Early, late, or no shunt embolization in patients with cirrhosis- and portosystemic shunt-related hepatic encephalopathy.
Embolization, Therapeutic
/ adverse effects
Female
Hepatic Encephalopathy
/ etiology
Humans
Hypertension, Portal
/ etiology
Liver Cirrhosis
/ surgery
Male
Middle Aged
Portasystemic Shunt, Surgical
/ adverse effects
Postoperative Complications
/ etiology
Recurrence
Severity of Illness Index
Survival Rate
Time Factors
Ascites
Cirrhosis
Encephalopathy
Portal hypertension
Shunt occlusion
Journal
Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology
ISSN: 0975-0711
Titre abrégé: Indian J Gastroenterol
Pays: India
ID NLM: 8409436
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2020
08 2020
Historique:
received:
12
11
2019
accepted:
17
04
2020
pubmed:
16
9
2020
medline:
16
6
2021
entrez:
15
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Portosystemic shunts (PSS) are associated with recurrent or persistent hepatic encephalopathy (HE), severe portal hypertensive (PHT) complications, and poor survival in cirrhosis patients. Shunt embolization improves HE in patients with recurrent or persistent HE. The role of early shunt embolization (ESE) in comparison with no and late SE (LSE) in cirrhosis patients with PSS and associated clinical outcomes are not studied. ESE was defined as occlusion of PSS in patients with the first episode of spontaneous HE, while LSE was that when performed in patients with recurrent/persistent PSS-related HE. We retrospectively analyzed (November 2016 to March 2019) clinical outcomes, liver disease severity, and survival between patients undergoing ESE (n = 22) vs. LSE (n = 23) and compared ESE with matched historical controls (n = 22) not undergoing shunt embolization, followed-up for 18 months. Males predominated, and the lienorenal type of shunt was the most frequent. Significantly larger and multiple shunts were noted in the LSE group. Arterial ammonia, total bilirubin, and Child-Pugh scores were significantly higher at baseline in the LSE group. Post-procedure length of stay in the intensive unit (mean 0.6 vs. 2.1 days; p = 0.04), infections (31.8% vs. 66.7% beyond 100 days; p = 0.02), recurrence of HE in first 9 months (4.5% vs. 28.6%; p = 0.03), and liver- and PHT-related clinical events beyond 10 months were significantly higher in LSE compared with those in the ESE group respectively. HE beyond 10 months was comparable between both the groups. 18.2% died in ESE while 60.87% died in the LSE group (p = 0.002). Compared with patients on only standard medical care, the occurrence of ascites, variceal bleeding, recurrence of HE, and portal vein thrombosis were significantly lower in those undergoing ESE, even though differences in survival were not significant. Our study demonstrates the benefits of ESE of large PSS in patients with cirrhosis, probably by improving survival through a reduction in liver and PHT events that warrant validation through prospective randomized controlled multicenter trials.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Portosystemic shunts (PSS) are associated with recurrent or persistent hepatic encephalopathy (HE), severe portal hypertensive (PHT) complications, and poor survival in cirrhosis patients. Shunt embolization improves HE in patients with recurrent or persistent HE. The role of early shunt embolization (ESE) in comparison with no and late SE (LSE) in cirrhosis patients with PSS and associated clinical outcomes are not studied.
METHODS
ESE was defined as occlusion of PSS in patients with the first episode of spontaneous HE, while LSE was that when performed in patients with recurrent/persistent PSS-related HE. We retrospectively analyzed (November 2016 to March 2019) clinical outcomes, liver disease severity, and survival between patients undergoing ESE (n = 22) vs. LSE (n = 23) and compared ESE with matched historical controls (n = 22) not undergoing shunt embolization, followed-up for 18 months.
RESULTS
Males predominated, and the lienorenal type of shunt was the most frequent. Significantly larger and multiple shunts were noted in the LSE group. Arterial ammonia, total bilirubin, and Child-Pugh scores were significantly higher at baseline in the LSE group. Post-procedure length of stay in the intensive unit (mean 0.6 vs. 2.1 days; p = 0.04), infections (31.8% vs. 66.7% beyond 100 days; p = 0.02), recurrence of HE in first 9 months (4.5% vs. 28.6%; p = 0.03), and liver- and PHT-related clinical events beyond 10 months were significantly higher in LSE compared with those in the ESE group respectively. HE beyond 10 months was comparable between both the groups. 18.2% died in ESE while 60.87% died in the LSE group (p = 0.002). Compared with patients on only standard medical care, the occurrence of ascites, variceal bleeding, recurrence of HE, and portal vein thrombosis were significantly lower in those undergoing ESE, even though differences in survival were not significant.
CONCLUSIONS
Our study demonstrates the benefits of ESE of large PSS in patients with cirrhosis, probably by improving survival through a reduction in liver and PHT events that warrant validation through prospective randomized controlled multicenter trials.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32929684
doi: 10.1007/s12664-020-01042-x
pii: 10.1007/s12664-020-01042-x
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM