Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with spinal cord injury: should all these patients be automatically assigned a Guy's stone score of 4?


Journal

World journal of urology
ISSN: 1433-8726
Titre abrégé: World J Urol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8307716

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2021
Historique:
received: 12 06 2020
accepted: 05 09 2020
pubmed: 16 9 2020
medline: 9 10 2021
entrez: 15 9 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To assess the complication and stone-free rates of PCNL in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) and to evaluate whether this population should be assigned a Guy's stone score (GSS) of 4. A case-control study was conducted, and electronic charts were reviewed to search for patients with SCI, bladder dysfunction, and kidney stones who had undergone PCNL. Control cases were randomly selected from among patients with complete staghorn calculus (GSS = 4). One hundred and seventeen patients were included. Patients with SCI had a significant shorter operative time (119 vs. 141 min; p = 0.018). There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of the patients' position, number of renal tracts, bleeding or transfusion rate; however, there was a significantly higher complication rate (23.1% vs. 7.8%; p = 0.009) and a longer hospital stay (5.8 vs. 3.1 days; p = 0.002) among patients with SCI. With regards to the stone-free rate in patients with different grades of GSS patients with SCI who had a GSS of 1 had a stone-free rate of 85.7%, while those with a GSS of 2, 3, or 4 had 50%, 50%, and 31.5%, respectively (p = 0.024). Only patients with a GSS of 4 in the SCI group had outcomes that were similar to those of control patients (31.5% vs. 31.6%). Patients with SCI should not be automatically assigned GSS 4. Stone-free rate is related to stone burden in these patients, although they do show a higher complication rate and a longer hospital stay than non-neurological patients.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32930845
doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03443-1
pii: 10.1007/s00345-020-03443-1
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2129-2134

Références

Scales CD Jr, Smith AC, Hanley JM, Saigal CS (2012) Urologic diseases in America P: prevalence of kidney stones in the united states. Eur Urol 62(1):160–165
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.03.052
Stamatelou KK, Francis ME, Jones CA, Nyberg LM, Curhan GC (2003) Time trends in reported prevalence of kidney stones in the united states: 1976–1994. Kidney Int 63(5):1817–1823
doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00917.x
Wang HH, Wiener JS, Ferrandino MN, Lipkin ME, Routh JC (2015) Complications of surgical management of upper tract calculi in spina bifida patients: analysis of nationwide data. J Urol 193(4):1270–1274
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.09.095
Raj GV, Bennett RT, Preminger GM, King LR, Wiener JS (1999) The incidence of nephrolithiasis in patients with spinal neural tube defects. J Urol 162(3 Pt 2):1238–1242
doi: 10.1097/00005392-199909000-00108
Turk C, Petrik A, Sarica K, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Straub M, Knoll T (2016) EAU guidelines on interventional treatment for urolithiasis. Eur Urol 69(3):475–482
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.041
Pradere B, Doizi S, Proietti S, Brachlow J, Traxer O (2018) Evaluation of guidelines for surgical management of urolithiasis. J Urol 199(5):1267–1271
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.11.111
de la Rosette J, Assimos D, Desai M, Gutierrez J, Lingeman J, Scarpa R, Tefekli A, Group CPS (2011) The clinical research office of the endourological society percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: indications, complications, and outcomes in 5803 patients. J Endourol 25(1):11–17
doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0424
Alsinnawi M, Torreggiani WC, Flynn R, McDermott TE, Grainger R, Thornhill JA (2013) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in adult patients with spina bifida, severe spinal deformity and large renal stones. Ir J Med Sci 182(3):357–361
doi: 10.1007/s11845-012-0888-4
Chaudhry R, Theisen KM, Stephany HA, Schneck FX, Cannon GM, Ost MC (2017) Percutaneous stone surgery in spina bifida patients-are stone-free rates worth the risk? J Endourol 31:S81–S86 (S1)
doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0769
Nabbout P, Slobodov G, Mellis AM, Culkin DJ (2012) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in spinal cord neuropathy patients: a single institution experience. J Endourol 26(12):1610–1613
doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0344
Rubenstein JN, Gonzalez CM, Blunt LW, Clemens JQ, Nadler RB (2004) Safety and efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with neurogenic bladder dysfunction. Urology 63(4):636–640
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2003.11.027
Symons S, Biyani CS, Bhargava S, Irvine HC, Ellingham J, Cartledge J, Lloyd SN, Joyce AD, Browning AJ (2006) Challenge of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with spinal neuropathy. Int J Urol 13(7):874–879
doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2006.01431.x
Thomas K, Smith NC, Hegarty N, Glass JM (2011) The Guy’s stone score–grading the complexity of percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedures. Urology 78(2):277–281
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.12.026
Vicentini FC, Marchini GS, Mazzucchi E, Claro JF, Srougi M (2014) Utility of the Guy’s stone score based on computed tomographic scan findings for predicting percutaneous nephrolithotomy outcomes. Urology 83(6):1248–1253
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.12.041
Vicentini FC, Serzedello FR, Thomas K, Marchini GS, Torricelli FCM, Srougi M, Mazzucchi E (2017) What is the quickest scoring system to predict percutaneous nephrolithotomy outcomes? A comparative study among S.T.O.N.E score, guy’s stone score and croes nomogram. Int Braz J Urol 43(6):1102–1109
doi: 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2016.0586
Labate G, Modi P, Timoney A, Cormio L, Zhang X, Louie M, Grabe M (2011) Rosette on behalf of the croes Pcnl study group j: the percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: classification of complications. J Endourol 25(8):1275–1280
doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0067
Kumar S, Randhawa MS, Ganesamoni R, Singh SK (2013) Tranexamic acid reduces blood loss during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective randomized controlled study. J Urol 189(5):1757–1761
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.10.115
Torricelli FCM, Monga M (2020) Staghorn renal stones: what the urologist needs to know. Int Braz J Urol 46(6):927–933. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.99.07
doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.99.07 pubmed: 32213203 pmcid: 7527092
de Souza Melo PA, Vicentini FC, Beraldi AA, Hisano M, Murta CB, de Almeida Claro JF (2018) Outcomes of more than 1 000 percutaneous nephrolithotomies and validation of Guy’s stone score. BJU Int 121(4):640–646
doi: 10.1111/bju.14129

