Estimating the Lifetime Benefits of Treatments for Heart Failure.
restricted mean survival time
survival models
treatment effects
trials
Journal
JACC. Heart failure
ISSN: 2213-1787
Titre abrégé: JACC Heart Fail
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101598241
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2020
12 2020
Historique:
received:
14
04
2020
revised:
04
08
2020
accepted:
04
08
2020
pubmed:
12
10
2020
medline:
18
9
2021
entrez:
11
10
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This study compared ways of describing treatment effects. The objective was to better explain to clinicians and patients what they might expect from a given treatment, not only in terms of relative and absolute risk reduction, but also in projections of long-term survival. The restricted mean survival time (RMST) can be used to estimate of long-term survival, providing a complementary approach to more conventional metrics (e.g., absolute and relative risk), which may suggest greater benefits of therapy in high-risk patients compared with low-risk patients. Relative and absolute risk, as well as the RMST, were calculated in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) trials. As examples, in the RALES trial (more severe HFrEF), the treatment effect metrics for spironolactone versus placebo on heart failure hospitalization and/or cardiovascular death were a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.67 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.5 to 0.77), number needed to treat = 9 (7 to 14), and age extension of event-free survival +1.1 years (-0.1 to + 2.3 years). The corresponding metrics for EMPHASIS-HF (eplerenone vs. placebo in less severe HFrEF) were 0.64 (0.54 to 0.75), 14 (1 to 22), and +2.9 (1.2 to 4.5). In patients in PARADIGM-HF aged younger than 65 years, the metrics for sacubitril/valsartan versus enalapril were 0.77 (95% CI: 0.68 to 0.88), 23 (15 to 44), and +1.7 (0.6 to 2.8) years; for those aged 65 years or older, the metrics were 0.83 (95% CI: 0.73 to 0.94), 29 (17 to 83), and +0.9 (0.2 to 1.6) years, which provided evidence of a greater potential life extension in younger patients. Similar observations were found for lower risk patients. RMST event-free (and overall) survival estimates provided a complementary means of evaluating the effect of therapy in relation to age and risk. They also provided a clinically useful metric that should be routinely reported and used to explain the potential long-term benefits of a given treatment, especially to younger and less symptomatic patients.
Sections du résumé
OBJECTIVES
This study compared ways of describing treatment effects. The objective was to better explain to clinicians and patients what they might expect from a given treatment, not only in terms of relative and absolute risk reduction, but also in projections of long-term survival.
BACKGROUND
The restricted mean survival time (RMST) can be used to estimate of long-term survival, providing a complementary approach to more conventional metrics (e.g., absolute and relative risk), which may suggest greater benefits of therapy in high-risk patients compared with low-risk patients.
METHODS
Relative and absolute risk, as well as the RMST, were calculated in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) trials.
RESULTS
As examples, in the RALES trial (more severe HFrEF), the treatment effect metrics for spironolactone versus placebo on heart failure hospitalization and/or cardiovascular death were a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.67 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.5 to 0.77), number needed to treat = 9 (7 to 14), and age extension of event-free survival +1.1 years (-0.1 to + 2.3 years). The corresponding metrics for EMPHASIS-HF (eplerenone vs. placebo in less severe HFrEF) were 0.64 (0.54 to 0.75), 14 (1 to 22), and +2.9 (1.2 to 4.5). In patients in PARADIGM-HF aged younger than 65 years, the metrics for sacubitril/valsartan versus enalapril were 0.77 (95% CI: 0.68 to 0.88), 23 (15 to 44), and +1.7 (0.6 to 2.8) years; for those aged 65 years or older, the metrics were 0.83 (95% CI: 0.73 to 0.94), 29 (17 to 83), and +0.9 (0.2 to 1.6) years, which provided evidence of a greater potential life extension in younger patients. Similar observations were found for lower risk patients.
CONCLUSIONS
RMST event-free (and overall) survival estimates provided a complementary means of evaluating the effect of therapy in relation to age and risk. They also provided a clinically useful metric that should be routinely reported and used to explain the potential long-term benefits of a given treatment, especially to younger and less symptomatic patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33039448
pii: S2213-1779(20)30456-X
doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2020.08.004
pmc: PMC7720789
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists
0
Spironolactone
27O7W4T232
Eplerenone
6995V82D0B
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
984-995Subventions
Organisme : British Heart Foundation
ID : FS/20/25/34983
Pays : United Kingdom
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Author Disclosures Drs. Ferreira and Zannad are supported by ANR-15-RHU-0004 and ANR-15-IDEX-04-LUE. Drs. Jhund, Petrie, and McMurray are supported by the British Heart Foundation (grant RE/18/6/34217). All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.
Références
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Dec 07;13:152
pubmed: 24314264
JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Nov 1;2(11):1179-1180
pubmed: 28877311
Eur Heart J. 2019 May 1;40(17):1378-1383
pubmed: 30500891
Circulation. 2018 Oct 9;138(15):1599-1601
pubmed: 30354516
Biometrics. 2016 Mar;72(1):215-21
pubmed: 26302239
N Engl J Med. 2015 Dec 3;373(23):2289-90
pubmed: 26630151
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 May 14;73(18):2357-2359
pubmed: 31072582
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Aug 1;32(22):2380-5
pubmed: 24982461