The histone and non-histone methyllysine reader activities of the UHRF1 tandem Tudor domain are dispensable for the propagation of aberrant DNA methylation patterning in cancer cells.
CCAAT-Enhancer-Binding Proteins
/ chemistry
DNA Methylation
Epigenesis, Genetic
Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic
HCT116 Cells
HeLa Cells
Histone Code
Histones
/ chemistry
Humans
Lysine
/ metabolism
Methylation
Protein Processing, Post-Translational
Tudor Domain
Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases
/ chemistry
Journal
Epigenetics & chromatin
ISSN: 1756-8935
Titre abrégé: Epigenetics Chromatin
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101471619
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 10 2020
23 10 2020
Historique:
received:
22
04
2020
accepted:
15
10
2020
entrez:
24
10
2020
pubmed:
25
10
2020
medline:
11
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The chromatin-binding E3 ubiquitin ligase ubiquitin-like with PHD and RING finger domains 1 (UHRF1) contributes to the maintenance of aberrant DNA methylation patterning in cancer cells through multivalent histone and DNA recognition. The tandem Tudor domain (TTD) of UHRF1 is well-characterized as a reader of lysine 9 di- and tri-methylation on histone H3 (H3K9me2/me3) and, more recently, lysine 126 di- and tri-methylation on DNA ligase 1 (LIG1K126me2/me3). However, the functional significance and selectivity of these interactions remain unclear. In this study, we used protein domain microarrays to search for additional readers of LIG1K126me2, the preferred methyl state bound by the UHRF1 TTD. We show that the UHRF1 TTD binds LIG1K126me2 with high affinity and selectivity compared to other known methyllysine readers. Notably, and unlike H3K9me2/me3, the UHRF1 plant homeodomain (PHD) and its N-terminal linker (L2) do not contribute to multivalent LIG1K126me2 recognition along with the TTD. To test the functional significance of this interaction, we designed a LIG1K126me2 cell-penetrating peptide (CPP). Consistent with LIG1 knockdown, uptake of the CPP had no significant effect on the propagation of DNA methylation patterning across the genomes of bulk populations from high-resolution analysis of several cancer cell lines. Further, we did not detect significant changes in DNA methylation patterning from bulk cell populations after chemical or genetic disruption of lysine methyltransferase activity associated with LIG1K126me2 and H3K9me2. Collectively, these studies identify UHRF1 as a selective reader of LIG1K126me2 in vitro and further implicate the histone and non-histone methyllysine reader activity of the UHRF1 TTD as a dispensable domain function for cancer cell DNA methylation maintenance.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33097091
doi: 10.1186/s13072-020-00366-4
pii: 10.1186/s13072-020-00366-4
pmc: PMC7585203
doi:
Substances chimiques
CCAAT-Enhancer-Binding Proteins
0
Histones
0
UHRF1 protein, human
EC 2.3.2.27
Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases
EC 2.3.2.27
Lysine
K3Z4F929H6
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
44Subventions
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : R01 GM126421
Pays : United States
Organisme : Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas
ID : RP 180804
Pays : International
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R21 CA216673
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : R35 GM124736
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : F99 CA245821
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA016086
Pays : United States
Références
