A Pilot Program Assessing Bronchoscopy Training and Program Initiation in a Low-income Country.


Journal

Journal of bronchology & interventional pulmonology
ISSN: 1948-8270
Titre abrégé: J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101496866

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Apr 2021
Historique:
received: 25 06 2020
accepted: 10 09 2020
pubmed: 27 10 2020
medline: 9 11 2021
entrez: 26 10 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Flexible bronchoscopy is an essential procedure for the evaluation and management of the pulmonary disease. However, this technology and related training is not available in many low-middle income countries (LMICs). We conducted a pilot training program for flexible bronchoscopy in Uganda. A multimodal curriculum was developed with pulmonologists from Uganda and the United States. The training included an online distance learning management system for video content, simulation, just-in-time training, and deliberate practice via clinical proctoring. Procedural standards and a de novo bronchoscopy suite were concurrently developed. Competency was assessed using the Bronchoscopic Skills and Tasks Assessment Tool written examination and the Ontario Bronchoscopy Assessment Tool. We trained 3 pulmonary physicians with no prior experience in flexible bronchoscopy. Three bronchoscopies with bronchoalveolar lavage were performed during the training and an additional 11 cases were performed posttraining. All 3 Ugandan physicians had an increase in their written Bronchoscopic Skills and Tasks Assessment Tool and Ontario Bronchoscopy Assessment Tool in the competent range (P<0.05). All bronchoscopies were successfully completed, adequate samples were obtained, and there were no procedure-related complications. Bronchoscopy implementation in LMICs is feasible, but requires competency-based training. Further studies are needed to validate this curriculum in LMICs, including the use of this type of curriculum for more complicated bronchoscopic procedures.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Flexible bronchoscopy is an essential procedure for the evaluation and management of the pulmonary disease. However, this technology and related training is not available in many low-middle income countries (LMICs). We conducted a pilot training program for flexible bronchoscopy in Uganda.
METHODS METHODS
A multimodal curriculum was developed with pulmonologists from Uganda and the United States. The training included an online distance learning management system for video content, simulation, just-in-time training, and deliberate practice via clinical proctoring. Procedural standards and a de novo bronchoscopy suite were concurrently developed. Competency was assessed using the Bronchoscopic Skills and Tasks Assessment Tool written examination and the Ontario Bronchoscopy Assessment Tool.
RESULTS RESULTS
We trained 3 pulmonary physicians with no prior experience in flexible bronchoscopy. Three bronchoscopies with bronchoalveolar lavage were performed during the training and an additional 11 cases were performed posttraining. All 3 Ugandan physicians had an increase in their written Bronchoscopic Skills and Tasks Assessment Tool and Ontario Bronchoscopy Assessment Tool in the competent range (P<0.05). All bronchoscopies were successfully completed, adequate samples were obtained, and there were no procedure-related complications.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Bronchoscopy implementation in LMICs is feasible, but requires competency-based training. Further studies are needed to validate this curriculum in LMICs, including the use of this type of curriculum for more complicated bronchoscopic procedures.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33105417
pii: 01436970-202104000-00009
doi: 10.1097/LBR.0000000000000721
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

138-142

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Disclosure: H.J.L. has received educational grants and/or consulting fees from Merit Medical, Cook Medical, Veran Medical, and Veracyte. A.C.A. has received consulting fees from Cook Medical and Olympus. L.Y. has received consulting fees from Olympus. For the remaining authors there is no conflict of interest or other disclosures.

Références

Panchabhai TS, Mehta AC. Historical perspectives of bronchoscopy. Connecting the dots. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015;12:631–641.
Du Rand I, Blaikley J, Booton R, et al. British Thoracic Society guideline for diagnostic flexible bronchoscopy in adults: accredited by NICE. Thorax. 2013;68(suppl 1):i1–i44.
Obaseki D, Adeniyi B, Kolawole T, et al. Gaps in capacity for respiratory care in developing countries. Nigeria as a case study. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015;12:591–598.
Sherman CB, Carter EJ, Braendli O, et al. The east African training initiative. A model training program in pulmonary and critical care medicine for low-income countries. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016;13:451–455.
Siddharthan T, Grigsby M, Morgan B, et al. Prevalence of chronic respiratory disease in urban and rural Uganda. Bull World Health Organ. 2019;97:318–327.
Colt HG, Davoudi M, Quadrelli S. Pilot study of web-based bronchoscopy education using the essential bronchoscopist in developing countries (Mozambique and Mauritania). Respiration. 2007;74:358.
Colt HG. The Essential Flexible Bronchoscopist. Laguna Beach, CA: Rake Press; 2015.
Davoudi M, Osann K, Colt HG. Validation of two instruments to assess technical bronchoscopic skill using virtual reality simulation. Respiration. 2008;76:92–101.
Voduc N, Dudek N, Parker CM, et al. Development and validation of a bronchoscopy competence assessment tool in a clinical setting. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016;13:495–501.
Abraham RM, Singaram VS. Using deliberate practice framework to assess the quality of feedback in undergraduate clinical skills training. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19:105.
Pugel AE, Simianu VV, Flum DR, et al. Use of the surgical safety checklist to improve communication and reduce complications. J Infect Public Health. 2015;8:219–225.
Kirenga BJ, Ssengooba W, Muwonge C, et al. Tuberculosis risk factors among tuberculosis patients in Kampala, Uganda: implications for tuberculosis control. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:13.

Auteurs

Trishul Siddharthan (T)

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University.

Peter Jackson (P)

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University.

A Christine Argento (AC)

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, School of Medicine, Northwestern University Evanston, IL.

Ashutosh Sachdeva (A)

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD.

Lonny Yarmus (L)

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University.

Patricia Alupo (P)

Makerere College of Health Sciences.
Makerere Lung Institute, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.

Bruce Kirenga (B)

Makerere College of Health Sciences.
Makerere Lung Institute, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.

William Woordria (W)

Makerere College of Health Sciences.
Makerere Lung Institute, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.

Hans J Lee (HJ)

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH