Cytomegalovirus disease in de novo kidney-transplant recipients: comparison of everolimus-based immunosuppression without prophylaxis with mycophenolic acid-based immunosuppression with prophylaxis.
Adult
Aged
Cytomegalovirus Infections
/ epidemiology
Drug Combinations
Everolimus
/ administration & dosage
Female
Humans
Immunosuppressive Agents
/ administration & dosage
Incidence
Kidney Transplantation
Male
Middle Aged
Mycophenolic Acid
/ administration & dosage
Postoperative Complications
/ epidemiology
Retrospective Studies
Tacrolimus
/ administration & dosage
Cytomegalovirus
Everolimus
Kidney transplantation
Mycophenolic acid
Prophylaxis
Valganciclovir
Journal
International urology and nephrology
ISSN: 1573-2584
Titre abrégé: Int Urol Nephrol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 0262521
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2021
Mar 2021
Historique:
received:
10
04
2020
accepted:
03
10
2020
pubmed:
16
10
2020
medline:
23
7
2021
entrez:
15
10
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To compare everolimus (EVR) plus low-dose tacrolimus (TAC) with mycophenolic acid (MPA) plus standard-dose TAC with regards to rates of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in de novo kidney-transplant recipients (KTRs). This single-center retrospective study included 187 de novo KTRs; 59 patients (31.6%) received EVR/low-dose TAC (group 1); 128 patients (68.4%) received MPA with standard-dose TAC (group 2). All received anti-thymocyte globulins as the induction therapy, and steroid-sparing strategy. Valganciclovir prophylaxis was mandatory for CMV D+/R- KTRs (seronegative recipients of a seropositive donor) in both groups and for R+ seropositive recipients (only in group 2). The 2-year incidence of CMV disease was low and comparable between groups: 6.8% and 7.0% in groups 1 and 2, respectively (p = 0.94). There was no statistical difference in CMV serostatus (p = 1). However, CMV disease tended to be less frequent, though not statistically different, in R+ KTRs receiving EVR without prophylaxis (3.7% vs. 8.5% in groups 1 and 2, respectively) and in patients without EVR discontinuation (2.6% vs. 6.9% in patients who did not discontinue MPA (p = 0.29). Two-year graft function was good and comparable between groups (median eGFR of 54.2 and 53.0 mL/min in groups 1 and 2, respectively; p = 0.47); incidence of immunological events was low. Significantly more patients in group 1 discontinued EVR because of adverse events than patients that discontinued MPA in group 2 (35.6% in group 1 vs. 10.2% in group 2; p < 0.001). Everolimus plus low-dose TAC given to de novo KTRs was associated with low rates of CMV disease, especially in R+ patients with no CMV prophylaxis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33058036
doi: 10.1007/s11255-020-02676-8
pii: 10.1007/s11255-020-02676-8
doi:
Substances chimiques
Drug Combinations
0
Immunosuppressive Agents
0
Everolimus
9HW64Q8G6G
Mycophenolic Acid
HU9DX48N0T
Tacrolimus
WM0HAQ4WNM
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
591-600Références
De Keyzer K, Van Laecke S, Peeters P, Vanholder R (2011) Human cytomegalovirus and kidney transplantation: a clinician’s update. Am J Kidney Dis 58:118–126. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.04.010
doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.04.010
pubmed: 21684438
Hodson EM, Jones CA, Webster AC, Strippoli GF, Barclay PG, Kable K, Vimalachandra D, Craig JC (2005) Antiviral medications to prevent cytomegalovirus disease and early death in recipients of solid-organ transplants: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Lancet 365:2105–2115. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66553-1
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66553-1
pubmed: 15964447
Humar A, Snydman D, AST Infectious Diseases Community of Practice (2009) Cytomegalovirus in solid organ transplant recipients. Am J Transplant 9(Suppl 4):S78–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02897.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02897.x
pubmed: 20070700
Kotton CN, Kumar D, Caliendo AM, Huprikar S, Chou S, Danziger-Isakov L, Humar A (2018) TheThirdInternationalConsensusGuidelinesonthemanagementof cytomegalovirusinsolid-organtransplantation. Transplantation 102:900–931. https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000002191
doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002191
pubmed: 29596116
Fehr T, Cippà PE, Mueller NJ (2015) Cytomegalovirus post kidney transplantation: prophylaxis versus pre-emptive therapy? Transpl Int 28:1351–1356. https://doi.org/10.1111/tri.12629
doi: 10.1111/tri.12629
pubmed: 26138458
Humar A, Lebranchu Y, Vincenti F, Blumberg EA, Punch JD, Limaye AP, Abramowicz D, Jardine AG, Voulgari AT, Ives J, Hauser IA, Peeters P (2010) The efficacy and safety of 200 days valganciclovir cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in high-risk kidney transplant recipients. Am J Transplant 10:1228–1237. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03074.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03074.x
pubmed: 20353469
Arthurs SK, Eid AJ, Pedersen RA, Kremers WK, Cosio FG, Patel R, Razonable RR (2008) Delayed-onset primary cytomegalovirus disease and the risk of allograft failure and mortality after kidney transplantation. Clin Infect Dis 46:840–846. https://doi.org/10.1086/528718
doi: 10.1086/528718
pubmed: 18260785
Florescu DF, Qiu F, Schmidt CM, Kalil AC (2014) A direct and indirect comparison meta-analysis on the efficacy of cytomegalovirus preventive strategies in solid organ transplant. Clin Infect Dis 58:785–803. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cit945
doi: 10.1093/cid/cit945
pubmed: 24385444
Tedesco Silva Jr H, Cibrik D, Johnston T, Lackova E, Mange K, Panis C, Walker R, Wang Z, Zibari G, Kim YS (2010) Everolimusplusreduced-exposureCsAversusmycophenolicacidplusstandard- exposureCsAinrenal-transplantrecipients. Am J Transplant 10:1401–1413. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03129.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03129.x
Tedesco-Silva H, Felipe C, Ferreira A, Cristelli M, Oliveira N, Sandes-Freitas T, Aguiar W, Campos E, Gerbase-De Lima M, Franco M, Medina-Pestana J (2015) Reduced incidence of cytomegalovirus infection in kidney transplant recipients receiving everolimus and reduced tacrolimus doses. Am J Transplant 15:2655–2664. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.13327
doi: 10.1111/ajt.13327
pubmed: 25988935
Qazi Y, Shaffer D, Kaplan B, Kim DY, Luan FL, Peddi VR, Shihab F, Tomlanovich S, Yilmaz S, McCague K, Patel D, Mulgaonkar S (2017) Efficacy and safety of everolimus plus low-dose tacrolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil plus standard-dose tacrolimus in de novo renal transplant recipients: 12-month data. Am J Transplant 17:1358–1369. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.14090
doi: 10.1111/ajt.14090
pubmed: 27775865
Pascual J, Berger SP, Witzke O et al (2018) Everolimus with reduced calcineurin inhibitor exposure in renal transplantation. J Am Soc Nephrol 29:1979–1991. https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2018010009
doi: 10.1681/ASN.2018010009
pubmed: 29752413
pmcid: 6050928
Berger SP, Sommerer C, Witzke O et al (2019) Two-year outcomes in de novo renal transplant recipients receiving everolimus—facilitated calcineurin inhibitor reduction regimen from TRANSFORM study. Am J Transplant 19:3018–3034. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.15480
doi: 10.1111/ajt.15480
pubmed: 31152476
Kudchodkar SB, Yu Y, Maguire TG, Alwine JC (2004) Human cytomegalovirus infection induces rapamycin-insensitive phosphorylation of downstream effectors of mTOR kinase. J Virol 78:11030–11039. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.78.20.11030-11039.2004
doi: 10.1128/JVI.78.20.11030-11039.2004
pubmed: 15452223
pmcid: 521827
Gerna G, Lilleri D, Chiesa A, Zelini P, Furione M, Comolli G, Pellegrini C, Sarchi E, Migotto C, Bonora MR, Meloni F, Arbustini E (2011) Virologic and immunologic monitoring of cytomegalovirus to guide preemptive therapy in solid-organ transplantation. Am J Transplant 11:2463–2471. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03636.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03636.x
pubmed: 21827612
Devresse A, Leruez-Ville M, Scemia A et al (2018) Reduction in late onset cytomegalovirus primary disease after discontinuation of antiviral prophylaxis in kidney transplant recipients treated with de novo everolimus. Transpl Infect Dis 20:e12846. https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.12846
doi: 10.1111/tid.12846
pubmed: 29360195
Cristelli MP, Esmeraldo RM, Pinto CM et al (2018) The influence of mTOR inhibitors on the incidence of CMV infection in high-risk donor positive-recipient negative (D+/R-) kidney transplant recipients. Transpl Infect Dis 20:e12907. https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.12907
doi: 10.1111/tid.12907
pubmed: 29679515
Ljungman P, Boeckh M, Hirsch HH, Josephson F, Lundgren J, Nichols G, Pikis A, Razonable RR, Miller V, Griffiths PD (2017) Disease Definitions Working Group of the Cytomegalovirus Drug Development Forum (2017) definitions of cytomegalovirus infection and disease in transplant patients for use in clinical trials. Clin Infect Dis 64(1):87–91. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciw668
doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw668
pubmed: 27682069
Basso G, Felipe CR, Cristelli MP et al (2018) The effect of anti-thymocyte globulin and everolimus on the kinetics of cytomegalovirus viral load in seropositive kidney transplant recipients without prophylaxis. Transpl Infect Dis 20:e12919. https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.12919
doi: 10.1111/tid.12919
pubmed: 29797676
Brennan DC, Legendre C, Patel D, Mange K, Wiland A, McCague K, Shihab FS (2011) Cytomegalovirus incidence between everolimus versus mycophenolate in de novo renal transplants: pooled analysis of three clinical trials. Am J Transplant 11:2453–2462. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03674.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03674.x
pubmed: 21812923
Shihab F, Qazi Y, Mulgaonkar S, McCague K, Patel D, Peddi VR, Shaffer D (2017) Association of clinical events with everolimus exposure in kidney transplant patients receiving low doses of tacrolimus. Am J Transplant 17:2363–2371. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.14215
doi: 10.1111/ajt.14215
pubmed: 28141897
pmcid: 5600116
Mithani Z, Gralla J, Adebiyi O, Klem P, Cooper JE, Wiseman AC (2018) De novo donor-specific antibody formation in tacrolimus-based, mycophenolate versus mammalian target of rapamycin immunosuppressive regimens. Exp Clin Transplant 16:23–30. https://doi.org/10.6002/ect.2016.0234
doi: 10.6002/ect.2016.0234
pubmed: 28332959
Kurdi A, Martinet W, De Meyer GRY (2018) mTOR inhibition and cardiovascular diseases: dyslipidemia and atherosclerosis. Transplantation 102:S44–S46. https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000001693
doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001693
pubmed: 28230638