Comprehensive polyphenolic profiling in promising resistant grapevine hybrids including 17 novel breeds in northern Italy.
UHPLC-MS/MS
Vitis
grapes
polyphenols
resistant varieties
targeted metabolomics
Journal
Journal of the science of food and agriculture
ISSN: 1097-0010
Titre abrégé: J Sci Food Agric
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0376334
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2021
Apr 2021
Historique:
revised:
17
09
2020
received:
21
04
2020
accepted:
04
10
2020
pubmed:
5
10
2020
medline:
28
4
2021
entrez:
4
10
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
A promising way to overcome the susceptibility of Vitis vinifera L. to fungal diseases is the integration of genetic resistance by the interspecific crossing between V. vinifera varieties and resistant species. However, the products of such hybrids are still not accepted by customers, particularly due to their organoleptic characteristics, not least influenced by their polyphenolic profile. A total of 58 resistant breeding lines, 41 from international programs and 17 new progeny individuals, were grown in one untreated vineyard to exclude any variances by climatic and pedologic conditions or vineyard practice. A total of 60 polyphenols (including acids, anthocyanins, flavonols, flavan-3-ols, and stilbenoids) were determined in grapevine berries by ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry in two consecutive years. The overall profiles were rather consistent (variation P > 0.05) within the two harvests, with the exceptions of epicatechin and caftaric acid. Anthocyanin diglucosides were found in ten of the red breeding lines, malvidin-3,5-O-diglucoside being predominant in nine of them. Total polyphenol content of the unknown progeny individuals and international breeding lines was comparable, with the exception of significantly increased amounts of gallic acid and some flavonoids. The comprehensive study reported herein of the polyphenolic profile of hybrids from international breeding programs, but also of new breeds from private initiatives, all cultivated in the same vineyard, will support the selection of promising candidates for further breeding programs to overcome impairment due to undesired sensory characteristics of new highly resistant varieties.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
A promising way to overcome the susceptibility of Vitis vinifera L. to fungal diseases is the integration of genetic resistance by the interspecific crossing between V. vinifera varieties and resistant species. However, the products of such hybrids are still not accepted by customers, particularly due to their organoleptic characteristics, not least influenced by their polyphenolic profile.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 58 resistant breeding lines, 41 from international programs and 17 new progeny individuals, were grown in one untreated vineyard to exclude any variances by climatic and pedologic conditions or vineyard practice. A total of 60 polyphenols (including acids, anthocyanins, flavonols, flavan-3-ols, and stilbenoids) were determined in grapevine berries by ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry in two consecutive years. The overall profiles were rather consistent (variation P > 0.05) within the two harvests, with the exceptions of epicatechin and caftaric acid. Anthocyanin diglucosides were found in ten of the red breeding lines, malvidin-3,5-O-diglucoside being predominant in nine of them. Total polyphenol content of the unknown progeny individuals and international breeding lines was comparable, with the exception of significantly increased amounts of gallic acid and some flavonoids.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The comprehensive study reported herein of the polyphenolic profile of hybrids from international breeding programs, but also of new breeds from private initiatives, all cultivated in the same vineyard, will support the selection of promising candidates for further breeding programs to overcome impairment due to undesired sensory characteristics of new highly resistant varieties.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33011987
doi: 10.1002/jsfa.10861
pmc: PMC8048854
doi:
Substances chimiques
Polyphenols
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2380-2388Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors. Journal of The Science of Food and Agriculture published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.
Références
Food Sci Biotechnol. 2019 May 27;28(6):1607-1615
pubmed: 31807333
Molecules. 2015 Oct 02;20(10):18095-106
pubmed: 26445038
Food Res Int. 2017 Aug;98:10-19
pubmed: 28610726
Anal Chim Acta. 2012 Jun 30;732:145-52
pubmed: 22688046
J Agric Food Chem. 2015 Aug 5;63(30):6823-34
pubmed: 26158394
J Agric Food Chem. 2012 Oct 24;60(42):10461-71
pubmed: 23033811
Food Funct. 2019 Feb 20;10(2):514-528
pubmed: 30746536
J Mass Spectrom. 2014 Sep;49(9):860-9
pubmed: 25230183
Food Nutr Res. 2017 Aug 13;61(1):1361779
pubmed: 28970777
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Mar 1;108(9):3530-5
pubmed: 21245334
Int J Mol Sci. 2013 Sep 27;14(10):19651-69
pubmed: 24084717
Mol Aspects Med. 2018 Jun;61:63-75
pubmed: 29427606
J Agric Food Chem. 2007 Feb 7;55(3):992-1002
pubmed: 17263504
J Agric Food Chem. 2012 Sep 12;60(36):8831-40
pubmed: 22468648
J Sci Food Agric. 2017 Jan;97(1):236-243
pubmed: 26992139
Food Chem. 2011 Dec 1;129(3):940-50
pubmed: 25212322
Hortic Res. 2015 May 20;2:15020
pubmed: 26504571
J Exp Bot. 2019 Jan 7;70(2):397-423
pubmed: 30388247
Phytochem Rev. 2010 Sep;9(3):357-378
pubmed: 20835385
Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2015;2015:340520
pubmed: 26180583
Food Chem. 2014 Jul 1;154:187-98
pubmed: 24518332
Curr Pharm Des. 2018;24(2):106-122
pubmed: 29141541
J Agric Food Chem. 2006 Oct 4;54(20):7692-702
pubmed: 17002441
Int J Mol Sci. 2013 Sep 11;14(9):18711-39
pubmed: 24030720
Int J Mol Sci. 2010 May 21;11(5):2212-28
pubmed: 20559511
Int J Mol Sci. 2012;13(3):3492-510
pubmed: 22489164
Front Plant Sci. 2019 Nov 08;10:1062
pubmed: 31798597
Food Res Int. 2017 Aug;98:20-33
pubmed: 28610729
Front Nutr. 2018 Sep 21;5:87
pubmed: 30298133