Favipiravir at high doses has potent antiviral activity in SARS-CoV-2-infected hamsters, whereas hydroxychloroquine lacks activity.
Amides
/ pharmacokinetics
Animals
Antiviral Agents
/ therapeutic use
Betacoronavirus
/ drug effects
Chlorocebus aethiops
Coronavirus Infections
/ drug therapy
Cricetinae
Disease Models, Animal
Disease Transmission, Infectious
/ prevention & control
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Drug Evaluation, Preclinical
Female
Hydroxychloroquine
/ pharmacokinetics
Lung
/ drug effects
Pyrazines
/ pharmacokinetics
SARS-CoV-2
Treatment Outcome
Vero Cells
Viral Load
/ drug effects
COVID-19 Drug Treatment
SARS-CoV-2
antiviral therapy
favipiravir
hydroxychloroquine
preclinical model
Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
ISSN: 1091-6490
Titre abrégé: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7505876
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 10 2020
27 10 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
11
10
2020
medline:
11
11
2020
entrez:
10
10
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) rapidly spread around the globe after its emergence in Wuhan in December 2019. With no specific therapeutic and prophylactic options available, the virus has infected millions of people of which more than half a million succumbed to the viral disease, COVID-19. The urgent need for an effective treatment together with a lack of small animal infection models has led to clinical trials using repurposed drugs without preclinical evidence of their in vivo efficacy. We established an infection model in Syrian hamsters to evaluate the efficacy of small molecules on both infection and transmission. Treatment of SARS-CoV-2-infected hamsters with a low dose of favipiravir or hydroxychloroquine with(out) azithromycin resulted in, respectively, a mild or no reduction in virus levels. However, high doses of favipiravir significantly reduced infectious virus titers in the lungs and markedly improved lung histopathology. Moreover, a high dose of favipiravir decreased virus transmission by direct contact, whereas hydroxychloroquine failed as prophylaxis. Pharmacokinetic modeling of hydroxychloroquine suggested that the total lung exposure to the drug did not cause the failure. Our data on hydroxychloroquine (together with previous reports in macaques and ferrets) thus provide no scientific basis for the use of this drug in COVID-19 patients. In contrast, the results with favipiravir demonstrate that an antiviral drug at nontoxic doses exhibits a marked protective effect against SARS-CoV-2 in a small animal model. Clinical studies are required to assess whether a similar antiviral effect is achievable in humans without toxic effects.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33037151
pii: 2014441117
doi: 10.1073/pnas.2014441117
pmc: PMC7604414
doi:
Substances chimiques
Amides
0
Antiviral Agents
0
Pyrazines
0
Hydroxychloroquine
4QWG6N8QKH
favipiravir
EW5GL2X7E0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
26955-26965Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no competing interest.
Références
N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 20;382(8):727-733
pubmed: 31978945
Bioinformatics. 2016 Jan 15;32(2):292-4
pubmed: 26428292
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013 Feb 04;368(1614):20120205
pubmed: 23382427
Nature. 2020 Jul;583(7818):834-838
pubmed: 32408338
Science. 2020 May 29;368(6494):1016-1020
pubmed: 32269068
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014 Aug;58(8):4875-84
pubmed: 24841269
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004 Oct 8;323(1):264-8
pubmed: 15351731
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Oct 23;71(7):e191-e194
pubmed: 32124919
Cell. 2020 Jun 11;181(6):1436-1441
pubmed: 32531248
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017 Feb 23;11(2):e0005389
pubmed: 28231247
Antiviral Res. 2018 May;153:85-94
pubmed: 29524445
Antiviral Res. 2020 Jun;178:104786
pubmed: 32251767
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020 Jun 23;64(7):
pubmed: 32366720
Sci Rep. 2019 Nov 26;9(1):17598
pubmed: 31772203
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 9;15(7):e0235458
pubmed: 32645044
Cell Res. 2020 Mar;30(3):269-271
pubmed: 32020029
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Aug;108(2):242-247
pubmed: 32246834
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Jul 28;71(15):732-739
pubmed: 32150618
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2020 Apr;9(3):209-214
pubmed: 32363880
Euro Surveill. 2020 Mar;25(9):
pubmed: 32156327
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016 Dec 27;61(1):
pubmed: 27736754
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1988 Sep;26(3):303-13
pubmed: 3179169
Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Sep;13(5):880-885
pubmed: 32475019
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009 Jan;53(1):202-9
pubmed: 18955536
mBio. 2020 May 22;11(3):
pubmed: 32444382
Br J Pharmacol. 2020 Nov;177(21):4995-4996
pubmed: 32424836
Chirality. 1995;7(8):598-604
pubmed: 8593253
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Dec 3;71(9):2428-2446
pubmed: 32215622
N Engl J Med. 2020 Aug 6;383(6):517-525
pubmed: 32492293
Cell Discov. 2020 Mar 18;6:16
pubmed: 32194981
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Aug;108(2):188
pubmed: 32350860
N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 29;379(22):2173-2176
pubmed: 30485769
Antiviral Res. 2014 Apr;104:84-92
pubmed: 24486952
Dis Model Mech. 2016 Jan;9(1):91-8
pubmed: 26563390
J Virus Erad. 2020 Apr 30;6(2):45-51
pubmed: 32405421
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013 Dec 26;7(12):e2614
pubmed: 24386500
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Aug;108(2):253-263
pubmed: 32285930
Sci Rep. 2018 May 15;8(1):7604
pubmed: 29765101
Cell Host Microbe. 2020 May 13;27(5):704-709.e2
pubmed: 32259477
Lab Invest. 2016 Jun;96(6):692-704
pubmed: 27019389
Science. 2020 May 29;368(6494):1012-1015
pubmed: 32303590
Br J Pharmacol. 2020 Nov;177(21):4851-4865
pubmed: 32462701
Pharmacol Res. 2020 Aug;158:104904
pubmed: 32430286
Genome Res. 2012 Mar;22(3):568-76
pubmed: 22300766
Nature. 2020 Sep;585(7824):268-272
pubmed: 32396922
Nat Rev Immunol. 2020 Jun;20(6):363-374
pubmed: 32346093
Sci Rep. 2020 Aug 4;10(1):13093
pubmed: 32753646