Differences in rearfoot, midfoot, and forefoot kinematics of normal foot and flatfoot during running.
flatfoot
foot kinematics
running injury
Journal
Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society
ISSN: 1554-527X
Titre abrégé: J Orthop Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8404726
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2021
03 2021
Historique:
received:
16
07
2020
revised:
23
09
2020
accepted:
06
10
2020
pubmed:
11
10
2020
medline:
5
5
2021
entrez:
10
10
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Flatfoot is a common foot deformity, which could contribute to running injuries such as medial tibial stress syndrome. Intrafoot kinematics of flatfoot during walking have often been documented using multisegment foot models. However, the intrafoot kinematics of flatfoot during running remains unclear, despite the possible relationship between flatfoot and running injuries. We aimed to clarify rearfoot, midfoot, and forefoot kinematics when running in participants with normal foot and flatfoot. Participants with the normal foot (n = 14) and flatfoot (n = 14) were asked to runover-ground at their preferred speed. Three-dimensional kinematics of the rearfoot, midfoot, and forefoot during running were calculated based on the Rizzoli foot model. A two-sample t-test of statistical parametric mapping was performed to determine differences between normal foot and flatfoot in time histories of intrafoot kinematics during running. No differences were found between groups in characteristics and spatiotemporal parameters. In the frontal rearfoot angle, a significantly increased eversion from 24% to 100% (p < .001) was observed in the flatfoot compared to the normal foot. At the midfoot angle, a significantly increased eversion from 0% to 4% (p < .049) and 21% to 100% (p < .001) was observed in the flatfoot compared to the normal foot. At the forefoot angle, a significantly increased inversion from 6% to 17% (p < .047) was observed in the flatfoot compared to the normal foot. These findings may be useful to explain why flatfoot could contribute to running injuries such as medial tibial stress syndrome.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
565-571Informations de copyright
© 2020 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Références
Pita-Fernandez S. Flat foot in a random population and its impact on quality of life and functionality. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11:Lc22-lc27.
WilliamsMcClay, IS, Hamill J. Arch structure and injury patterns in runners. Clin Biomech. 2001;16:341-347.
Bennett JE, Reinking MF, Pluemer B, Pentel A, Seaton M, Killian C. Factors contributing to the development of medial tibial stress syndrome in high school runners. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2001;31:504-510.
Newman P, Witchalls J, Waddington G, Adams R. Risk factors associated with medial tibial stress syndrome in runners: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Open Access J Sports Med. 2013;4:229-241.
Leardini A, Caravaggi P, Theologis T, Stebbins J. Multi-segment foot models and their use in clinical populations. Gait Posture. 2019;69:50-59.
Buldt AK, Levinger P, Murley GS, Menz HB, Nester CJ, Landorf KB. Foot posture is associated with kinematics of the foot during gait: a comparison of normal, planus and cavus feet. Gait Posture. 2015;42:42-48.
Cobb SC, Tis LL, Johnson JT, Wang Y, Geil MD, McCarty FA. The effect of low-mobile foot posture on multi-segment medial foot model gait kinematics. Gait Posture. 2009;30:334-339.
Levinger P, Murley GS, Barton CJ, Cotchett MP, McSweeney SR, Menz HB. A comparison of foot kinematics in people with normal- and flat-arched feet using the Oxford Foot Model. Gait Posture. 2010;32:519-523.
Williams DS, McClay IS, Hamill J, Buchanan TS. Lower extremity kinematic and kinetic differences in runners with high and low arches. J Appl Biomech. 2001;17:153-163.
Caravaggi P, Sforza C, Leardini A, Portinaro N, Panou A. Effect of plano-valgus foot posture on midfoot kinematics during barefoot walking in an adolescent population. J Foot Ankle Res. 2018;11:55.
Zhang X, Aeles J, Vanwanseele B. Comparison of foot muscle morphology and foot kinematics between recreational runners with normal feet and with asymptomatic over-pronated feet. Gait Posture. 2017;54:290-294.
Saraswat P, MacWilliams BA, Davis RB, D'Astous JL. Kinematics and kinetics of normal and planovalgus feet during walking. Gait Posture. 2014;39:339-345.
Buldt AK, Murley GS, Butterworth P, Levinger P, Menz HB, Landorf KB. The relationship between foot posture and lower limb kinematics during walking: a systematic review. Gait Posture. 2013;38:363-372.
Hollander K, Zech A, Rahlf AL, Orendurff MS, Stebbins J, Heidt C. The relationship between static and dynamic foot posture and running biomechanics: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gait Posture. 2019;72:109-122.
Giarmatzis G, Jonkers I, Wesseling M, Van Rossom S, Verschueren S. Loading of hip measured by hip contact forces at different speeds of walking and running. J Bone Miner Res. 2015;30:1431-1440.
Novacheck TF. The biomechanics of running. Gait Posture. 1998;7:77-95.
Jin L, Hahn ME. Modulation of lower extremity joint stiffness, work and power at different walking and running speeds. Hum Mov Sci. 2018;58:1-9.
Cappellini G, Ivanenko YP, Poppele RE, Lacquaniti F. Motor patterns in human walking and running. J Neurophysiol. 2006;95:3426-3437.
