risk. We discuss these observations in the light of the possible demographic differences between dioecious and self-compatible hermaphroditic species and how this could be related to alternatives to the dead-end hypothesis to explain the rarity of dioecy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32926156
pii: 5905496
doi: 10.1093/molbev/msaa229
pmc: PMC7947750
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
805-818Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution.
Références
Genome Biol Evol. 2016 Aug 29;8(8):2530-43
pubmed: 27492231
Bioinformatics. 2012 Feb 1;28(3):433-5
pubmed: 22155869
New Phytol. 2009 Aug;183(3):618-29
pubmed: 19659585
Genome Biol Evol. 2012;4(8):740-9
pubmed: 22745226
Methods Mol Biol. 2020;2090:125-146
pubmed: 31975166
Nature. 2014 Nov 13;515(7526):261-3
pubmed: 25141177
Proc Biol Sci. 1996 Apr 22;263(1369):409-14
pubmed: 18386410
Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Apr 23;281(1784):20140075
pubmed: 24759859
Mol Biol Evol. 2014 Jan;31(1):212-31
pubmed: 24129904
Am J Bot. 2014 Oct;101(10):1588-96
pubmed: 25326608
Genetics. 2000 Feb;154(2):923-9
pubmed: 10655241
Bioinformatics. 2009 Jul 15;25(14):1754-60
pubmed: 19451168
Mol Ecol. 2006 Apr;15(4):1067-81
pubmed: 16599967
Nat Genet. 2013 Jul;45(7):831-5
pubmed: 23749190
J Evol Biol. 2013 Feb;26(2):335-46
pubmed: 23206219
PLoS Biol. 2012;10(4):e1001308
pubmed: 22529744
Nat Rev Genet. 2002 Apr;3(4):274-84
pubmed: 11967552
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 May 15;88(10):4494-7
pubmed: 11607182
Curr Biol. 2018 Jun 4;28(11):1832-1838.e4
pubmed: 29804812
PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e26314
pubmed: 22039460
Genome Biol Evol. 2019 Feb 1;11(2):350-361
pubmed: 30649306
PLoS Genet. 2013;9(9):e1003754
pubmed: 24068948
Bioinformatics. 2019 Feb 1;35(3):526-528
pubmed: 30016406
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jun 5;109(23):8828-33
pubmed: 22611189
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2010 Dec;57(3):978-91
pubmed: 20723610
Am Nat. 2000 Sep;156(3):221-241
pubmed: 29587507
J Evol Biol. 2003 Sep;16(5):1006-18
pubmed: 14635916
Mol Ecol Resour. 2012 Sep;12(5):834-45
pubmed: 22540679
Ecol Lett. 2015 Jul;18(7):706-13
pubmed: 25980327
Heredity (Edinb). 2016 Mar;116(3):286-94
pubmed: 26647652
Genetics. 2007 Dec;177(4):2251-61
pubmed: 18073430
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Oct 20;112(42):13021-6
pubmed: 26438872
Science. 2010 Oct 22;330(6003):493-5
pubmed: 20966249
PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e22594
pubmed: 21949676
Mol Ecol Resour. 2014 Nov;14(6):1141-59
pubmed: 24751186
New Phytol. 2016 Feb;209(3):1290-300
pubmed: 26467174
Ecol Evol. 2013 Sep;3(10):3495-508
pubmed: 24223285
J Evol Biol. 2014 Jul;27(7):1478-90
pubmed: 24797166
Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2018 Jul;20(4):789-796
pubmed: 29521023
Genome Res. 2003 Sep;13(9):2178-89
pubmed: 12952885
Syst Biol. 2014 Jul;63(4):601-9
pubmed: 24671619
Methods Mol Biol. 2019;1910:331-369
pubmed: 31278670
Nat Methods. 2012 Mar 04;9(4):357-9
pubmed: 22388286
Mol Ecol. 2014 May;23(9):2210-27
pubmed: 24684265
Nat Plants. 2016 Nov 03;2(11):16168
pubmed: 27808231
PLoS Genet. 2013 Apr;9(4):e1003457
pubmed: 23593039
New Phytol. 2019 Nov;224(3):1252-1265
pubmed: 31617595
Evolution. 2013 Dec;67(12):3669-77
pubmed: 24299418
Evolution. 2017 Apr;71(4):898-912
pubmed: 28085192
Evolution. 2001 May;55(5):880-8
pubmed: 11430648
Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Jun 7;269(1496):1187-94
pubmed: 12061964
Bioinformatics. 2006 Nov 1;22(21):2688-90
pubmed: 16928733
Genome Res. 1999 Sep;9(9):868-77
pubmed: 10508846
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2018 Jun;123:113-122
pubmed: 29454889
Heredity (Edinb). 2009 Jul;103(1):5-14
pubmed: 19367316
Evolution. 1984 Nov;38(6):1358-1370
pubmed: 28563791
Nat Protoc. 2013 Aug;8(8):1494-512
pubmed: 23845962
Bioinformatics. 2011 Mar 15;27(6):863-4
pubmed: 21278185
Bioinformatics. 2009 Aug 15;25(16):2078-9
pubmed: 19505943
Genetics. 2017 Nov;207(3):1103-1119
pubmed: 28951530
PLoS Genet. 2016 Jan 11;12(1):e1005774
pubmed: 26752180
Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2011 Jul;13(4):667-777
pubmed: 21668608
Mol Ecol. 2017 Mar;26(5):1225-1241
pubmed: 28101895
Evolution. 2017 Jun;71(6):1519-1531
pubmed: 28384386
Syst Biol. 2007 Oct;56(5):701-10
pubmed: 17849325