Taxonomic profiling of individual nematodes isolated from copse soils using deep amplicon sequencing of four distinct regions of the 18S ribosomal RNA gene.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
05
08
2020
accepted:
24
09
2020
entrez:
7
10
2020
pubmed:
8
10
2020
medline:
15
12
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Nematodes are representative soil metazoans with diverged species that play crucial roles in nutrient recycling in the pedosphere. Qualitative and quantitative information on nematode communities is useful for assessing soil quality, and DNA barcode-mediated taxonomic analysis is a powerful tool to investigate taxonomic compositions and changes in nematode communities. Here, we investigated four regions (regions 1-4) of the 18S small subunit ribosomal RNA (SSU) gene as PCR targets of deep amplicon sequencing for the taxonomic profiling of individual soil nematodes. We determined the sequence variants (SVs) of 4 SSU regions for 96 nematodes (total 384 amplicons) isolated from copse soils and assigned their taxonomy using the QIIME2 software with dada2 or deblur algorithm and the SILVA database. Dada2 detected approximately 2-fold more nematode-derived SVs than deblur, and a larger number of SVs were obtained in regions 1 and 4 than those in other regions. These results and sufficient reference sequence coverage in region 4 indicated that DNA barcoding using a primer set for region 4 followed by dada2-based analysis would be most suitable for soil nematode taxonomic analysis. Eighteen SSU-derived operational taxonomic units (rOTUs) were obtained from 68 isolates, and their orders were determined based on the phylogenetic trees built by four regional sequences of rOTUs and 116 nematode reference species as well as the BLASTN search. The majority of the isolates were derived from three major orders Dorylaimida (6 rOTUs, 51.5% in 68 isolates), Rhabditida (4 rOTUs, 29.4%), and Triplonchida (7 rOTUs, 17.6%). The predicted feeding types of the isolates were fungivores (38.2% in total nematodes), plant feeders (32.4%), and 14.7% for both bacterivores and omnivores/predators. Additionally, we attempted to improve the branch structure of phylogenetic trees by using long nucleotide sequences artificially prepared by connecting regional sequences, but the effect was limited.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33027282
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240336
pii: PONE-D-20-24257
pmc: PMC7540906
doi:
Substances chimiques
DNA, Protozoan
0
DNA, Ribosomal
0
RNA, Ribosomal, 18S
0
Soil
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0240336Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Ecol Evol. 2019 Jan 22;9(3):1211-1226
pubmed: 30805154
Mol Ecol Resour. 2009 Nov;9(6):1439-50
pubmed: 21564930
PLoS One. 2013 Apr 22;8(4):e61217
pubmed: 23630581
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2005 Oct 29;360(1462):1935-43
pubmed: 16214751
Mol Ecol. 2012 Apr;21(8):1931-50
pubmed: 22171763
J Nematol. 2019;51:1-17
pubmed: 31088023
Sci Rep. 2017 Jun 8;7(1):3028
pubmed: 28596521
Trends Ecol Evol. 2014 Oct;29(10):566-71
pubmed: 25175416
Sci Rep. 2018 Jan 31;8(1):2004
pubmed: 29386563
BMC Ecol. 2015 Feb 12;15:3
pubmed: 25880249
Nature. 1998 Mar 5;392(6671):71-5
pubmed: 9510248
PLoS One. 2010 Oct 28;5(10):e13716
pubmed: 21060838
mSystems. 2017 Mar 7;2(2):
pubmed: 28289731
Sci Data. 2020 Mar 26;7(1):103
pubmed: 32218461
Trends Ecol Evol. 2009 Feb;24(2):110-7
pubmed: 19100655
Bioinformatics. 2007 Nov 1;23(21):2947-8
pubmed: 17846036
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2005 Oct;62(2):278-89
pubmed: 15919114
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 07;9(2):e87624
pubmed: 24516555
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 17;15(3):e0230153
pubmed: 32182269
PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e51785
pubmed: 23284767
Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2010;48:371-94
pubmed: 20455699
J Microbiol Methods. 2017 Jul;138:37-49
pubmed: 27262374
Nat Methods. 2016 Jul;13(7):581-3
pubmed: 27214047
Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Jan;41(Database issue):D590-6
pubmed: 23193283
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 02;10(12):e0143559
pubmed: 26630572
J Nematol. 1993 Sep;25(3):315-31
pubmed: 19279775
Environ Pollut. 2016 Jun;213:184-194
pubmed: 26895540
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 06;8(12):e82468
pubmed: 24324794
J Nematol. 1990 Jan;22(1):1-7
pubmed: 19287681
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 23;10(12):e0144928
pubmed: 26701112
R Soc Open Sci. 2017 Aug 16;4(8):170315
pubmed: 28878981
Nature. 2019 Aug;572(7768):194-198
pubmed: 31341281
Nat Methods. 2010 May;7(5):335-6
pubmed: 20383131
Ecol Evol. 2020 Feb 15;10(6):2885-2899
pubmed: 32211163
Mol Biol Evol. 2006 Sep;23(9):1792-800
pubmed: 16790472
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 22;9(4):e95567
pubmed: 24755918