A modular design strategy to integrate mechanotransduction concepts in scaffold-based bone tissue engineering.

Bone tissue engineering Load-bearing bone defects Mechanotransduction Scaffold design

Journal

Acta biomaterialia
ISSN: 1878-7568
Titre abrégé: Acta Biomater
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101233144

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 2020
Historique:
received: 07 06 2020
revised: 01 10 2020
accepted: 08 10 2020
pubmed: 16 10 2020
medline: 15 5 2021
entrez: 15 10 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Repair or regeneration of load-bearing bones has long been an incentive for the tissue engineering community to develop a plethora of synthetic bone scaffolds. Despite the key role of physical forces and the mechanical environment in bone regeneration, the mechanotransduction concept has rarely been incorporated in structural design of bone tissue scaffolds, particularly those made of bioactive materials such as hydrogels and bioceramics. Herein, we introduce a modular design strategy to fabricate a load bearing device that can support a wide range of hydrogel- and ceramic-based scaffolds against complex in-vivo loading conditions to induce desirable mechanical strains for bone regeneration within the scaffolds. The device is comprised of a fenestrated polymeric shell and ceramic structural pillars arranged in a sophisticated configuration to provide ample internal space for the scaffold, also enabling it to purposely regulate the levels of strains and stresses within the scaffolds. Utilizing this top-down design approach, we demonstrate that the failure load of alginate hydrogels increases 3200-fold in compression, 300-fold in shear and 75-fold in impact, achieving the values that enable them to withstand physiological loads in weight-bearing sites, while allowing generation of osteoinductive strains (i.e., 0.2-0.4%) in the hydrogel. This modular design approach opens a broad range of opportunities to utilize various bioactive but mechanically weak scaffolds for the treatment of load-bearing defects and exploiting mechanobiology strategies to improve bone regeneration.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33059100
pii: S1742-7061(20)30601-2
doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.10.012
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

100-112

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest Authors declare no conflict or competing interest.

Auteurs

Ali Entezari (A)

School of Aerospace, Mechanical and Mechatronic Engineering, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2008, Australia.

Michael V Swain (MV)

School of Aerospace, Mechanical and Mechatronic Engineering, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2008, Australia.

J Justin Gooding (JJ)

School of Chemistry, Australian Centre for Nanomedicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney NSW 2052, Australia.

Iman Roohani (I)

School of Chemistry, Australian Centre for Nanomedicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney NSW 2052, Australia. Electronic address: iman.roohani@unsw.edu.au.

Qing Li (Q)

School of Aerospace, Mechanical and Mechatronic Engineering, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2008, Australia. Electronic address: qing.li@sydney.edu.au.

Articles similaires

Organoids Humans Tissue Engineering Coculture Techniques Regenerative Medicine
Animals Osteogenesis Osteoporosis Mesenchymal Stem Cells Humans
Organoids Animals Kidney Mice Humans
Humans Retinal Pigment Epithelium Retinal Degeneration Animals Tissue Scaffolds

Classifications MeSH