Auteurs

Fabio C M Torricelli (FCM)

Division of Urology, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Av. Vereador Jose Diniz, 3300, conj. 208, Sao Paulo, SP, 04604-006, Brazil. fctorricelli@yahoo.com.br.

Fabio C Vicentini (FC)

Division of Urology, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Av. Vereador Jose Diniz, 3300, conj. 208, Sao Paulo, SP, 04604-006, Brazil.
Division of Urology, Hospital Brigadeiro, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Lucas Zanetti (L)

Faculdade das Américas School of Medicine, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Rodrigo Perrella (R)

Division of Urology, Hospital Brigadeiro, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Giovanni S Marchini (GS)

Division of Urology, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Av. Vereador Jose Diniz, 3300, conj. 208, Sao Paulo, SP, 04604-006, Brazil.

Alexandre Danilovic (A)

Division of Urology, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Av. Vereador Jose Diniz, 3300, conj. 208, Sao Paulo, SP, 04604-006, Brazil.

Carlos A Batagello (CA)

Division of Urology, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Av. Vereador Jose Diniz, 3300, conj. 208, Sao Paulo, SP, 04604-006, Brazil.

Claudio B Murta (CB)

Division of Urology, Hospital Brigadeiro, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Joaquim F A Claro (JFA)

Division of Urology, Hospital Brigadeiro, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Miguel Srougi (M)

Division of Urology, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Av. Vereador Jose Diniz, 3300, conj. 208, Sao Paulo, SP, 04604-006, Brazil.

William C Nahas (WC)

Division of Urology, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Av. Vereador Jose Diniz, 3300, conj. 208, Sao Paulo, SP, 04604-006, Brazil.

Eduardo Mazzucchi (E)

Division of Urology, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Av. Vereador Jose Diniz, 3300, conj. 208, Sao Paulo, SP, 04604-006, Brazil.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH