Examination of Metoprolol Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics Across CYP2D6 Genotype-Derived Activity Scores.
Administration, Oral
Adrenergic beta-1 Receptor Antagonists
/ administration & dosage
Adult
Aged
Blood Pressure
/ drug effects
Cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6
/ genetics
Female
Genotype
Heart Rate
/ drug effects
Humans
Male
Metoprolol
/ administration & dosage
Middle Aged
Pharmacogenetics
Phenotype
Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
Prospective Studies
Journal
CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology
ISSN: 2163-8306
Titre abrégé: CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101580011
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2020
12 2020
Historique:
received:
05
08
2020
accepted:
29
09
2020
pubmed:
18
10
2020
medline:
9
11
2021
entrez:
17
10
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Recent CYP2D6 phenotype standardization efforts by CYP2D6 activity score (AS) are based on limited pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) data. Using data from two independent clinical trials of metoprolol, we compared metoprolol PK and PD across CYP2D6 AS with the goal of determining whether the PK and PD data support the new phenotype classification. S-metoprolol apparent oral clearance (CLo), adjusted for clinical factors, was correlated with CYP2D6 AS (P < 0.001). The natural log of CLo was lower with an AS of 1 (7.6 ± 0.4 mL/minute) vs. 2-2.25 (8.3 ± 0.6 mL/minute; P = 0.012), similar between an AS of 1 and 1.25-1.5 (7.8 ± 0.5 mL/minute; P = 0.702), and lower with an AS of 1.25-1.5 vs. 2-2.25 (P = 0.03). There was also a greater reduction in heart rate with metoprolol among study participants with AS of 1 (-10.8 ± 5.5) vs. 2-2.25 (-7.1 ± 5.6; P < 0.001) and no significant difference between those with an AS of 1 and 1.25-1.5 (-9.2 ± 4.7; P = 0.095). These data highlight linear trends among CYP2D6 AS and metoprolol PK and PD, but inconsistencies with the phenotypes assigned by AS based on the current standards. Overall, this case study with metoprolol suggests that utilizing CYP2D6 AS, instead of collapsing AS into phenotype categories, may be the most precise approach for utilizing CYP2D6 pharmacogenomics in clinical practice.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33067866
doi: 10.1002/psp4.12563
pmc: PMC7762806
doi:
Substances chimiques
Adrenergic beta-1 Receptor Antagonists
0
Cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6
EC 1.14.14.1
Metoprolol
GEB06NHM23
Types de publication
Clinical Trial
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
678-685Subventions
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR001427
Pays : United States
Organisme : FDA HHS
ID : 1U01 FD005235
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : U01 GM074492
Pays : United States
Organisme : FDA HHS
ID : U01 FD005235
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHGRI NIH HHS
ID : T32 HG008958
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors. CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.
Références
Pharmacogenetics. 2002 Aug;12(6):465-72
pubmed: 12172215
PLoS One. 2015 Jan 27;10(1):e0113808
pubmed: 25625348
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2005 Oct;78(4):378-87
pubmed: 16198657
Drug Metab Dispos. 1996 Mar;24(3):350-5
pubmed: 8820427
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2005 Nov;46(5):713-20
pubmed: 16220080
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011 May;89(5):662-73
pubmed: 21412232
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2014 Aug;96(2):175-81
pubmed: 24637943
Pharmacol Ther. 1990;46(3):377-94
pubmed: 2188269
Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2020 Oct;16(10):953-964
pubmed: 32726152
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1998 Aug;54(6):469-74
pubmed: 9776437
Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2019 Feb;29(2):39-47
pubmed: 30520769
J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1978 Apr;6(2):165-75
pubmed: 671222
Hum Mol Genet. 2014 Jan 1;23(1):268-78
pubmed: 23985325
J Clin Pharmacol. 2010 Apr;50(4):450-8
pubmed: 20081063
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2009;48(11):689-723
pubmed: 19817501
Hum Mol Genet. 2015 Mar 15;24(6):1556-62
pubmed: 25381333
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018 May;103(5):770-777
pubmed: 29385237
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2008 Dec;64(12):1163-73
pubmed: 18648788
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Jul;102(1):37-44
pubmed: 27997040
Curr Drug Metab. 2014 Feb;15(2):218-32
pubmed: 24524666
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2004 Dec;76(6):536-44
pubmed: 15592325
JAMA. 2019 Jun 25;321(24):2428-2437
pubmed: 31237645
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2012 Nov;68(11):1483-91
pubmed: 22543981
Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Jan;13(1):116-124
pubmed: 31647186
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2015 Aug;98(2):127-34
pubmed: 25974703
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2004 Oct;76(4):302-12
pubmed: 15470329
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2014 Apr;95(4):376-82
pubmed: 24458010
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2007 May;63(5):575-82
pubmed: 17094780
Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91
pubmed: 17695343
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2008 Feb;83(2):234-42
pubmed: 17971818
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Apr;103(4):599-618
pubmed: 28994452
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2019 Jul;106(1):94-102
pubmed: 30801677
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2013 Sep;94(3):394-9
pubmed: 23665868
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2014 Mar;95(3):321-30
pubmed: 24193112
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Aug;102(2):213-218
pubmed: 28002639
Bioinformatics. 2015 Nov 1;31(21):3555-7
pubmed: 26139635