Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS): a Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) in Bariatric Surgery.
Bariatric surgery
ERAS
Enhanced recovery aftersurgery
Meta-analysis
Metabolic surgery
Randomised controlled trials
Sleeve gastrectomy
Systematic review
gastric bypass
Journal
Obesity surgery
ISSN: 1708-0428
Titre abrégé: Obes Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9106714
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2020
Dec 2020
Historique:
received:
31
05
2020
accepted:
21
09
2020
revised:
06
09
2020
pubmed:
28
9
2020
medline:
15
4
2021
entrez:
27
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Our aim was to conduct an up-to-date systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to determine the benefits and harms of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programme in bariatric surgery. MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library were searched for RCTs on ERAS versus standard care (SC) until April 2020. The primary endpoint was the length of hospital stay (LOS). Five RCTs included a total of 610 procedures. ERAS adoption is capable of significantly reducing LOS (MD of - 0.51; 95% CI - 0.92 to - 0.10; P = 0.01) and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) (OR 0.42; 95% CI 0.19 to 0.95; P = 0.04). No significant differences in terms of adverse events and readmissions. The implementation of ERAS in bariatric surgery produces a significant reduction in LOS and PONV.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32981000
doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-05000-6
pii: 10.1007/s11695-020-05000-6
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
5071-5085Références
Colquitt JL, Pickett K, Loveman E, et al. Surgery for weight loss in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;8(8):CD003641.
Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, et al. IFSO worldwide survey 2016: primary, endoluminal, and revisional procedures. Obes Surg. 2018;28(12):3783–94.
doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3450-2
Cardoso L, Rodrigues D, Gomes L, et al. Short- and long-term mortality after bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017;19(9):1223–32.
pubmed: 28244626
doi: 10.1111/dom.12922
Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery C, Flum DR, Belle SH, et al. Perioperative safety in the longitudinal assessment of bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(5):445–54.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0901836
Aminian A, Brethauer SA, Kirwan JP, et al. How safe is metabolic/diabetes surgery? Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015;17(2):198–201.
pubmed: 25352176
doi: 10.1111/dom.12405
Ljungqvist O, Scott M, Fearon KC. Enhanced recovery after surgery: a review. JAMA surgery. 2017;152(3):292–8.
pubmed: 28097305
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4952
Thorell A, MacCormick AD, Awad S, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in bariatric surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) society recommendations. World J Surg. 2016;40(9):2065–83.
pubmed: 26943657
doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3492-3
Mannaerts GH, van Mil SR, Stepaniak PS, et al. Results of implementing an enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery (ERABS) protocol. Obes Surg. 2016;26(2):303–12.
pubmed: 26003552
doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1742-3
Barreca M, Renzi C, Tankel J, et al. Is there a role for enhanced recovery after laparoscopic bariatric surgery? Preliminary results from a specialist obesity treatment center. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12(1):119–26.
pubmed: 25892343
doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2015.03.008
Meunier H, Le Roux Y, Fiant AL, et al. Does the implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) guidelines improve outcomes of bariatric surgery? A propensity score analysis in 464 patients. Obes Surg. 2019;29(9):2843–53.
pubmed: 31183785
doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-03943-z
Brethauer SA, Grieco A, Fraker T, et al. Employing enhanced recovery goals in bariatric surgery (ENERGY): a national quality improvement project using the metabolic and bariatric surgery accreditation and quality improvement program. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019;15(11):1977–89.
pubmed: 31640906
doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.08.024
Singh PM, Panwar R, Borle A, et al. Efficiency and safety effects of applying ERAS protocols to bariatric surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of evidence. Obes Surg. 2017;27(2):489–501.
pubmed: 27878754
doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2442-3
Malczak P, Pisarska M, Piotr M, et al. Enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2017;27(1):226–35.
pubmed: 27817086
doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2438-z
Ahmed OS, Rogers AC, Bolger JC, et al. Meta-analysis of enhanced recovery protocols in bariatric surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 2018;22(6):964–72.
pubmed: 29488124
doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-3709-x
Lemanu DP, Singh PP, Berridge K, et al. Randomized clinical trial of enhanced recovery versus standard care after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Br J Surg. 2013;100(4):482–9.
pubmed: 23339040
doi: 10.1002/bjs.9026
Pimenta GP, Capellan DA, de Aguilar-Nascimento JE. Sleeve gastrectomy with or without a multimodal perioperative care. A randomized pilot study. Obes Surg. 2015;25(9):1639–46.
pubmed: 25670530
doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1573-2
Geubbels N, Evren I, Acherman YIZ, et al. Randomized clinical trial of an enhanced recovery after surgery programme versus conventional care in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. BJS open. 2019;3(3):274–81.
pubmed: 31183442
pmcid: 6551390
doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50143
Ruiz-Tovar J, Garcia A, Ferrigni C, et al. Impact of implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019;15(2):228–35.
pubmed: 30606469
doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2018.11.002
Prabhakaran S, Misra S, Magila M, Kumar SS, Kasthuri S, Palanivelu C, Raj PP. Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Outcomes of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery and Standard Recovery Pathways in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2020;30(9):3273-3279
Higgins JPT TJ, Chandler J, Cumpston M, et al. (editors). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 60 (updated July 2019) Cochrane, 2019.Available from www.training.cochrane.org/handbook .
Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000100.
pubmed: 19621070
pmcid: 2707010
doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100
Bhandari M, Fobi MAL, Buchwald JN, Bariatric metabolic surgery standardization working G. Standardization of bariatric metabolic procedures: world consensus meeting statement. Obes Surg 2019;29(Suppl 4):309–345.
Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250(2):187–96.
pubmed: 19638912
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2
Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials. 1996;17(1):1–12.
pubmed: 8721797
doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4
Balasubramanian SP, Wiener M, Alshameeri Z, et al. Standards of reporting of randomized controlled trials in general surgery: can we do better? Ann Surg. 2006;244(5):663–7.
pubmed: 17060756
pmcid: 1856614
doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000217640.11224.05
Mantel N, Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1959;22(4):719–48.
pubmed: 13655060
Greenland S, Robins JM. Estimation of a common effect parameter from sparse follow-up data. Biometrics. 1985;41(1):55–68.
pubmed: 4005387
doi: 10.2307/2530643
Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005;5:13.
pubmed: 15840177
pmcid: 1097734
doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-5-13
Wan X, Wang W, Liu J, et al. Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14:135.
pubmed: 25524443
pmcid: 4383202
doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-135
Friedman HP, Goldberg JD. Meta-analysis: an introduction and point of view. Hepatology. 1996;23(4):917–28.
pubmed: 8666350
doi: 10.1002/hep.510230437
Day RW, Fielder S, Calhoun J, et al. Incomplete reporting of enhanced recovery elements and its impact on achieving quality improvement. Br J Surg. 2015;102(13):1594–602.
pubmed: 26364714
pmcid: 4838394
doi: 10.1002/bjs.9918
Neville A, Lee L, Antonescu I, et al. Systematic review of outcomes used to evaluate enhanced recovery after surgery. Br J Surg. 2014;101(3):159–70.
pubmed: 24469616
doi: 10.1002/bjs.9324
Greco M, Capretti G, Beretta L, et al. Enhanced recovery program in colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Surg. 2014;38(6):1531–41.
pubmed: 24368573
doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2416-8
Zhuang CL, Ye XZ, Zhang XD, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery programs versus traditional care for colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56(5):667–78.
pubmed: 23575408
doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182812842
Aman MW, Stem M, Schweitzer MA, et al. Early hospital readmission after bariatric surgery. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(6):2231–8.
pubmed: 26482158
doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4483-4
Berger ER, Huffman KM, Fraker T, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for bariatric surgery readmissions: findings from 130,007 admissions in the metabolic and bariatric surgery accreditation and quality improvement program. Ann Surg. 2018;267(1):122–31.
pubmed: 27849660
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002079
Groene P, Eisenlohr J, Zeuzem C, Dudok S, Karcz K, Hofmann-Kiefer K. Postoperative nausea and vomiting in bariatric surgery in comparison to non-bariatric gastric surgery. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2019;14(1):90-95
Suh S, Helm M, Kindel TL, Goldblatt MI, Gould JC, Higgins RM. The impact of nausea on post-operative outcomes in bariatric surgery patients. Surg Endosc. 2020;34(7):3085-3091
Major P, Wysocki M, Torbicz G, et al. Risk factors for prolonged length of hospital stay and readmissions after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2018;28(2):323–32.
pubmed: 28762024
doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2844-x
Gustafsson UO, Oppelstrup H, Thorell A, et al. Adherence to the ERAS protocol is associated with 5-year survival after colorectal cancer surgery: a retrospective cohort study. World J Surg. 2016;40(7):1741–7.
pubmed: 26913728
doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3460-y
Malczak P, Wysocki M, Twardowska H, et al. Impact of adherence to the ERAS(R) protocol on short-term outcomes after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2020;30(4):1498–505.
pubmed: 31901126
doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-04349-7
Rubino F, Shukla A, Pomp A, et al. Bariatric, metabolic, and diabetes surgery: what’s in a name? Ann Surg. 2014;259(1):117–22.
pubmed: 23314274
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182759656
Myles PS, Weitkamp B, Jones K, et al. Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-40. Br J Anaesth. 2000;84(1):11–5.
pubmed: 10740540
doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bja.a013366