Assessment of the Precision ID Identity Panel kit on challenging forensic samples.
DNA degradation
Massive parallel sequencing
Precision ID Identity Panel
Single nucleotide polymorphism
Journal
Forensic science international. Genetics
ISSN: 1878-0326
Titre abrégé: Forensic Sci Int Genet
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101317016
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2020
11 2020
Historique:
received:
24
07
2020
revised:
28
08
2020
accepted:
25
09
2020
pubmed:
20
10
2020
medline:
14
7
2021
entrez:
19
10
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The performance of the Precision ID Identity Panel (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was assessed on a set of 87 forensic samples with different levels of degradation for which a reference sample from the "same donor" or from a "first degree relative" was available. PCR-MPS analysis was performed with DNA input ranging from 1 ng to 12 pg and through 21-26 PCR cycles, in replicate tests, and a total number of 255 libraries were sequenced on the Ion Personal Genome Machine™ (PGM™) System. The evaluation of the molecular data allowed to set a fix threshold for locus call at 50 x which suitably worked even when low amounts of degraded DNA (12 pg) were investigated. In these analytical conditions, in fact, 25 PCR cycles allowed the genotyping of about 50 % and 35 % of the autosomal and the Y-specific markers on average, respectively, for each single amplification with a negligible frequency of drop ins (0.01 %). On the other hand, drop out artefacts reached 18-23 % when low copy number and degraded DNA samples were studied, with surviving alleles showing more than 600 reads in 2.9 % of the cases. Our data pointed out that the Precision ID Identity Panel allowed accurate typing of almost any amount of good quality/moderately degraded DNA samples, in duplicate tests. The analysis of low copy number DNAs evidenced that the same allele of a heterozygous genotype could be lost twice, thus suggesting that a third amplification could be useful for a correct genotype assignment in these peculiar cases. Using the consensus approach, a limited number of genotyping errors were computed and about 37 % of the autosomal markers was finally typed with a corresponding combined random match probability of at least 1.6 × 10
Identifiants
pubmed: 33075733
pii: S1872-4973(20)30172-1
doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2020.102400
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
DNA, Bacterial
0
DNA
9007-49-2
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
102400Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.