Nature. 2008 Oct 9;455(7214):818-21
pubmed: 18772891
Nat Commun. 2016 Aug 24;7:12464
pubmed: 27554592
Nucleic Acids Res. 2018 Nov 16;46(20):e123
pubmed: 30085201
Methods. 2019 Aug 23;:
pubmed: 31449908
Mol Cell Proteomics. 2014 Dec;13(12):3497-506
pubmed: 25225357
Epigenetics Chromatin. 2018 Oct 4;11(1):56
pubmed: 30286792
Mol Cell. 2018 Nov 15;72(4):739-752.e9
pubmed: 30392929
Bioconjug Chem. 2009 Apr;20(4):702-9
pubmed: 19331388
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Aug 28;115(35):8775-8780
pubmed: 30104358
Nucleic Acids Res. 2018 May 18;46(9):4405-4416
pubmed: 29506131
J Mol Biol. 2017 Dec 8;429(24):3814-3824
pubmed: 29055779
Sci Rep. 2019 Apr 18;9(1):6265
pubmed: 31000785
Genes Dev. 2002 Jul 15;16(14):1779-91
pubmed: 12130538
Mol Cell. 2017 Aug 17;67(4):550-565.e5
pubmed: 28803780
Biochem J. 2002 Nov 1;367(Pt 3):697-702
pubmed: 12137563
Cancer Cell. 2019 Apr 15;35(4):633-648.e7
pubmed: 30956060
EMBO Rep. 2009 Nov;10(11):1235-41
pubmed: 19834512
J Am Chem Soc. 2018 Sep 12;140(36):11360-11369
pubmed: 30118219
Structure. 2019 Mar 5;27(3):485-496.e7
pubmed: 30639225
Cell Res. 2011 Aug;21(8):1172-81
pubmed: 21606950
Nucleic Acids Res. 2018 Apr 6;46(6):3218-3231
pubmed: 29471350
Nucleic Acids Res. 2011 Oct;39(19):8355-65
pubmed: 21745816
Cell Res. 2011 Dec;21(12):1723-39
pubmed: 22064703
Science. 2013 May 17;340(6134):857-61
pubmed: 23539183
EMBO J. 2010 Nov 3;29(21):3673-87
pubmed: 20871592
Nat Commun. 2013;4:1563
pubmed: 23463006
Cell Chem Biol. 2020 Jan 16;27(1):47-56.e15
pubmed: 31831267
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 May 31;113(22):6182-7
pubmed: 27185940
Mol Cell. 2017 Oct 19;68(2):350-360.e7
pubmed: 29053958
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Mar 27;109(13):4828-33
pubmed: 22411829
Genes Dev. 2013 Jun 1;27(11):1288-98
pubmed: 23752590
Elife. 2016 Sep 06;5:
pubmed: 27595565
Nucleic Acids Res. 2018 Sep 28;46(17):9044-9056
pubmed: 30102379
Nat Commun. 2016 Apr 05;7:11197
pubmed: 27045799
Nature. 2013 Oct 10;502(7470):249-53
pubmed: 24013172
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Aug 4;117(31):18439-18447
pubmed: 32675241
Sci Adv. 2018 Nov 28;4(11):eaav2623
pubmed: 30498785
Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2019 Dec 24;4:64
pubmed: 31885879
Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2008 Mar;15(3):245-50
pubmed: 18264113
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2013;78:81-90
pubmed: 24733380
Mol Cell. 2019 Sep 19;75(6):1092-1101
pubmed: 31539507
Org Lett. 2014 Feb 7;16(3):940-3
pubmed: 24456219
Mol Cell Biol. 2004 Mar;24(6):2526-35
pubmed: 14993289
Mol Cell. 2018 Nov 15;72(4):753-765.e6
pubmed: 30392931
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Aug 7;109(32):12950-5
pubmed: 22837395
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004 Jun 25;319(2):590-5
pubmed: 15178447
Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2012 Nov;19(11):1155-60
pubmed: 23022729
Cell Res. 2020 Jun 24;:
pubmed: 32581343
Onco Targets Ther. 2019 Jan 11;12:549-559
pubmed: 30666134
ACS Chem Biol. 2020 Jan 17;15(1):290-295
pubmed: 31846298
J Biol Chem. 2013 Jan 11;288(2):1329-39
pubmed: 23161542
Nat Commun. 2020 Mar 6;11(1):1222
pubmed: 32144273
Cell Chem Biol. 2019 Oct 17;26(10):1365-1379.e22
pubmed: 31422906
Epigenetics Chromatin. 2013 Jul 05;6(1):20
pubmed: 23826629
J Biol Chem. 2011 Jul 8;286(27):24300-11
pubmed: 21489993
EMBO Rep. 2006 Apr;7(4):397-403
pubmed: 16415788
J Biol Chem. 2014 Jan 3;289(1):379-86
pubmed: 24253042
Methods Enzymol. 2016;574:53-77
pubmed: 27423857
Cell Res. 2015 Aug;25(8):911-29
pubmed: 26065575
Nature. 2008 Oct 9;455(7214):822-5
pubmed: 18772889