Incorporation of a computer-aided vessel-suppression system to detect lung nodules in CT images: effect on sensitivity and reading time in routine clinical settings.
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Female
Humans
Lung
/ blood supply
Lung Neoplasms
/ diagnostic imaging
Male
Middle Aged
Multiple Pulmonary Nodules
/ diagnostic imaging
Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
Sensitivity and Specificity
Software
Solitary Pulmonary Nodule
/ diagnostic imaging
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
/ methods
Young Adult
Computer software
Lung
Radiologists
Tomography
Workflow
Journal
Japanese journal of radiology
ISSN: 1867-108X
Titre abrégé: Jpn J Radiol
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 101490689
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2021
Feb 2021
Historique:
received:
30
07
2020
accepted:
10
09
2020
pubmed:
18
9
2020
medline:
1
6
2021
entrez:
17
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To evaluate whether a computer-aided vessel-suppression system improves lung nodule detection in routine clinical settings. We used computer software that automatically suppresses pulmonary vessels on chest CT while preserving pulmonary nodules. Sixty-one chest CT images were included in our study. Three radiologists independently read either standard CT images alone or both computer-aided CT and standard CT images randomly to detect a pulmonary nodule ≥ 4 mm in diameter. After an interval of at least 15 days to avoid recall bias, the three radiologists interpreted the counterpart images of the same patients. The reference standard was decided by an expert panel. The primary endpoint was sensitivity. The secondary endpoint was interpretation time. The average sensitivity improved with computer-aided CT (72% for standard CT vs. 84% for computer-aided CT, p = 0.02). There was no difference in the false-positive rate (21% for both standard CT and computer-aided CT, p = 0.98). Although the average reading time was 9.5% longer for computer-aided plus standard CT compared with standard CT alone, the difference was not significant (p = 0.11). Vessel-suppressed CT images helped radiologists to improve the sensitivity of pulmonary nodule detection without compromising the false-positive rate.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32940850
doi: 10.1007/s11604-020-01043-y
pii: 10.1007/s11604-020-01043-y
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
159-164Références
The national lung screening trial research team. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:395–409.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1102873
Hirose T, Nitta N, Shiraishi J, Nagatani Y, Takahashi M, Murata K. Evaluation of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) software for the detection of lung nodules on multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT): JAFROC study for the improvement in radiologists' diagnostic accuracy. Acad Radiol. 2008;15:1505–12.
doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2008.06.009
Kozuka T, Matsukubo Y, Kadoba T, Oda T, Suzuki A, Hyodo T, et al. Efficiency of a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system with deep learning in detection of pulmonary nodules on 1-mm-thick images of computed tomography. Jpn J Radiol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-020-01009-0 .
doi: 10.1007/s11604-020-01009-0
pubmed: 32592003
Lo SB, Freedman MT, Gillis LB, White CS, Mun SK. Journal club: Computer-aided detection of lung nodules on CT with a computerized pulmonary vessel suppressed function. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018;210:480–8.
doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.18718
Wagner AK, Hapich A, Psychogios MN, Teichgraber U, Malich A, Papageorgiou I. Computer-aided detection of pulmonary nodules in computed tomography using ClearReadCT. J Med Syst. 2019;43:58.
doi: 10.1007/s10916-019-1180-1
Matsumoto S, Ohno Y, Aoki T, Yamagata H, Nogami M, Matsumoto K, Yamashita Y, Sugimura K. Computer-aided detection of lung nodules on multidetector CT in concurrent-reader and second-reader modes: a comparative study. Eur J Radiol. 2013;82:1332–7.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.02.005
Foti G, Faccioli N, D'Onofrio M, Contro A, Milazzo T, Pozzi MR. Evaluation of a method of computer-aided detection (CAD) of pulmonary nodules with computed tomography. Radiol Med. 2010;115:950–61.
doi: 10.1007/s11547-010-0556-6
MacMahon H, Austin JH, Gamsu G, Herold CJ, Jett JR, Naidich DP, et al. Guidelines for management of small pulmonary nodules detected on CT scans: a statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology. 2005;237:395–400.
doi: 10.1148/radiol.2372041887
Fleiss JL, Tytun A, Ury HK. A simple approximation for calculating sample sizes for comparing independent proportions. Biometrics. 1980;36:343–6.
doi: 10.2307/2529990
Hosny A, Parmar C, Quackenbush J, Schwartz LH, Aerts HJWL. Artificial intelligence in radiology. Nat Rev Cancer. 2018;18:500–10.
doi: 10.1038/s41568-018-0016-5
Mayo RC, Leung J. Artificial intelligence and deep learning—radiology’s next frontier? Clin Imaging. 2018;49:87–8.
doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2017.11.007
Matsumoto M, Koike S, Kashima S, Awai K. Geographic distribution of CT, MRI and PET devices in Japan: a longitudinal analysis based on national census data. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(5):e0126036.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126036
Scholten ET, Horeweg N, de Koning HJ, Vliegenthart R, Oudkerk M, Mali WP, et al. Computed tomographic characteristics of interval and post screen carcinomas in lung cancer screening. Eur Radiol. 2015;25:81–8.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3394-4
Cai J, Xu D, Liu S, Cham MD. The added value of computer-aided detection of small pulmonary nodules and missed lung cancers. J Thorac Imaging. 2018;33:390–5.
doi: 10.1097/RTI.0000000000000362
Beyer F, Zierott L, Fallenberg EM, Juergens KU, Stoeckel J, Heindel W, et al. Comparison of sensitivity and reading time for the use of computer-aided detection (CAD) of pulmonary nodules at MDCT as concurrent or second reader. Eur Radiol. 2007;17:2941.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-007-0667-1