A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 24-week, phase II, proof-of-concept study of romilkimab (SAR156597) in early diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis.
Adult
Aged
Antibodies, Bispecific
/ therapeutic use
Double-Blind Method
Female
Humans
Immunosuppressive Agents
/ therapeutic use
Interleukin-13
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Interleukin-4
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Male
Middle Aged
Proof of Concept Study
Scleroderma, Diffuse
/ drug therapy
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
autoimmune diseases
chemokines
scleroderma
systemic
therapeutics
Journal
Annals of the rheumatic diseases
ISSN: 1468-2060
Titre abrégé: Ann Rheum Dis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0372355
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2020
12 2020
Historique:
received:
26
06
2020
revised:
10
08
2020
accepted:
11
08
2020
pubmed:
24
9
2020
medline:
15
12
2020
entrez:
23
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Recent advances in systemic sclerosis (SSc) show that it involves a T-helper type-2-oriented immune response with interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13. Romilkimab is an engineered, humanised, bispecific immunoglobulin-G4 antibody that binds and neutralises IL-4/IL-13 making it ideal for exploration in fibrosis. Patients aged ≥18 years diagnosed with diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSc), and with or without immunosuppressive background therapy, were randomised (1:1) to subcutaneous romilkimab 200 mg or placebo one time per week for 24 weeks in this double-blind, proof-of-concept, phase II study. The primary endpoint was change in modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) from baseline to week 24. Ninety-seven patients were randomised to romilkimab (n=48) or placebo (n=49) for 24 weeks. Least-squares mean (SE) change in mRSS was -4.76 (0.86) for romilkimab versus -2.45 (0.85) for placebo yielding a mean (SE) (90% CI) difference of -2.31 (1.21) (-4.32 to -0.31; p=0.0291, one-sided). Treatment-emergent AEs were balanced between placebo (n=41; 84%) and romilkimab (n=40; 80%). Most were mild-to-moderate and discontinuations were low (three overall). There were two deaths (one scleroderma renal crisis (romilkimab) and one cardiomyopathy (placebo)), neither were considered treatment related. Two patients in the placebo group had a cardiovascular treatment-emergent SAE (one cardiac failure, one cardiomyopathy), but there were no cardiac safety signals with romilkimab. This study demonstrated significant effects on skin changes with romilkimab in early dcSSc that require confirmation with a longer and more comprehensive phase III study to determine clinical relevance. NCT02921971.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32963047
pii: annrheumdis-2020-218447
doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-218447
pmc: PMC7677494
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Bispecific
0
IL13 protein, human
0
IL4 protein, human
0
Immunosuppressive Agents
0
Interleukin-13
0
Interleukin-4
207137-56-2
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02921971']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1600-1607Subventions
Organisme : NIAMS NIH HHS
ID : K24 AR063120
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: YA reports personal fees from Actelion, Bayer, BMS and Curzion, and grants and personal fees from Inventiva, Roche and Sanofi. CPD reports personal fees from Actelion, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Corbus, Roche, Sanofi, and grants and personal fees from CSL Behring, GlaxoSmithKline and Inventiva. DK reports personal fees from Acceleron, Actelion, Blade Therapeutics, Eicos Sciences, Inc, Galapagos, GlaxoSmithKline, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Sanofi-Aventis/Genzyme and UCB Pharma, and grants and personal fees from Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb and Genentech/Roche; he is funded by the NIH/NIAMS K24 AR063120. PW, CS, CE, FM, RB and AL are employees of Sanofi. CS is a shareholder in Sanofi.
Références
Arthritis Rheum. 1997 Nov;40(11):1984-91
pubmed: 9365087
JAMA. 2014 Jun 25;311(24):2490-8
pubmed: 25058083
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2015 Apr 23;1:15002
pubmed: 27189141
Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Sep 15;61(9):1257-63
pubmed: 19714600
Eur Respir J. 2018 Dec 13;52(6):
pubmed: 30337444
J Invest Dermatol. 2001 Jan;116(1):136-43
pubmed: 11168809
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2018 Feb 1;57(2):370-381
pubmed: 29207002
Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Aug;60(8):2490-8
pubmed: 19644851
Ann Rheum Dis. 2013 Nov;72(11):1747-55
pubmed: 24092682
Lancet. 2016 Jun 25;387(10038):2630-2640
pubmed: 27156934
J Immunol. 2003 Sep 1;171(5):2684-93
pubmed: 12928422
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jan 4;378(1):35-47
pubmed: 29298160
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2003 Oct;285(4):L907-14
pubmed: 12871855
J Rheumatol. 1988 Feb;15(2):202-5
pubmed: 3361530
Inflamm Res. 2015 Apr;64(3-4):151-9
pubmed: 25725697
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019 Sep;71(9):1553-1570
pubmed: 30969034
Qual Life Res. 2011 Dec;20(10):1727-36
pubmed: 21479777
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2016 Feb;68(2):167-78
pubmed: 26806474
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2019;1132:79-87
pubmed: 31037627
Nat Rev Immunol. 2018 Jan;18(1):62-76
pubmed: 28853443
J Scleroderma Relat Disord. 2017 Jan-Apr;2(1):11-18
pubmed: 28516167
Autoimmun Rev. 2020 May;19(5):102507
pubmed: 32194200
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jun 27;380(26):2518-2528
pubmed: 31112379
Ann Rheum Dis. 2006 Oct;65(10):1325-9
pubmed: 16540546
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020 Jan;72(1):125-136
pubmed: 31342624
Arthritis Res Ther. 2019 Jan 16;21(1):23
pubmed: 30651141
J Rheumatol. 2009 Apr;36(4):768-72
pubmed: 19228662