Dental care for drug users in Norway: dental professionals' attitudes to treatment and experiences with interprofessional collaboration.
Dental care
Dental health services
Dental professionals’ attitudes
Drug users
Interprofessional collaboration
Journal
BMC oral health
ISSN: 1472-6831
Titre abrégé: BMC Oral Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088684
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
31 10 2020
31 10 2020
Historique:
received:
06
01
2020
accepted:
31
08
2020
entrez:
1
11
2020
pubmed:
2
11
2020
medline:
30
12
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The present study aimed to assess dental professionals' attitudes and experiences related to the dental treatment of drug users and to interprofessional collaboration with the rehabilitation institutions (RIs). The study population comprised 141 dentists and dental hygienists (response rate 73%) working in the Public Dental Service (PDS) in three counties in Norway. All of the participants completed an electronically distributed questionnaire on existing practices and experiences regarding dental treatment for drug users and interprofessional collaboration with RIs. The Norwegian Centre for Research Data (NSD) approved the study. Thirty-five percent of the dentists and 10% of the dental hygienists had treated five or more drug users per month (p < 0.05). The majority of dentists and dental hygienists used more time for examination and treatment of drug users compared to other patient groups. Over 70% of dental clinicians considered drug users as demanding patients due to fear, missing appointments, and poor compliance with oral hygiene advice. Multivariable logistic regression analyses showed that attitudes and experiences with dental treatment of drug users were significantly associated with background characteristics of professionals. The overall perception was that drug users often had higher expectations of dental treatment than what could be defined as necessary care and provided by the PDS. One-third of dental professionals reported that they were satisfied with the collaboration they had with RIs. Most of the respondents agreed that personnel from RIs could positively influence interprofessional collaboration by having sufficient knowledge of drug users statutory rights to free of charge dental treatment, as well as by close follow-up and motivation of patients before dental treatment. Dental professionals perceived the management of drug users as demanding due to dental fear, difficulties in coping with appointments, poor compliance to preventive measures, and disagreement between dental treatment defined as necessary and drug users' expectations. Attitudes and experiences related to dental treatment of drug users were significantly associated with background characteristics of clinicians. Organizational barriers regarding leadership, accessibility, and collaborative routines, as well as lack of interprofessional communication, suggest current models of health care delivery to drug users need reviewing.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The present study aimed to assess dental professionals' attitudes and experiences related to the dental treatment of drug users and to interprofessional collaboration with the rehabilitation institutions (RIs).
METHODS
The study population comprised 141 dentists and dental hygienists (response rate 73%) working in the Public Dental Service (PDS) in three counties in Norway. All of the participants completed an electronically distributed questionnaire on existing practices and experiences regarding dental treatment for drug users and interprofessional collaboration with RIs. The Norwegian Centre for Research Data (NSD) approved the study.
RESULTS
Thirty-five percent of the dentists and 10% of the dental hygienists had treated five or more drug users per month (p < 0.05). The majority of dentists and dental hygienists used more time for examination and treatment of drug users compared to other patient groups. Over 70% of dental clinicians considered drug users as demanding patients due to fear, missing appointments, and poor compliance with oral hygiene advice. Multivariable logistic regression analyses showed that attitudes and experiences with dental treatment of drug users were significantly associated with background characteristics of professionals. The overall perception was that drug users often had higher expectations of dental treatment than what could be defined as necessary care and provided by the PDS. One-third of dental professionals reported that they were satisfied with the collaboration they had with RIs. Most of the respondents agreed that personnel from RIs could positively influence interprofessional collaboration by having sufficient knowledge of drug users statutory rights to free of charge dental treatment, as well as by close follow-up and motivation of patients before dental treatment.
CONCLUSIONS
Dental professionals perceived the management of drug users as demanding due to dental fear, difficulties in coping with appointments, poor compliance to preventive measures, and disagreement between dental treatment defined as necessary and drug users' expectations. Attitudes and experiences related to dental treatment of drug users were significantly associated with background characteristics of clinicians. Organizational barriers regarding leadership, accessibility, and collaborative routines, as well as lack of interprofessional communication, suggest current models of health care delivery to drug users need reviewing.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33129288
doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01240-1
pii: 10.1186/s12903-020-01240-1
pmc: PMC7603759
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
299Références
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2007 Oct 30;2:31
pubmed: 17971204
BMC Oral Health. 2016 Jun 06;16(1):66
pubmed: 27268261
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2019 Feb;47(1):78-84
pubmed: 30295331
Br Dent J. 2005 Feb 26;198(4):219-24, discussion 214
pubmed: 15731805
BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 25;7(9):e016078
pubmed: 28951405
J Public Health Dent. 2010 Fall;70(4):276-84
pubmed: 20545828
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1984 Feb;12(1):29-34
pubmed: 6583039
BMC Oral Health. 2011 Sep 18;11:23
pubmed: 21923940
Iran J Public Health. 2013 Sep;42(9):929-40
pubmed: 26060654
Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Oct;13 Suppl 1:i85-90
pubmed: 15465961
Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2011 Dec;8(4):223-34
pubmed: 21858414
Gen Dent. 2010 May-Jun;58(3):236-41; quiz 242-3
pubmed: 20478804
Arch Intern Med. 2005 Mar 28;165(6):618-23
pubmed: 15795336
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2013 Mar;40(2):124-32
pubmed: 22057857
Int J Med Inform. 2014 May;83(5):343-53
pubmed: 24636700
Glob Health Promot. 2009;Suppl 1:1-118
pubmed: 20506619
Br Dent J. 2015 May 8;218(9):531-6
pubmed: 25952435
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2013 Jul 01;18(4):e671-9
pubmed: 23722124
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2016 Oct;43(4):676-690
pubmed: 25398257
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Oct 10;14:472
pubmed: 25301021
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2013 Oct 30;4:227-9
pubmed: 24235854