Ounpuu S. The biomechanics of walking and running. Clin Sports Med. 1994;13:843-863.
Pohl MB, Messenger N, Buckley JG. Forefoot, rearfoot and shank coupling: effect of variations in speed and mode of gait. Gait Posture. 2007;25:295-302.
Takabayashi T, Edama M, Yokoyama E, Kanaya C, Kubo M. Quantifying coordination among the rearfoot, midfoot, and forefoot segments during running. Sports Biomech. 2018;17:18-32.
Okunuki T, Koshino Y, Yamanaka M, et al. Forefoot and hindfoot kinematics in subjects with medial tibial stress syndrome during walking and running. J Orthop Res. 2019;37:927-932.
Redmond AC, Crane YZ, Menz HB. Normative values for the foot posture index. J Foot Ankle Res. 2008;1:6.
Leardini A, Benedetti MG, Berti L, Bettinelli D, Nativo R, Giannini S. Rear-foot, mid-foot and fore-foot motion during the stance phase of gait. Gait Posture. 2007;25:453-462.
Seo SG, Lee DY, Moon HJ, et al. Repeatability of a multi-segment foot model with a 15-marker set in healthy adults. J Foot Ankle Res. 2014;7:24.
Deschamps K, Staes F, Bruyninckx H, et al. Repeatability of a 3D multi-segment foot model protocol in presence of foot deformities. Gait Posture. 2012;36:635-638.
Cappozzo A, Catani F, Della Croce U, Leardini A. Position and orientation in space of bones during movement: anatomical frame definition and determination. Clin Biomech. 1995;10:171-178.
Deschamps K, Eerdekens M, Peters H, Matricali GA, Staes F. Multi-segment foot kinematics during running and its association with striking patterns. Sports Biomech. 2019:1-14.
Cavanagh PR, Lafortune MA. Ground reaction forces in distance running. J Biomech. 1980;13:397-406.
McKeon PO, Hertel J, Bramble D, Davis I. The foot core system: a new paradigm for understanding intrinsic foot muscle function. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49:290.
Jung DY, Kim MH, Koh EK, Kwon OY, Cynn HS, Lee WH. A comparison in the muscle activity of the abductor hallucis and the medial longitudinal arch angle during toe curl and short foot exercises. Phys Ther Sport. 2011;12:30-35.
Angin S, Crofts G, Mickle KJ, Nester CJ. Ultrasound evaluation of foot muscles and plantar fascia in pes planus. Gait Posture. 2014;40:48-52.
Hösl M, Böhm H, Multerer C, Döderlein L. Does excessive flatfoot deformity affect function? A comparison between symptomatic and asymptomatic flatfeet using the Oxford Foot Model. Gait Posture. 2014;39:23-28.
Zifchock RA, Theriot C, Hillstrom HJ, Song J, Neary M. The Relationship between arch height and arch flexibility: a proposed arch flexibility classification system for the description of multidimensional foot ftructure. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2017;107:119-123.
Bouche RT, Johnson CH. Medial tibial stress syndrome (tibial fasciitis): a proposed pathomechanical model involving fascial traction. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2007;97:31-36.
Edama M, Onishi H, Kubo M, et al. Gender differences of muscle and crural fascia origins in relation to the occurrence of medial tibial stress syndrome. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015;27:203-208.
Thordarson DB, Schmotzer H, Chon J, Peters J. Dynamic support of the human longitudinal arch. A biomechanical evaluation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;316:165-172.
Wang R, Gutierrez-Farewik EM. The effect of subtalar inversion/eversion on the dynamic function of the tibialis anterior, soleus, and gastrocnemius during the stance phase of gait. Gait Posture. 2011;34:29-35.
Shin HS, Lee JH, Kim EJ, Kyung MG, Yoo HJ, Lee DY. Flatfoot deformity affected the kinematics of the foot and ankle in proportion to the severity of deformity. Gait Posture. 2019;72:123-128.
Böhm H, Oestreich C, Rethwilm R, et al. Cluster analysis to identify foot motion patterns in children with flexible flatfeet using gait analysis-A statistical approach to detect decompensated pathology? Gait Posture. 2019;71:151-156.
Dingenen B, Deschamps K, Delchambre F, Van Peer E, Staes FF, Matricali GA. Effect of taping on multi-segmental foot kinematic patterns during walking in persons with chronic ankle instability. J Sci Med Sport. 2017;20:835-840.
Takabayashi T, Edama M, Inai T, Kubo M. Sex-related differences in coordination and variability among foot joints during running. J Foot Ankle Res. 2018;11:53.
Barnes A, Wheat J, Milner CE. Use of gait sandals for measuring rearfoot and shank motion during running. Gait Posture. 2010;32:133-135.
Altman AR, Davis IS. A kinematic method for footstrike pattern detection in barefoot and shod runners. Gait Posture. 2012;35:298-300.
Stiffler-Joachim MR, Wille CM, Kliethermes SA, Johnston W, Heiderscheit BC. Foot angle and loading rate during running demonstrate a nonlinear relationship. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019;51:2067-2072.